I did! And so have several others on the board.
Agreeing
I have basically been reading or scrolling and rolling. No news feed coming out on this case to post about. JMO
I did! And so have several others on the board.
This is my third try to create an enhanced image of the SP. Each time, I have used slightly different video sources/frames. The other two attempts are located at Thread #23, Post 941, and Threat #25, Post #715.
That said, I know many are pretty tired of attempts to enhance the SPs face. And many, including myself, do worry that some of the results are more examples of "pareidolia" rather than good images. This is probably unsurprising, however, given that the source materials available to the public are fairly low quality (nor do we likely have access to the best techniques LE has).
Even so, the fact that the SP appears on camera while looking straight at the camera for several moments makes it nearly impossible to stop trying, even if it is ultimately a losing proposition, based on the hope that maybe, just maybe, some useful and valid image could be discerned. As such, and ever since I saw Sparkys former and striking avatar, Ive been trying hard myself to recreate something similarly compelling given what we do have available. In particular, I wanted to see if I could create something close to Sparky's avatar given that I did not know the precise frame/source/methods used to derive it. (I think my third attempt actually reaches a pretty similar result, however, which I find encouraging.)
My eventual hope is that the best of such attempts will at least give some insight into what the SP does or does not look like. At a minimum, someone who really doesnt match any of the different images would seem to be an unlikely suspect, absent some facial disguise we arent aware of---
As before, Ive made a tutorial video showing how I derived the image:
https://youtu.be/GEcE6XyW838
Thanks,
Mr. X
Maybe. I took it to mean he thought the ring was something of value a burglar would take. Her engagement ring is sparkly.
And what baffles me about the interview @ him talking that he was going to use that insurance to get the girls counseling...??? I'm sure someone would donate their services (professional or church member) to help out with that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I still follow here, but I've exhausted my theories on her murder. I just find it amazing that someone committed this murder with surveillance cameras in the area and now we are 2 months from when it happened with no arrest. The fact that the murderer walked out of the church, got in their car and drove off and the vehicle is not really captured on video because the outside cameras were not working. How lucky can a perp get!
A CG participant is not a Bevers familymember, not neccessarily a friend and surely not a co-worker, right? Just saying..Who else does not fall in either one of those categories? Start your lists..
-Nin
Hi Scout
Is the FBI still on this investigation? I can't recall.
Tks
I think that perp encountered the same problem at the NE that I have been explaining. He tried to bash in the glass in the door, to use the push bar to open it, and then discovered that the push bar wouldn't open it. (Then he went around the side, tried it at the small window in the kitchen door, and same thing.) Ultimately, imo he ended up having to pry the lock off the kitchen door, to gain access.
just would like some thoughts please from WS members
if BB knew about creepy message don't you think that would be the first thing he might have said to reporters?
My wife received a creepy message on LI and now she is gone. (Choked up- oh wait I didn't see that) I've told the police and they are checking into this.
I know now everyone reacts differently - before that discussion starts again - but please not even choked up. Nothing.
Just wanted to say that many WS members are very well informed and you can tell the ones that have been here for awhile - I enjoy how this platform gives people a place to voice their opinions and raise some questions. Which I believe if LE does read this - they all sit around scratching their heads and say now why didn't we think of that...when we all know they are way more ahead of this curve ball than we are.
I think your scenarios are brilliant, especially scenario #2. Scenario 2 is very logical and makes a lot of sense to me. Scenario #3 is good but I am on the fence about SP being a teenager and that a firetruck left the station unnoticed early in the morning without being seen. But brilliant theory that SP had to get into the kitchen to get his SP clothes on!This is a key part of the puzzle I think, and one I'd like to discuss again if anyone's up for it.
The thing is, those NE doors were GLASS double doors. It wouldn't have presented quite the same break-in challenge as the metal kitchen door (which could not have been climbed into). We know these NE doors were both broken because we have photos of them being boarded up with two 4x8' plywood sheets. Here's arkansasmimi's screenshot of the repairs to the NE doors from thread 4 or 5:
View attachment 97606
Here's the back of the building (those NE doors were up a half-flight of stairs in that recessed area by the dumpsters):
View attachment 97607
So here's the thing I keep coming back to...
WHY spend all that time and energy hacking off the hardware from the side metal kitchen door, if 2 glass doors just around the corner were completely broken out? Swatperp could've just crawled through the broken-out areas of those double doors. It'd have been far easier than attempting to climb into the raised kitchen window and far, FAR easier than hacking off the kitchen door's hardware and manipulating the tricky locking pins.
I keep coming back to the increasingly strong conviction that Swatperp HAD to enter by way of the kitchen for some reason. And the only thing that stands out as important enough to necessitate that entry concerns those hall cameras and his disguise. It must've been necessary for SP to enter by way of the kitchen because there are NO motion-activated cameras in the kitchen recording his entry.
Consider this 1st scenario:
Swatperp dresses in SP costume, complete with tools and gear, and comes to a darkened, locked-up church in the pouring rain at 3:50 AM. He has with him at least one powerful breaching tool - (we know this because he used one with great difficulty to hack off the exterior panic hardware of the kitchen door to enter the building) and probably a light source (flashlite, head cam, maybe iPhone flashlite). So here in the middle of the night in the pouring rain Swatperp considers his entry options and...
Decides to hack and wrestle the panic hardware off a metal fire door???
But just around the corner from the kitchen are the rear glass double doors (NE corner by the dumpster). They are in fact broken out by SP - why? Two purposes are possible, hypothetically, for breaking those doors at the outset - vandalism or breaking in. But why wouldn't SP enter by way of those if he was going to break them via vandalism, anyway? Surely he knew the points of entry for the church - a simple walk or drive around would make those obvious. Those NE glass doors would've provided excellent coverage, and he obviously didn't have any qualms about smashing them with a breaching tool...so why not enter the building that way?? But he apparently doesn't because Swatperp instead chooses to stand out in the pouring rain hacking into the kitchen door's hardware. It doesn't make sense at all unless for some reason it was vital to the plan to enter by way of the kitchen, vital to avoid those NE hall cameras upon building ENTRY, even though not vital to avoid them after leaving the kitchen.
The video we've seen doesn't show a wet Swatperp, or even wet hall floors...something to ponder.
Consider this 2nd scenario:
The Swatperp costume and gear was in the kitchen, possibly even in the vestibule of the metal door entrance in a large black trash bag in the rolling trash receptacle pictured there. And a fairly wet perp NOT in disguise entered by way of the kitchen door or window in order to stay out of camera view until dried off and changed into the SP costume left there, (left either by himself or an accomplice during Sunday activities or during the weekend blood drive).
SP then leaves the kitchen upon donning his dry costume and proceeds to make his way around the church vandalizing and entering rooms. He sees the NE double door and bashes the glass out. Two purposes are possible at this point - vandalism or staging point of entry/exit. One other purpose is no longer logical (point of entry).
The only reason that comes to mind why a perp would choose a considerably harder point of entry (in the pouring rain) over the obvious, easier one is some sort of Bigger Motivation. Something was far more vital than having an easy, fast break in - and the only thing I can come up with is those north hallway cameras and the fact that SP may not yet have been disguised properly.
Consider this utterly speculative, elaborative, and brainstorming scenario #3 (keeping in mind it's late night thinking):
Swatperp (teen, male) is wearing gym shorts and white tee; is driven to the CC property by accomplice in fire truck. Fireman accomplice uses his professional skills & tools to ratchet off and open up panic hardware for swatperp, who then enters kitchen and dons swat costume and gear left by accomplice #3 (perhaps one with bad cop ties) over his clothes. He then folds up black trash bag and puts in vest pocket and continues on with scenario 2. Firetruck drives off property and maybe heads on up Walnut Grove Rd to the fire station at 3661 FM-1387.
SP vandalizes church, then kills Missy, and then leaves on foot following creekline at back of the property northward up toward FM-1387. On the way, he sheds his SP costume and gear includng actual murder weapon, wrapping all tightly in the black trash bag which he weights with rocks and pitches into the reservoir. He then heads west from the reservoir, eventually meeting up with Walnut Grove Road, which he follows northward to 1387. He turns left onto 1387 and is now (roughly 6:30 AM, depending on gear disposal) at the high school he attends...which is just across the street from Fire Station #2. (Anyone seeing him on the road would think nothing of it, as he has school that day, and they might assume he's doing athletics training before school.) He may or may not meet up with accomplice fireman (who may or may not actually be from that station) depending on level of suspicion that would arouse. But after hanging out around the track and maybe a light workout in the weight room, he then showers and goes to his Monday morning classes as though it were just another day.
View attachment 97605
MAP PINS:
Green = Creekside Church of Christ
Red = Highschool
Purple = Firestation 2
Route: 3.4 miles - 6 minutes by car - 1 hour 6 min walk (normal; more like 2hrs walking along creekline with SP gear disposal)
I think your scenarios are brilliant, especially scenario #2. Scenario 2 is very logical and makes a lot of sense to me. Scenario #3 is good but I am on the fence about SP being a teenager and that a firetruck left the station unnoticed early in the morning without being seen. But brilliant theory that SP had to get into the kitchen to get his SP clothes on!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Another good reason for marital struggle. But yes there are reasons they might have spoken before 5 am. We don't know what their norm is, just that this isn't normal for most. Its one more incongruity with BB and the Ts in this circumstance, IMO. I know if it were me and I spoke to someone, especially at an unusual hour, and they expressed worry over their spouse's safety and it turned out they were being murdered almost as we spoke, a flag would go off. I guess depends on how far you take coincidence. Not that I think BB or MT is the SP. Just found it striking. Or perhaps the call never happened and MT made it up trying to show what a concerned hubby BB was to help take suspicion away from him. Or perhaps the call did happen because BB knew something and wanted to establish his whereabouts. Just speculating the possibilities around such an odd statement.
A CG participant is not a Bevers familymember, not neccessarily a friend and surely not a co-worker, right? Just saying..Who else does not fall in either one of those categories? Start your lists..
-Nin
("If" the FBI has not done so, already)
They have used this (available "tool") before (although I doubt they would admit to it), but...
They are familiar with "remote viewing".
(Since the clock is "tick, tock" ing away, in regard to this case),
I think they should get some
(real) "remote viewer"(s)
to look and "see",
if they can possibly get some "information" in this case.
```````
Might possibly also be able to get the license plate number,
of that car.
(believed to be a: Nissan Altima)
```````````
Maybe the FBI has already used this "available, tool"
- in regard to this case.
But, if they haven't,
what do they have to lose, by trying it to "see" if they "possibly" CAN get some "information".
[In some cases, authorities HAVE been able to get more "information",
which did - in fact - "help", with the case.]
Why would he share his warning to MB with his mom though? From MTs own interview, she apparently didn't even know they had marital or financial troubles. This points to not a close share everything mom/son relationship so seems a little "off" to me, MOO.
Maybe he didn't share marriage and financial issue because he didn't want her to worry. Maybe she was a worrier and she was the one worried about Missy going out at dark. Perhaps him telling her that he tells MB to be careful, was a response to her worrying about MB safety. I can see my mother or mother in law leaving out the other half of the conversation like that (with no negative intent).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk