TX - Terri 'Missy' Bevers,45, murdered in church/person in SWAT gear,18 Apr 2016 #30

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is a key part of the puzzle I think, and one I'd like to discuss again if anyone's up for it.

The thing is, those NE doors were GLASS double doors. It wouldn't have presented quite the same break-in challenge as the metal kitchen door (which could not have been climbed into). We know these NE doors were both broken because we have photos of them being boarded up with two 4x8' plywood sheets. Here's arkansasmimi's screenshot of the repairs to the NE doors from thread 4 or 5:

View attachment 97606

Here's the back of the building (those NE doors were up a half-flight of stairs in that recessed area by the dumpsters):

View attachment 97607

So here's the thing I keep coming back to...

WHY spend all that time and energy hacking off the hardware from the side metal kitchen door, if 2 glass doors just around the corner were completely broken out? Swatperp could've just crawled through the broken-out areas of those double doors. It'd have been far easier than attempting to climb into the raised kitchen window and far, FAR easier than hacking off the kitchen door's hardware and manipulating the tricky locking pins.

I keep coming back to the increasingly strong conviction that Swatperp HAD to enter by way of the kitchen for some reason. And the only thing that stands out as important enough to necessitate that entry concerns those hall cameras and his disguise. It must've been necessary for SP to enter by way of the kitchen because there are NO motion-activated cameras in the kitchen recording his entry.

Consider this 1st scenario:

Swatperp dresses in SP costume, complete with tools and gear, and comes to a darkened, locked-up church in the pouring rain at 3:50 AM. He has with him at least one powerful breaching tool - (we know this because he used one with great difficulty to hack off the exterior panic hardware of the kitchen door to enter the building) and probably a light source (flashlite, head cam, maybe iPhone flashlite). So here in the middle of the night in the pouring rain Swatperp considers his entry options and...

Decides to hack and wrestle the panic hardware off a metal fire door???

But just around the corner from the kitchen are the rear glass double doors (NE corner by the dumpster). They are in fact broken out by SP - why? Two purposes are possible, hypothetically, for breaking those doors at the outset - vandalism or breaking in. But why wouldn't SP enter by way of those if he was going to break them via vandalism, anyway? Surely he knew the points of entry for the church - a simple walk or drive around would make those obvious. Those NE glass doors would've provided excellent coverage, and he obviously didn't have any qualms about smashing them with a breaching tool...so why not enter the building that way?? But he apparently doesn't because Swatperp instead chooses to stand out in the pouring rain hacking into the kitchen door's hardware. It doesn't make sense at all unless for some reason it was vital to the plan to enter by way of the kitchen, vital to avoid those NE hall cameras upon building ENTRY, even though not vital to avoid them after leaving the kitchen.

The video we've seen doesn't show a wet Swatperp, or even wet hall floors...something to ponder.

Consider this 2nd scenario:

The Swatperp costume and gear was in the kitchen, possibly even in the vestibule of the metal door entrance in a large black trash bag in the rolling trash receptacle pictured there. And a fairly wet perp NOT in disguise entered by way of the kitchen door or window in order to stay out of camera view until dried off and changed into the SP costume left there, (left either by himself or an accomplice during Sunday activities or during the weekend blood drive).

SP then leaves the kitchen upon donning his dry costume and proceeds to make his way around the church vandalizing and entering rooms. He sees the NE double door and bashes the glass out. Two purposes are possible at this point - vandalism or staging point of entry/exit. One other purpose is no longer logical (point of entry).

The only reason that comes to mind why a perp would choose a considerably harder point of entry (in the pouring rain) over the obvious, easier one is some sort of Bigger Motivation. Something was far more vital than having an easy, fast break in - and the only thing I can come up with is those north hallway cameras and the fact that SP may not yet have been disguised properly.

Consider this utterly speculative, elaborative, and brainstorming scenario #3 (keeping in mind it's late night thinking):

Swatperp (teen, male) is wearing gym shorts and white tee; is driven to the CC property by accomplice in fire truck. Fireman accomplice uses his professional skills & tools to ratchet off and open up panic hardware for swatperp, who then enters kitchen and dons swat costume and gear left by accomplice #3 (perhaps one with bad cop ties) over his clothes. He then folds up black trash bag and puts in vest pocket and continues on with scenario 2. Firetruck drives off property and maybe heads on up Walnut Grove Rd to the fire station at 3661 FM-1387.

SP vandalizes church, then kills Missy, and then leaves on foot following creekline at back of the property northward up toward FM-1387. On the way, he sheds his SP costume and gear includng actual murder weapon, wrapping all tightly in the black trash bag which he weights with rocks and pitches into the reservoir. He then heads west from the reservoir, eventually meeting up with Walnut Grove Road, which he follows northward to 1387. He turns left onto 1387 and is now (roughly 6:30 AM, depending on gear disposal) at the high school he attends...which is just across the street from Fire Station #2. (Anyone seeing him on the road would think nothing of it, as he has school that day, and they might assume he's doing athletics training before school.) He may or may not meet up with accomplice fireman (who may or may not actually be from that station) depending on level of suspicion that would arouse. But after hanging out around the track and maybe a light workout in the weight room, he then showers and goes to his Monday morning classes as though it were just another day.

View attachment 97605

MAP PINS:
Green = Creekside Church of Christ
Red = Highschool
Purple = Firestation 2

Route: 3.4 miles - 6 minutes by car - 1 hour 6 min walk (normal; more like 2hrs walking along creekline with SP gear disposal)

I agree the Point of Entry was planned in advance to avoid the motion activated cameras also.
I'd love to know who cased the church months/weeks in advance or had access to the interior camera info and that also knew cameras outside wouldn't work that night. If the cameras did work the perp(s) and vehicle would have been immediately identified.
I'm leaning towards towards two perps that drove to the Church, one the lookout/driver.
This is a well thought out post.
thank you
 
I think Swat Perp must have known which of the church cameras worked, and which did not. Maybe the Swat Perp arrived before 3:50 am, before the rain, and that is why she/he is not wet in the video.

Perhaps, Swat Perp thinks she/he is smart, and got away with murder, however, she/he may be a stressed, wondering about if the grand jury is about surprise her/him with an indictment. Perhaps, Swat Perp is not feeling his normal self, and will become very ill, with guilt and worry.

and aren't you curious who knows about the exterior cameras NOT working, and which ones inside were?
That takes planning or sheer dumb luck.
 
  • Corrupt Cops
  • Covetous Competitors
  • Ferocious Fireman
  • Heinous Heretics
  • Jealous Jackasses
  • Pissed Paramours
  • Scorned Spouses
  • Wealthy Widows
  • Wicked Witches

Hired Handymen
 
I'm undecided as to whether or not this murderer knew about the cameras or was just very lucky. Did they know the outside cameras worked and it was safe for them to drive into the parking lot? Was the purpose of the SWAT gear to give their victim enough of a pause to allow them to get close enough to hit her? Or also to keep their identity from the camera?

If they knew about the camera's the killer had to have been there at one time or another, possibly at Sunday services, to note where the cameras were located. (As I stated before, if I wasn't a member and I was planning this I would visit during Easter services when I could be in among a maximum number of persons. And non-members would probably draw the least amount of attention.) And who in the church knew the outside cameras were not working or was it common knowledge?

If they planned it ahead of time, no matter how well they did, the killer is going to be stressed wondering what they forgot or missed.

I hope LE grilled Church members about anyone asking about the exterior/interior cameras including anyone who volunteered or was hired to work at the church.
 
and aren't you curious who knows about the exterior cameras NOT working, and which ones inside were?
That times planning or sheer dumb luck.

i'm in the luck camp.I think SP was dropped off, in costume, and expected cameras, and enjoyed the staging activity that cameras would capture. JMO
 
I have been teaching for 37 years and am focusing on the behavior of the suspect. IMO, SWAT Perp had way too much knowledge and confidence of camera placement to be merely considered lucky. This person appears to be of above-average intelligence. He/she has thought through the plan meticulously. While we are on the topic of staging the scene, do you suppose it is possible that the individual had access to the church (obtained surreptitiously) and needed to stage the point of entry to make it appear to be a burglary? The exterior cameras could have been disabled in advance without church personnel noticing. I don't think it would occur to busy church personnel to check cameras regularly.

yes, I do think so. Maybe dressed up as a handyman, janitor or camera repairman.
 
For those speculating the SP came in normal street clothes and got dressed inside - what would be the point of not dressing ahead of time? I would think if you were that concerned about being covered up, you wouldn't risk standing outside trying to break in without any disguise on. From what I read, the outside camera only worked intermittently, and if that was the knowledge SP had, it seems awfully risky to show up with your face exposed and 'hope' none of the exterior cameras caught anything.
 
SP knew which cameras would capture action and except for the time SP was wearing full costume, neither SP nor a vehicle were captured on any of the surveillance. This is not blind luck.

SP may have stashed the costume at the church ahead of time so as to not get it wet on Monday morning, I dunno. But this would require that SP study the weather forecast and consider the issues SP would face if the costume got wet such as foot prints and know where it could be stashed without someone noticing the bag/duffle/whatever. Certainly, disguising the whole costume in a trash bag could work. But, SP would have to know that no one would either throw it out or look into it. SP would only know this if SP was the one responsible for taking out the trash after Sunday service.

This all goes back to my newest theory that SP is a disgruntled member of the church and was there to attack the church because of an issue with one of its leaders/leadership in general or very specifically.

I no longer think SP was there to kill MN but rather to cause harm to 'the church'. MB caught SP without the helmet on in the bathroom and was then killed in a frenzy of fear and surprise because MB recognized SP.

I just can not buy the idea that SP was a stranger to the church and just worked on 'I hope my car and I are not captured on video' or that SP scoped out the church and could tell just by observation that the outdoor cameras were not working properly and knew exactly which areas the indoor cameras captured and which areas they did not.
 
i'm in the luck camp.I think SP was dropped off, in costume, and expected cameras, and enjoyed the staging activity that cameras would capture. JMO

If the cameras caught the license plate game over they'd be caught. That's a big risk to take.
Quite possibly the dumbest & luckiest criminal(s) ever, or well planned executed hit/murder for hire.
 
I am sure this has been previously pointed out. Just reiterating, that there is a directory signdisplaying the offices amongelse. So even a person not familiar with the layout, may target the NW/ W/SWpart of the church to break into the offices. And a staged burglary may showhigher interest in those parts of the building for the same reason.

attachment.php


http://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-...exas-church-murder-victim-terri-missy-bevers/
 

Attachments

  • MB Creekside monument directory CBS april 21.jpg
    MB Creekside monument directory CBS april 21.jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 285
I would have to disagree with BB's reasoning here. I'm leaning towards a targeted murder for many reasons but the wedding ring doesn't even play into it for me. Criminals have their own business modes. If the SP was on a thieving mission that night, he/she did not plan on stealing a wedding ring off of the finger of a woman he had no idea would show up and interrupt his work. Thieves have plans for what they intend to steal... places to unload it and get paid or then, there are those who will only take money. Stolen jewelry requires fencing in certain places or to certain people and, if you don't know where those places or who/where those people are, you're stuck with the stuff. Jewelry is recognizable and many pawn shops are on the lookout, having been notified by LE of the theft. Most likely a wedding ring would have to be melted down and sold for the weight so it couldn't be recognized... NOT worth the risk for a few bucks!
Simpler reasoning (for me, if not for BB) says that thieves don't prepare to steal by loading themselves into a bulky, awkward SWAT type get up with a tool cupboard on his/her chest and complete with a vision/hearing restrictive, hot and sweaty helmet. I could be wrong, for sure... but give me breathable, lightweight, dark colored, loose fitting clothing and and a ski pullover head cover (which would still be hot but it's better than a helmet any day of the week.)
And, as for removing jewelry from someone I just left for dead... no thanks. Because one more thing... that ring may not be very easy to remove and I have gloves on and I'm not taking them off for ANY reason.

Excellent points about how a burglar would operate. But I just what to remind everybody that at that first interview BB gave in front of his house on Tuesday the 18th (IIRC), he said that he did not believe she was targeted.
Meanwhile, observers including professional LE, amateur sleuths and reporters said no way this was random.
And it was at the bloody shirt interview with RB that he came out and said that now he believes she was targeted.
Why does it matter? IMO, it matters because the perp wanted it to look like a burglary gone wrong,. But when popular opinion said it was not that, BB had to agree. Why? Because IMO, his interests are in line with the perp's. IMO, MOO.
 
"Hired Handymen" .... Fired Factotum? Jilted Jack (of all trades?) Here is someone who might know everything there is to know to get that church completely prepared.

Who else would have access to the church? Fire Inspectors? Probably anyone could don a uniform and enter the Church without question. I'd look into two weeks to several months in advance for someone casing and then returning to disable the outside cameras.
 
SP knew which cameras would capture action and except for the time SP was wearing full costume, neither SP nor a vehicle were captured on any of the surveillance. This is not blind luck.

SP may have stashed the costume at the church ahead of time so as to not get it wet on Monday morning, I dunno. But this would require that SP study the weather forecast and consider the issues SP would face if the costume got wet such as foot prints and know where it could be stashed without someone noticing the bag/duffle/whatever. Certainly, disguising the whole costume in a trash bag could work. But, SP would have to know that no one would either throw it out or look into it. SP would only know this if SP was the one responsible for taking out the trash after Sunday service.

This all goes back to my newest theory that SP is a disgruntled member of the church and was there to attack the church because of an issue with one of its leaders/leadership in general or very specifically.

I no longer think SP was there to kill MN but rather to cause harm to 'the church'. MB caught SP without the helmet on in the bathroom and was then killed in a frenzy of fear and surprise because MB recognized SP.

I just can not buy the idea that SP was a stranger to the church and just worked on 'I hope my car and I are not captured on video' or that SP scoped out the church and could tell just by observation that the outdoor cameras were not working properly and knew exactly which areas the indoor cameras captured and which areas they did not.

SP's plan might have been to stash the costume and some tools in the church ahead of time without thought to the weather. SP may have come in from behind the church without using a vehicle. Or, if SP used a vehicle, he/she may have wanted to eliminate the possibility of being pulled over by LE for a simple traffic stop and possibly being found with a SWAT type outfit in the car. Wearing that outfit ahead of time or just being found with that outfit would mean disaster to the whole plan. Just for simplicity, the SP may have wanted everything to be planned and in place except for him/herself on that night.
 
I continue to appreciate the conversation and theories here.
To me, the most important aspects of this case remain these: SP knew MB and her routine. SP had no fear, no hesitation, no thoughts of potential remorse. SP had a mission, for whatever ill-conceived reason. SP thought he/she was doing the "right" thing. This was personal. Very personal. All JMO.
 
PIM, I absolutely love your post from last night. While scenario 3 seems to be a stretch (and I know you said you were just expanding your mind), you do bring up a good point about FFs. A FF would definitely have the skill set to break in to a building... even if that means destroying an external lock set.

I also agree with the posters who have stated that SP seems to have a thorough knowledge of the church. It's not luck that SP avoided detection outside and then attacked MB off-camera. Who would have current knowledge about all of the cameras? Does anyone know how to check to see if CCoC had a recent safety inspection? A rogue police officer/corrupt FF is still on the table. JMO

GummyWorms, I have not wavered one bit from this being a personal and targeted attack. If this was a rogue LEO/corrupt FF, this was someone who had been wronged by MB or who was fearful of being caught in some unsavory activity.
 
IMO the disguise chosen speaks volumes. It wasn't the normal thief or vandal wearing gloves & ski mask, but wearing a padded outfit for protection. JMO
 
If someone other than a night workman or a gym rat was out at that late/early hour someone else MUST know they are the killer. Assuming SP doesn't live alone. Maybe LE can "work" that person. Threaten to charge them as well, see if they crack.
 
Many counties in Colorado, if not all, have Victim's Assistance funds which can be used if the family does not have insurance. A counselor is actually paid directly through these funds, so there is no out of pocket cost for the family. These funds can usually be used by the family to cover things like rent and utilities if necessary due to lost wages, food, even costs for transportation to counseling; almost anything that is impacted by the crime or is necessary for recovery. If the family does have insurance, VA can be used to cover co-pays. In my location in CO, the first 6 counseling visits are guaranteed to be covered, with up to a year of counseling okayed if a treatment plan is submitted and approved. I hope, as is the case here, the PD would inform the family of this option, if it exists in TX.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
453
Total visitors
528

Forum statistics

Threads
608,240
Messages
18,236,715
Members
234,325
Latest member
davenotwayne
Back
Top