I believe itis misguided to start calling people “mean” and “jealous” if they retain CT ontheir personal suspect list.
In footballthey teach you to follow the quarterback’s eyes; because that is the directionthe football will generally go to. Andin a situation like this, where there is little information (LE is holding itpretty tight), the mantra has to be “follow LE’s eyes”
I suspect LEwould love to search dozens of people, based on all their initial reading andanalysis of MB’s texts, e-mails, phone records and interviews with locals whoknew MB, as well as reliable tips. But theyhad to limit them to what a judge would reasonably allow. They chose 9 total they said they needed. CT is on there. A spouse of her co-worker? By itself, that would be odd.
The nextthing you know, black cars were confiscating all AT’s/CT’s garbage (I wasfollowing on AT’s FB as he posted about that.)
And thenthey conducted questioning. She stayedon the list. And they brought her backagain for another longer round of questioning.
While everyother major POI (BB, RB/VB) was posting their alibi, it was silent in the AT/CTcamp. Per locals, LE hung out at AT’s CG camps,creating a presence.
Then anational professional reporter from Midlothian goes on WebSleuth radio tellsthe national audience an arrest is forth coming. When asked who? We were all kind of shocked she answered the questionbut she said her information points to CT.
Then you check down the list:
-Light skinned
-5’8 – about what WS’s bestmathematicians put SP at
-Intelligent and calculated
-An injured leg. There shows up a picture in FB wearing abright pink cast on her leg. And in manypictures, you will see her not plant that leg all the way down.
Now I hope this is all a terriblecoincidence and she is completely exonerated.
Arguments that might vindicate her:
1. She does notappear to be the shape of SP. I agreewith that. Now SP is wearing thick cover(you can’t even tell what gender they are). But it does look like a differently proportioned individual.
2. How would shehave opportunity to go out and do this unnoticed in that time frame. Yes. That is a very valid point. LE isgoing to have to nail that down.
Arguments that do not hold water.
1. A young husband/father wouldn’t be so stupidas to go out on his wife and children. Turn on the Tube tonight and there will probably be an entire TV showbased just on men doing that.
2. AJ and MB hadonly known each other for 5 weeks so they couldn’t have been in a relationship. How many couples do you know that got married
within 5 weeks of meeting theirspouse? Most people can name someone.
Not mean orjealous. Just following the data,following LE’s eyes and coming up with JMHO candidate #1A.
I’ve got theB clan at #1B. I’ve read many of thearguments here as well. Some veryconvincing. Some describing everydaylife of any one of uf. One thing thatconfuses me is the “shotgun” approach of several Sleuthers in this camp. Essentially, it’s someone in the B clan. Not sure, who or how many, but it’sthem. I agree there are some viablecandidates there as well. But, generally, in real life, it’s not 5 or 6family members all ganging up on one person (to the point of killing them). See if we can’t pinpoint the most viablescenario and vet it.
But again. I know nothing. I’m 50/50 SP ismale or female, I’m 50/50 there were accomplices, and 50/50 a weapon waspresent. I know nothing; and that makesthis a mystery. Let’s solve it forMissy.