Sorry, I don't understand.He had bought no one-way-ticket - could have gone wrong and then what?
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
Sorry, I don't understand.He had bought no one-way-ticket - could have gone wrong and then what?
Sorry, I don't understand.
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
I don't think he would have been that careless, or that obvious by just buying a one way ticket. How was he going to explain that?I think FromGermany was saying that if BB had bought a one way ticket to MS for the fishing trip, (and supposing he had been in on the plan to murder MB), then if he got down to MS and the plan somehow went awry, how would he get back home . My answer was that he would just buy a one-way ticket from MS back to TX.
I don't think he would have been that careless, or that obvious by just buying a one way ticket. How was he going to explain that?
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
We know that police generally look first to spouses, then other close family members. In the absence of compelling evidence pointing elsewhere, or perhaps in tandem with it, do they then work outward in concentric circles, looking at extended family, friends, neighbors and coworkers, as witnesses and/or possible suspects? Do they look at the social media postings of extended family and friends? Would they look at what family/friends/coworkers/neighbors/clients -- anyone on her FB friends list or Twitter followers -- posted on April 18 or shortly afterwards to see if anything seemed odd?
I don't want to comment specifically about the MIL or other family. It doesn't seem out of the question that some people who knew Missy -- women? -- may have resented or disapproved of her relatively new buff ways. Did they think she had gotten too big, or maybe too lean, for her britches? Was she getting too much male attention for someone's liking? This happens every day and doesn't lead to murder, but all you need is someone with a few loose screws.
Bb was on the phone with her at 10pm and she dozed off on the phone.
So imo. Bb wasn't at the church 5 hours later.
Bb was on the phone with her at 10pm and she dozed off on the phone.
So imo. Bb wasn't at the church 5 hours later.
I never thought BB was anywhere near the church. I do believe he was in Mississippi as he made that overly clear..... many times. Thanks for reminding me of his phone calls to her late at night, which will of course show he was in Mississippi and nowhere near the crime scene. Another detail added to the list of why he was "in the know".Bb was on the phone with her at 10pm and she dozed off on the phone.
So imo. Bb wasn't at the church 5 hours later.
why are we talking about a burglary..... LE stated it was not!
LE said they were casting a wide net in their early presser. I read an article about the Mark Seivers case that mentioned LE in that case cast a wide net that included even the gardener. Also, a friend of Seivers was also noticing odd things about her friend and tipped LE. All that to say that LE in MBs case maybe has some similar things going on. MPD says that MBs case is still an active investigation and NOT cold case. JMO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s possible that LE is focusing on someone or some people in MB’s case (whether or not BB and/or family). It took about 8 months for Sievers’ husband to be arrested because LE was busy getting their ducks in a row (i.e. interviewing the deceased wife’s friend who was reporting the husband’s odd behavior as well as getting info on the guy(s) who actually carried out the murder). LE in that case did not announce they were focusing on the husband for a long time before his arrest – perhaps leaving people (the public) to believe they had no good leads, but in reality, they did. Let's hope that's the case for MB's murder.
http://www.news-press.com/story/new...vers-arrested-wright-pleas-25-years/80997770/
why are we talking about a burglary..... LE stated it was not!
Maybe that bad theory is the reason that seven months later investigators have made zero progress on this case. It's hard to solve a case when you eliminate the obvious explanations, without any evidence.