mrazda71
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2014
- Messages
- 3,136
- Reaction score
- 11,408
Motives?
So confusing with this one, because they've both been charged. If it was just ScW charged you'd guess it was straight forward, as he must have been alone with the children whilst SaW worked (although the number of children she probably didn't work for long spells due to Mat leave).
BW either KNEW SOMETHING
- Long term child abuse - both of them? The family will have had lots of dealings with agencies due to the disabilities, and the children were not home-educated, so various opportunities for professional referrals / child's disclosure.
SaW seems quite clever though so fake compliance perhaps. Tho if there has been previous concerns raised this will ofc build LE's case now.
- Financial/Fraud/Drug Addiction? I just can't shake the feeling that money - SaW's social media PR/her MH, ScW's gambling - might be linked?
I (professionally) know of a couple who went to extreme lengths to keep their many, and most registered disabled, children purely because it was very lucrative. The poor children themselves did not have a happy life, to put it mildly.
SaW says in one of her campaigns that she has 3 with the hereditary illness. But she also mentions others have Austism. If only 3 were registered disabled then the benefits income would be £800+a week alone. As I say, it could be well over £1k a week if there are other children with additional needs. That's not including housing & council tax benefit allowances which would cover their rent & CTax in full. & SaW's wages or Mat pay. So if SaW and ScW thought the children were at threat of being removed, their quite substantial income would be too.
All this said, I can't really pin this down. They don't appear to have a particularly lavish lifestyle. So IF they weren't spending all the money on their children (which they may well have been), did SaW support ScW's gambling, where they both gambling? Was one/both of them addicted to drugs?
If it's not about the money, it's just that SaW likes the attention having the children gives her. Fine, makes sense. However don't see how that fits with the murder?
Or BW did DID SOMETHING
As has already been said could be
- hurt one of the other children (or they hurt her), accidentally or otherwise
- told them she was pregnant - this for me is a no-go, I don't think - non-religious etc - this type of revelation would lead them into a fury to kill
From the parent of a disabled daughter - there is no such thing as 'registered disabled'.
Disability benefits are also not handed out willynilly. There are numerous hoops to jump through, not just once but repeatedly every time your child has to be reassessed. This is potentially multiple times each year.
No child, whatever the condition is guaranteed to qualify or to what level.
There is no one set amount of money - yes, your child is disabled, here's x amount of £s.
There are care elements and mobility elements and multiple levels of each.
I can quite honestly tell you that 99.9% (or higher) of parents would quite happily give up these 1k a week (you say) benefits to have a healthy child instead. Even the selfish ones.