Bootlace15
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2019
- Messages
- 88
- Reaction score
- 359
I've never before seen a case where people can learn so much from the comments on a deleted post on FB! Wonder if the UK is missing Jeremy Kyle more than we thought!
THIS is the moment a teen boy allegedly murdered by his mum appeared on TV with a yellow mohawk to raise cash for a cancer-stricken school pal.
Speaking on the show, Tristan says: "My friend is dying of bone cancer, I asked if I could dye my hair yellow for him. His favourite colour is yellow."
I have been wondering why in every photo I've seen of the boys they have unnaturally coloured hair, maybe it was a regular charity thing for them
6 children. of course there is the possibility some may have been SEN or have disabilities.
Maybe they were allowed to dye the hair and no one said don’t? Parents or school.I have been wondering why in every photo I've seen of the boys they have unnaturally coloured hair, maybe it was a regular charity thing for them
Maybe they were allowed to dye the hair and no one said don’t? Parents or school.
Maybe but I don't know many schools that allow unnatural hair colours like that. I don't think they did it themselves, it's like it been done well, especially the yellow mohican, I wonder if they were regular school attenders, if not signs of something going wrong could very easily have been missed
Any word on the “incident”?
It would seem that this "incident" has never been heard of since Cain and Abel. Even the ukmail (which doesn't hold back on anything) doesn't even allow comments on this particular crime. I've NEVER seen that on any of their articles, ever. It's as if this particular crime is strictly "taboo." I don't understand the secrecy or the reason for it. I must be missing something, but I don't understand. They released the names, ages, address and photos, but COD, ?????
It's perfectly normal not to allow comments on a case once someone has been charged. The Mail is no exception; to allow comments would risk contempt of court.It would seem that this "incident" has never been heard of since Cain and Abel. Even the ukmail (which doesn't hold back on anything) doesn't even allow comments on this particular crime. I've NEVER seen that on any of their articles, ever. It's as if this particular crime is strictly "taboo." I don't understand the secrecy or the reason for it. I must be missing something, but I don't understand. They released the names, ages, address and photos, but COD, ?????
It's perfectly normal not to allow comments on a case once someone has been charged. The Mail is no exception; to allow comments would risk contempt of court.
Apart from basic reports on court appearances, there are unlikely to be any further details reported in the UK press as it might prejudice the trial. Social media of course is another matter, but the police have already issued warnings about commenting there.
Allowed on social media, you mean? It's thin ice. They seem to have been slow in curbing it, eg I would have expected the accused's Facebook pages to be shut down as soon as they were charged.Isn't it just that the surviving children aren't allowed to be named? Everything else is allowed. Or appears to be.
Any word on the “incident”?
Social services are stretched so sadly this sort of thing will keep cropping up. You can’t monitor everyone and, as recent history has shown, taking kids into care hasn’t proven to be that helpful or safe!
This is really sad but too common I’m afraid. We have these messed up situations with broken families and low morals. Sure Jeremy Kyle is banned telly but it was going for 15 years on the premise of finding situations like this.
Poor kids.
Maybe but I don't know many schools that allow unnatural hair colours like that. I don't think they did it themselves, it's like it been done well, especially the yellow mohican, I wonder if they were regular school attenders, if not signs of something going wrong could very easily have been missed