CoverMeCagney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2013
- Messages
- 13,405
- Reaction score
- 65,274
Is it worth mentioning he used to work at Sainsburys and didn't the bin lorry go there?
They have used the correct time window of 03.20 to 05.20 for witnesses but all earlier ones have been traced just leaving these two after 05.00 a.m. so that's the reason I think.I expect we will have more about that in the papers tomorrow. I noticed that they have got a bit muddled about the times of the potential witnesses by saying they were around when C was last seen.
Sainsburys Mildenhall?Is it worth mentioning he used to work at Sainsburys and didn't the bin lorry go there?
There's one in BSE too.Is it worth mentioning he used to work at Sainsburys and didn't the bin lorry go there?
I would say Sainsbury's BSE as that is larger and I don't think mildenhall is that large a store,Sainsburys Mildenhall?
There's also one in Kesgrave in the east of Ipswich
That has me puzzled (again). If he works at Ipswich, why send out a lorry from there to BSE to collect waste when there is a depot in BSE just up the road?
No, that hasn't been said, it was just me trying to make sense of how things work. It could be anything of a number of things that led to him being arrested. My apologies if I confused you.Has it been said he sent a lorry out? He may not have been working that Friday. He could have been on a night out in BSE himself and possibly one of 39 witnesses? Did something after the fact that has got him arrested?
I hate to say this but bin mishap was the only thing that made sense in an occams razor way. It was the bin weight that seemed to make the simplest answer unworkable. It must be something to do with manipulating that data somehow if this is the answer. How awful if Corrie has been in a rubbish dump for 6 months 😢
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
No, that hasn't been said, it was just me trying to make sense of how things work. It could be anything of a number of things that led to him being arrested. My apologies if I confused you.
I think Scorpios explanation is probably correct that he is suspended pending further investigation into PTCOJ. The Telegraph says he is and the Sun says former, so suspended would cover both.In Reacher's article above HS is referred to both as a 'special constable' and 'ex special constable'.... which actually is it? I know there was some discussion on this point upthread.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
We are told that the part of the landfill being searched is all rubbish collected from BSE. About 8000 tonnes so why is it there if it's supposed to be incinerated?I think Scorpios explanation is probably correct that he is suspended pending further investigation into PTCOJ. The Telegraph says he is and the Sun says former, so suspended would cover both.
P.s. I note the MM article confirms for us the two bins on Monday were council not Biffa. And council general waste goes to incinerator not landfill so I still cannot see how Milton receives any BSE landfill.
We are told that the part of the landfill being searched is all rubbish collected from BSE. About 8000 tonnes so why is it there if it's supposed to be incinerated?
Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk
The council refuse is supposed to go to Red Lodge to be sorted and from there it then goes to the incinerator. So, I don't understand how it's ended up at Milton and it does not seem to have anything to do with Biffa.I note the MM article confirms for us the two bins on Monday were council not Biffa. And council general waste goes to incinerator not landfill so I still cannot see how Milton receives any BSE landfill.