Some interesting snippets here
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/82...missing-RAF-man-news-Facebook-Nicola-Urquhart
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/82...missing-RAF-man-news-Facebook-Nicola-Urquhart
Nothing much new to go on then,Some interesting snippets here
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/82...missing-RAF-man-news-Facebook-Nicola-Urquhart
When Corrie slept in the door way it wasn't because he was looking for somewhere to sleep.
He slid down the wall he was leaning on. Then fell over on his side. It wasn't what looked like a conscious decision. But to climb in a bin would be. .....
.... She said he walked into Hughes doorway, leaned against the wall and ate his food. He then went into the corner and urinated, then leant back against the wall.
She added: Corrie then slowly slides down the wall onto his bum and lands with a little bump. He then lays over in a semi foetal position and does not move one bit for an hour and a half.
He stands up, wanders around and then walks down towards the horseshoe. That's it.
It is not horrific distressing images like some have tried to say. Corrie is not crying or upset or being sick or doing anything else.
I thought this was interesting.
Yes it is. It rules out a lot of theories that some people had. This means CM wasn't having a planned nap whilst waiting around for anyone. He wasn't whatsapping or tindering people for a meetup or he would have been seen on his phone. It certainly doesn't sound like he was in a state to intentionally go missing.
I don't understand why NU rules out CM getting in a bin intentionally. Hunkering down into a small space and not thinking straight are common with hypothermia and CM would have been pretty cold after being on concrete for an hour and a half.
I read it slightly differently. I thought she was saying that he was so drunk, he just slid down the wall and lay in a slump for an hour and a half meant that he probably didn't have the motor skills to have deliberately climbed into the bin, as he wasn't even capable of sitting down. But that was just the way I interpreted it.
"The mum of missing RAF *gunner Corrie McKeague fears he may have been drugged on the night he disappeared.
Nicola Urquhart believes someone may have deliberately targeted her son and spiked his drink.
Now Nicola, a police officer in Scotland, wants cops to re-question every witness but under *caution."
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/corrie-mckeagues-mum-fears-missing-10805537
I wonder if, if he was in the bin, he managed to jump out (say at Sainsburys) and set off cross country to go home. That would tick a lot of boxes eg the bin weight, the phone going off without him, not being found at landfill, not seen making plans on his phone etc.
Do they have more evidence he went to landfill, other than the bin being heavy enough to have a person in it?
It is possible, or he could have stayed in the rubbish truck until its next stop to collect more rubbish and then climbed out, hence him not being seen leaving the HS and if he had been spiked he could have collapsed somewhere remote and just hasn't been found yet, I really think if he went into landfill whole , e.g not incinerated, then he would have been found by now, or at least his clothing and shoes would have been, IMO this search is taking too long with no trace of him.
I agree, he should have been found by now unless someone has got their sums badly wrong. Millions are being spent so I reckon they MUST have more to go on than the bin weight. I dunno... it's all really v v strange indeed.
They seem really certain he's in there so they could be holding a lot back from the media, I just don't understand, surely the person who drove the truck that night would remember where about son the landfill it was emptied, surely he/she would remember roughly the exact spot. And if he wasn't incinerated, I know it sounds horrible but I reakon Corrie clothes would have held his remains pretty much in tact, so stopping them from being scattered, say as much as they would if he'd of gone in there unclothed. And even if his remains have scattered, human bones are big, especially bones like the femur, I don't think theyd be too hard to spot.
after the pick up at Sainsbury's in mildenhal we know very little , IMO a transfer station, we have never been told on what day or time the rubbish went to Milton landfill , IMO some time on the Monday , then we have the incinerator option , so transfer station must be sending rubbish to landfill and incinerator ,Pretty sure the police or family have said the exact spot where the lorry stopped has been pinpointed but I'm too tired to find the source.
His boots are the biggie for me: difficult to destroy, wouldn't degrade quickly and easy to identify. Same with a wallet and of course phone.
How can they NOT know whether this lorry dumped stuff at the incinerator, that's what troubles me. It did or it didn't, there should be no grey area unless someone is covering an improper process.
"The mum of missing RAF *gunner Corrie McKeague fears he may have been drugged on the night he disappeared.
Nicola Urquhart believes someone may have deliberately targeted her son and spiked his drink.
Now Nicola, a police officer in Scotland, wants cops to re-question every witness but under *caution."
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/corrie-mckeagues-mum-fears-missing-10805537
They seem really certain he's in there so they could be holding a lot back from the media, I just don't understand, surely the person who drove the truck that night would remember where about son the landfill it was emptied, surely he/she would remember roughly the exact spot. And if he wasn't incinerated, I know it sounds horrible but I reakon Corrie clothes would have held his remains pretty much in tact, so stopping them from being scattered, say as much as they would if he'd of gone in there unclothed. And even if his remains have scattered, human bones are big, especially bones like the femur, I don't think theyd be too hard to spot.
A landfill would be hard to map in your head, it's just a massive pile of rubbish with no markers. Whoever tipped the bin lorry rubbish there would have a vague idea what area it was in but if you dump dozens of loads a day it would be hard to remember to the metre. Rubbish is pounded and compressed so it gets moved about after being dumped. I imagine it like a ball pit.
Because of the compression bones could be shattered. Cags makes a good point that the boots are a good thing to look for.
So NU is back to the third party option? Drugged and abducted?