Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes it is but LE don't think so. I don't know why they are so sure except for the three things I have just mentioned.Its possible he had misplaced his phone or had it stolen.
To me it means the majority disagree that he is in LF. Why do you say it means nothing? We might as well just stop commenting on this forum if our opinions mean nothing imo.Our polls mean nothing though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I still wonder about the sugar beet slurry pits and the beet factory unconfirmed sighting. It was said that the slurry pits are drained once a year. Just wondering if they have been done at all since C went missing more than a year ago now.
Post number 12 in the media thread is the one that mentions the sighting and it is worded as "someone in light clothing walking at the back of the sugar beet factory near the Hollow Road I.E. " It was an unconfirmed sighting .The sighting was of someone next to the 'Hollow Road' industrial estate. If they mean Eastern Way, at the end of Hollow Road nearest town, the sugar factory isn't visible as it's set a long way back and there's buildings in between; you have to know how to get to the factory from the main road. If they meant the far end of Hollow Road, up near Marlows Garden Centre, he factory is still set back, so it's still a concise effort to approach. I think if someone can find their way from the HS to Hollow Road, they've got a fair idea where they are going.
because it's been over a year now and at some point the search has to be called off.
That's not true, though. Look at the Madeleine McCann case. More than a decade later and we're still throwing millions at the case on virtually no new evidence.
Good to see you, Amonet, been aaages :wave:
That's not true, though. Look at the Madeleine McCann case. More than a decade later and we're still throwing millions at the case on virtually no new evidence.
Post number 12 in the media thread is the one that mentions the sighting and it is worded as "someone in light clothing walking at the back of the sugar beet factory near the Hollow Road I.E. " It was an unconfirmed sighting .
I am hoping that if Corrie ended up in the landfill that this will finally find his remains.
I can't see any other option at this point other than landfill. I think we explored a lot of options early on in the threads and the landfill is the most likely outcome.
I don't think the police have evidence other than the bin weight, the phone pings, and the lack of evidence pointing at anything else, but I think that's enough for them to have strong suspicions due to the body of knowledge that they carry with them and we don't have that body of knowledge.
I did expect us to end up converging on an answer, and that does seem to happen in most of the (few) cases I've followed on this forum, but in this case the majority are saying no to the landfill? Despite that there's no convergence on one single theory of what did happen to Corrie.
I don't even think the police investigation has done anything hugely wrong other than not being funded to have a hundred officers working on this investigation 24/7 until there was resolution, and that sucks but it's the real world.
I'm not local but just looking at maps of the site it appears massive. I know SP will have the precise location of the sighting and it is in the direction of Honiton so I wondered why no searches in that area that's all. I know they searched most of the route back to Honiton via Livermore IIRC and just think that sighting should have generated more searching in that area. They discounted it because no cctv confirned it yet no cctv confirmed he walked back at all, and still they searched those routes back.My point was that to end up in the slurry pits, you've got to make some concious movement to get there. Knowing that stretch of road, 'near' the industrial estate and 'at the back' of the sugar factory isn't a precise description of the area and doesn't mean the person allegedly seen was walking immediately beside the factory and has been tempted to climb a fence or stumbled across the pits by accident. The factory is mostly set back from Hollow Road.
I'm not local but just looking at maps of the site it appears massive. I know SP will have the precise location of the sighting and it is in the direction of Honiton so I wondered why no searches in that area that's all. I know they searched most of the route back to Honiton via Livermore IIRC and just think that sighting should have generated more searching in that area. They discounted it because no cctv confirned it yet no cctv confirmed he walked back at all, and still they searched those routes back.
Talking of sightings, I wonder why LE didn't take the Brandon sighting as a confirmation of the Five ways sighting?
Could be that the police were concentrating their resources on the higher risk fields and wooded areas, where it would have been dark and awkward underfoot. Hollow Road is lit, mostly residential, and the factory has plenty of fencing, and cameras.
I apologise for quoting info SS, but I do think it helps to understand the procedure LE perform with Missing People, in particular with regard to sightings.
This whole link is well worth reading (think I posted it earlier in this case?) but in particular regarding how sightings of missing people are clarified.
Much as we - the outsiders - think they are worth more investigation there are certain procedures LE/police use for these.
https://www.app.college.police.uk/a...issing-persons/missing-person-investigations/
Public sightings
Further information:
Information management
Sightings must be carefully managed to ensure that they are properly considered in the context of the overall investigation. The reliability of any sightings received should always be assessed and attempts made to corroborate the information.
Professional experience has shown that the public will contact the police with sightings of persons who are being sought, particularly when there has been significant media interest. For a number of reasons, however, they are often mistaken and rarely, but occasionally, deliberately wish to mislead the investigators. This is an issue that can present difficulties, and investigations in high-profile cases can become overwhelmed by the volume of sightings.
All sightings should be recorded.............more...............