UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #3

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is there a sex offender registry in the UK? In the US there is, and you can plug in a zip code to see who on the list lives nearby.

There is a register. It's not for public access although there are some online 'unofficial' and therefore accuracy-questionable versions.
 
Am new on here, and have been following Corrie since the start like all of you. I have a question which has no doubt been asked ! But can not find the answer ? I have tried looking back in the posts but there is so many?
Could anyway say if the CCTV was manned that evening of the 23rd was it automatic

The earlier CCTV Brentgrovel Street control room was manned as it manually tracked Corrie as he walked across the road. Don't know if the unit was still manned later for the Short Brackland CCTV but no reason to think it wasn't.
 
Am new on here, and have been following Corrie since the start like all of you. I have a question which has no doubt been asked ! But can not find the answer ? I have tried looking back in the posts but there is so many?
Could anyway say if the CCTV was manned that evening of the 23rd was it automatic
Unmanned
 
Then I would wonder if something else was going on in the background and the poor CCTV controller had to make a decision on whom to zoom in on, and Corrie having a wee wasn't as important as another incident going on
 
It would make sense as to how Corrie walked out of the area unseen. If say something else was kicking off and had to be prioritised. But that's only going on if CCTV was manned
 
If all exits out of bse are heavily covered by cctv to the extent that he wasn't seen leaving on foot then it stands to reason that all entering/exiting traffic is also recorded on cctv.

If the dead end area has been through searches and he is no longer there then then they must have his exit vehicle on cctv, whether he is visibly in a vehicle or not.

Searching specific areas away from the Barton mills direction and especially an area near a breakers yard certainly suggest they are following specific vehicle movements and the very small amount of focus on the cars in the area at the time in general suggest this is the most important information. More so that they are appealing for motorists to come forward.
I cant help thinking that with Corries personality coming out. Flamboyant, confident, loud enough to get noticed and asked to leave club ect. Im leaning more to willingly got into vehicle. I cant see him allowing being pushed in car. The hooded chap, it would be interesting to see if his hood was up before. This confirms why the family said it wasnt Corrie as hooded man was seen going in.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
 
Quick clarification on Nicola's comment re phone yesterday. Today she has said:

"This is NOT true corries phone has never been found."
 
I was surprised that nobody seemed to pick up on getting help from an anti-terrorist organization back when that was reported. I noticed that right away.
Maybe Uncle Tony was trying to bluff abit. Calling in favours from friends he knew. Realistically if there is no indication of terrorist or extremist interaction or fit into the profile its unlikely a senior officer would ok a search. Im thinking they would ground thecspeculation based on evidence and not Corrie just went missing.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
 
Maybe Uncle Tony was trying to bluff abit. Calling in favours from friends he knew. Realistically if there is no indication of terrorist or extremist interaction or fit into the profile its unlikely a senior officer would ok a search. Im thinking they would ground thecspeculation based on evidence and not Corrie just went missing.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

They were mentioned in the context of running the FB group, so my assumption was that they were advising on social media engagement, running digital campaigns etc. If you look at the staff profile on the company page, that is something they specialise in.

I agree they are likely contacts of Tony's.
 
Let's see how this one develops.
My first thought is that it's something old that's been dug up from the field with the sugar beet.
It took place yesterday. That seems the most likely explanation

Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
 
Quick clarification on Nicola's comment re phone yesterday. Today she has said:

"This is NOT true corries phone has never been found."

I'm glad that's cleared up, someone yesterday said thought it was just the way she speaks which I thought was a good point at the time and is probably true.

It's something to be careful of when most of the people reading your posts aren't Scottish and read things very differently to the way they are meant to make sure everyone how's trying to help has the correct info

JMO
 
I was impressed to see the latest Daily Mail article on Corrie had over 200 comments. The previous ones had only had a handful.

Most of the comments were scandalized that this has been out of the national media for so long.

To be honest, if the investigation is going off the rails or is being hushed up due to terrorism, it wouldn't surprise me at all if Tony had arranged for someone to put a comment on Facebook about the hooded man to bring it to the public's attention.

Not suggesting that he did that, but I could see myself doing something like that if I was being stonewalled.

I think most of these are posters from the FB Find Corrie page though.
 
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-suffolk-37987587


"Detectives believe he stopped for a brief nap in a doorway before setting off to walk the nine miles (15km) back to the RAF Honington base alone"

There is still no evidence that he left Bury in a vehicle, it would seem ?

The family seem pretty certain he couldn't have left that alleyway on foot without being seen on cctv. This would surely only leave the option of leaving in a vehicle? Looking at what we know now it seems a bit presumptuous to assume he was setting off to walk back home and didn't have any other plans for the night.

I would say the families updates on Facebook are filled with stuff that's mostly not making the news.
 
A question referring to the "black zones" experienced by CCTV (due to the capabilities of Cam09 and when Cam34 was pointing down Brentgrovel Street) ....did receive a reply from Tony.

He said "that was inaccurate as it is based on one camera".

There seems to be huge conflict around this point. And yet some agrrement !

The BBC report suggests that the police did not see Corrie leave AND Tony suggests that "a camera" was always trained on that area.

Yet.... the police search far away from Bury. And the family suggest there was a third party involved.
 
The thing is, no one can cut this "both ways".

Either,

#1 Corrie was completely unseen leaving the loading bay area by both Cam09 and Cam34

or

#2 At least one camera was trained on that area and his method of departure can be assumed/partially seen.

Tony replied to me saying, my query was based on one camera. And that is not so.

If Corrie "vanished", it assumes that a camera was pointed on that area all the time. So Cam09 and/or Cam34

If Corrie left that area (and searches seem to indicate that) then those same cameras, at some point, weren't focused on that area.

The third option is, he remained in that area (way after his phone left that place)....and was "unnoticed" leaving "several hours later".

I have no idea why the police or the family can confirm this ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
2,826
Total visitors
2,905

Forum statistics

Threads
599,735
Messages
18,098,861
Members
230,917
Latest member
CP95
Back
Top