I guess the judge decided that so he couldn't be pulled up on trying to sway the Jury. As it would prove he could initiate and carry out volcanic rage towards an adult.The ex journalist inside me crackled...
The jury did NOT hear about those convictions, the judge ruled her evidence inadmissible as reported here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...eat-metal-pole-convicted-strangling-2005.html
But could he to a child. Yet his own child?
The Judge had to tread so carefully. That it didnt give BB or JG any reason to give doubt on the case to yet again. Overturn it. Thru lack of evidence. Etc etc etc
I think the Judge knew all about BBs antics and prior history. Not much follows our lives these days without a valid log kept of it. So the account from the family dog to the younger brother. Will have been in his mind. And to secure a sentence for BB he chose to lead as he did.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk