Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
initially it wasn't known for certain if she had her meds with her or not
i'm thinking they must know by now.....her belongings at both houses will have been searched. if her disappearance was planned or a family member had assisted then i'm also sure the police will know by now
i feel she's in plain sight....under noses.....
If she isn't taking any treatment then there wouldn't be the problem of side effects from coming off it when she disappeared.She posted on SM she believed her mother cured her epilepsy 4 years ago so she might not be treating it.
RD can barely walk a few yards so i think she can be ruled out
Does anyone know whether it's likely that RD and NE were under surveillance after they'd been released? If yes that would rule them out as the persons who dumped the clothes.
Perhaps they are hoping she will post something.Is it unusual that the police have left her social media channels so open for so long?
I don't think we can pin TOO much on the Instagram posts as we aren't reading them in context - friends and family may be able to explain or understand them.She posted on SM she believed her mother cured her epilepsy 4 years ago so she might not be treating it.
I don't think we can pin TOO much on the Instagram posts as we aren't reading them in context - friends and family may be able to explain or understand them.
As I've said previously, they may not all be Gaias own texts/screenshots -
The 'advice' from Jupiturmm/Maya was posted after Gaia disappeared, while Maya was in a terrible state herself and in her own unstable brain, Maya could well have been convincing herself that Gaia was hiding rather than the unthinkable.
Whatever has happened - I truly don't think that Gaia would purposefully put her parents, siblings and loved ones through this ...
overthemoon, to save asking the mods to do it, could you take down that post please. As has been pointed out already, it is not permitted.
I'm not so sure this sort of thing happens that often in reality? IIRC in the Becky Watts case the Police had to track the couple down to re-arrest them and they had evidence/strong suspicions already.
Suspects are certainly put under surveillance if the police think they might get worthwhile evidence from it.
It tends not to be done unless there is a realistic chance that the persons being watched may lead to measurable progress in the investigation simply because it ties up at least 2 officers at any one time for each person being watched from a car parked near a property - and that's expensive. Foot surveillance can tie up even more officers.
Contrary to popular belief, manned surveillance of any sort is pretty much a last resort in the UK due to cost and, in cases where it is carried out by virtually any public body (including the police), the paperwork necessary to comply with RIPA.