flightpath
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2017
- Messages
- 66
- Reaction score
- 0
Maybe we could hire Joe and Nick to bump him off if he gets off.
I want you to wear them WHILE she is eating them and live blogged too![]()
Maybe we could hire Joe and Nick to bump him off if he gets off.
You might say The Joe and Nick story, interesting, but how can we prove its true?
It isnt for Mr Stewart to have to prove anything. The burden of proof is on the prosecution, to make us sure.
That's it about Joe and Nick. IMHO it is almost as if even the Defense wants the jury to forget about them.
Because RF would run into trouble if he went with the NiJo story and had to describe the rest of IS' behaviour on Monday.
But then, why did he allow IS to take the stand with the tale of Joe and Nick at all?
Wasting out precious lives with details he wasn't going to use in his defense anyway? Or was it just a gift to the Prosecution? (Not intended as such, but that is how it turned out?)
Members of the Jury, most of what my client told you was a collection of balderdash, but never mind, because they loved each other dearly, please read the book, and by the way, he had enough money of his own and hers as well.
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Beyond reasonable doubt. Yes. Not beyond ANY doubt, and surely Strimmer has reduced his *advertiser censored*-and-bull story to a pile of reeking silage.
[h=3]'How can the murder of Helen be financially motivated if Stewart only needed to wait a couple of months and he could have been £1.5million or so better off?'[/h][FONT="]OMG[/FONT] Just catching up and am so annoyed that the defence have been able to use that complete lie.
The insurance policy Helen had meant he'd be no better off waiting till they were married. How are they allowed to pretend that he'd be better off?
Just catching up but I'm really ticked that Russell-Flint can't bring himself to mention Nick and Joe!
He's not finished yet though is he?
Is he or isn't he?
Today was the day for the closing speeches, there is no mention that RF will continue tomorrow.
Let us remind ourselves that our poll shows SIXTY of us would vote guilty and ZERO would vote not guilty.
Translate that to the jury. It's five juries.
There is usually at least one poster (keeping it polite) that pops up in these threads and argues reasonable doubt.
Not one. No one.