gregjrichards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,485
- Reaction score
- 70,539
There should be a mass firing of everyone involved in this disaster.
The council high rise flat developments were built cheaply and quickly, and unfortunately concrete as a material doesn't look attractive for long in our wet climate. However they were high density housing solutions to high density housing problems, ie they replaced the insanitary and overcrowded inner city slums which were being progressively demolished in the 1950s and 1960s.
I suspect a lot of younger Brits simply do not know how bad the UK's housing situation was in the 1940s and 1950s due to the massive loss of housing to German bombing during the war. There was an urgent need to replace that, as well as gradually replacing the slums that remained. Like them or not, but tower blocks were a solution that those problems.
The country's financial situation was also pretty crap. We did not finish paying off US lend-lease loans from WWII until the turn of the present millennium. Almost up to the end of the 1970s we had strict exchange controls in place affecting ordinary citizens, which meant clear limits on how much foreign currency you could buy and how much sterling you could take out of the country. My parents' bank used to publish a small booklet at the beginning of each summer setting out how many lira, pesetas or various types of francs you could buy against fixed exchange rates. And then we had the regular sight of the Chancellor of the Exchequer going cap in hand for bailouts from the IMF. By the end of the 1970s the UK was frankly BUST.
Sky News U.K - Prime Minister's spokesperson 600 high rise buildings in England alone have similar cladding to Grenfell Tower. The three tested so far have been classed as combustible.
An estimated 600 high-rise buildings in England contain cladding similar to that used on a London tower block which caught fire, killing at least 79 people, officials said on Thursday.
Flames spread rapidly up the 24-storey residential Grenfell Tower last week, trapping people inside, in what was Britain's worst blaze since World War Two. Exterior cladding added during a refurbishment may have played a part, residents have said.
Sky News U.K - Prime Minister's spokesperson 600 high rise buildings in England alone have similar cladding to Grenfell Tower. The three tested so far have been classed as combustible.
"Thousands of people are feared to be living in death traps after the government estimated 600 buildings have cladding like that used on fire-ravaged Grenfell Tower.
Samples from seven tower blocks have already tested as flammable and the government is now urgently trying to work out what other people are at risk.
The finding could lead to mass evacuations after Downing Street promised no one will have to live in an unsafe block."
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/downing-street-reveals-600-buildings-10667305
The flames exit through a kitchen window and ignite the siding that goes up as if it was made of napalm. The fire brigade think they have the kitchen fire out. They don't think to look outside. After all, Grenfell was supposed to be almost fireproof.
One of the towers on the estate - called Taplow Tower - caught fire in 2012 but the blaze was contained. It raises the prospect that other factors on Grenfell Tower - as well as the cladding - contributed to its rapid spread.
Yes, I saw the video where the gentleman stated that. He also stated that he personally knew 40 Moroccan families from the tower that were missing (he himself was Moroccan ). I couldn't understand that because, with 6 flats per floor that would have been almost a third of the total occupants IMO that were missing. As of the latest figures 79 missing presumed dead I believe. Hopefully that number will not increase.I'll believe that when it's confirmed by an official source. There's a LOT of fake news still going around.
https://www.buildington.co.uk/new_developments/london_w14/warwick_road/kensington_row/id/3866
I think these properties may have already been intended for social/affordable housing - it' s often required by planners as a quid pro quo for allowing other development. Still, good news for the families, although some may not want to live in a high rise again even if it is brand new and high spec.
It isn't just homes that may have the lethal cladding. Hospitals, schools, libraries etc. could all have it as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Somebody dropped the ball. Perhaps they did not check above 18metres. Flammable cladding is ok up to 18 metres. That could be approximately up to the 9th floor. This started on the 4th floor where flammable cladding is legal. Flammable cladding should be illegal at ANY height imo. Especially when the fumes are so deadly. Fumes don't stay below the 9th floor and it appears the cause of death was mainly those smoke and fumes. A terrible tragedy.The renovations were inspected 16 times over two years:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ions-failed-to-stop-use-of-flammable-cladding
"Millionaire contractors were last night facing claims that they pocketed taxpayers cash to install fireproof cladding only to fit cut-price flammable panels instead.
One local authority said it was considering legal action over the panels installed on several of its high-rise tower blocks, claiming they were not the safe ones it had paid for.
Camden council, in north London, made the allegations against contractor Rydon, which charged £66million to re-fit five of its high-rise blocks at the Chalcots Estate. Rydon was the company behind the controversial refurbishment of the doomed Grenfell Tower in North Kensington.
Harley Facades Ltd, which supplied the cladding panels, was also involved in both jobs.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-corners-pocket-difference.html#ixzz4kmZNTrbH