truthfinder34
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2018
- Messages
- 224
- Reaction score
- 801
it does look like hes waiting for the cars to pass. most cars interior lights come on when a doors are open so he would have been visable to anyone passing.
Morning all.
Couple of thoughts before I start:
1, I'm not convinced the the Newland Avenue CCTV is the same car.
2, If the CCTV is a last ditch effort by Police to get say the cyclist before their time is up with suspect then wouldn't it be more useful to place the appeal on the mobile billboard etc locally?
Also the Hull Daily Mail are saying Police have to charge or release by 21:11 tonight? I thought this could be extended a further 24 hours if needs be or is it the Police will keep that in reserve for later use?
I have a strange feeling that it might be his car but not necessarily him driving it and that's why it's been released. Though why he'd not tell the police who it is in that case, I have no idea.
I'm unable to discern anything much at all from the cctv. I wonder if the spider has been evicted now.
I cant help but think thst its unlikely libby will be found. If the person arrested is gulity of harming Libby he had plently of time to cover his tracks. In the samantha eastwood case they were pretty much on to Stirling straightaway yet they only found her body after he led them to under whilst on bail
Would she even know her postcode by heart after living there for a few months and being so drunk? Something tells me she was unlikely to be wanting a taxi to take her home, she had just walked from home to get to the bench. I think she thought she was heading back to the club. If he told his sister he put her postcode into his satnav I think it's likely to be a lie.
To make it seem like a legitimate account of what he would have done if he was taxiing her anywhere? And not planning to take her somewhere to sexually assault her. IMOIt's a strange detail to add tho, isn't it? Why tell your sister that?
The car pulls off far too quickly for me near the end of the video, particularly when it’s not a main road.
I'd suspect they have probably just cut out the "boring" bits so that people only look at the bits they are interested in getting information on. Additionally it may be that they feel releasing the whole thing might mean some not watching it through properly or concentrating on irrelevant bits. Probably keen only to get responses on the particular important bits.
Yep. I would hope both the car driver and cyclist already came forward especially as there is no appeal for them with the release of this CCTV. Maybe they just didn't notice him there?
The car must belong to a resident living there, or a person visiting a resident as it's not a through street and leaving at that time of night? Maybe overthinking, but he seems to use the car leaving as a signal to get up and make his move.
I don’t think there’s an accomplice involved as it would involve a lot of immediate planning and co-ordination when only a few minutes beforehand they had no idea Libby would be around and on that bench.
They must be able to further track the car journey on CCTV which they haven’t released yet?
But as they are still locally requesting information and people to come forward I assume there must still be a lot of gaps in their knowledge?
Interesting you say that. Yet they did not attach any questions regarding the man to the release of the video. Maybe they fear specific questions might limit responses and they want people to call in with any and all observations they have.
In the video in the Daily Star article I had linked earlier the narrator does say police want to speak to the cyclist as a potential witness.
Yes you're right! As if he had waited for that car to come by. He almost jumps up. Although it could also be that he didn't want to be seen by that driver and waited for him to be gone.
I'm not convinced there's an accomplice either. However, remember the stories about the fake taxis trying to pick people up that weekend (in a blue/black VW) and also the one about the balaclava/taxi incident (not sure whether car description was given?) These may have been the same incident, not sure as I haven't got the links to hand.