Joolz1975
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2019
- Messages
- 1,655
- Reaction score
- 9,885
I agree it seems the complete opposite of what I'm saying ..because I do feel that CCTV is very relevant..the police did not release it though .. even though we can "assume" the police allowed its release.
A further difference is that with that CCTV they stated it could be libby...if they thought one of the people seen on oak rd was with libby they would have said
I don't think if they thought one of the people on oak road CCTV was Libby they would say at all...the complete opposite in fact.
I think they would want a witness to come forward to say it was Libby not state it themselves.