I wonder if he laughed when asked where they had sex/he raped her and how long it lasted because he was embarrassed. He’s embarrassed because he knows he was so aroused that he didn’t last long at all, a ten second wonder as I like to call it.
sorry i have to say no it is never locked, not even during the lockdown when all of the other gates remained locked for months. its always open and it creeps me out in all honesty. it has done for some years.@Corneileus is this gate ever locked? View attachment 281441
And we now know the niceties of removing knickers was avoided. More time saved.I wonder if he laughed when asked where they had sex/he raped her and how long it lasted because he was embarrassed. He’s embarrassed because he knows he was so aroused that he didn’t last long at all, a ten second wonder as I like to call it.
Yes so he had to change his story againI'm a bit confused.
Is that correct poor Libby had her pants on when she was found then?
Why has PR inferred/said she took them off? Why mention them at all?
Thanks for taking one for the teamI will show my ignorance. What is a mic drop?
Well, she could have put them back on after he'd driven off (I know over shoes is a struggle, but not impossible) but it's not quite (for me) the checkmate move I'd first thought. I'm suprised PR would notice, though, that she was holding them as he drove off. Ridiculous to suggest this scenario anyway. So, he suggests she removed them, 'gently threw them' at him, retrieved them, held onto them whilst getting out of the car to kneel on the grass to be sick, continued to hold onto them whilst having consensual sex, and still holding onto them whilst shouty screaming at him not to leave her.But then as prosecution just pointed out she would have to get the over her shoes in that state and it doesnt fit with his earlier statement she walked down road holding them. Too many lies for me...
I think he has a thing about pants based on his previois crimes, and what he said to his friend too about the car.I'm a bit confused.
Is that correct poor Libby had her pants on when she was found then?
Why has PR inferred/said she took them off? Why mention them at all?
He has now admitted she didn't take them off thoughWell, she could have put them back on after he'd driven off (I know over shoes is a struggle, but not impossible) but it's not quite (for me) the checkmate move I'd first thought. I'm suprised PR would notice, though, that she was holding them as he drove off. Ridiculous to suggest this scenario anyway. So, suggests she removed them, 'gently threw them' at him, retrieved them, held onto them whilst getting out of the car to kneel on the grass to be sick, continued to hold onto them whilst having consensual sex, and still holding onto them whilst shouty screaming at him not to leave her.
I will show my ignorance. What is a mic drop?
sorry i have to say no it is never locked, not even during the lockdown when all of the other gates remained locked for months. its always open and it creeps me out in all honesty. it has done for some years.
could be and needs to be for the timings to work. the timings have still not been discussed in detail but it will have to happen. i hope theres an explanation. maybe he was there longer by a couple or three minutes but...there is a chance he himself personally might not have killed her, though he is responsible for not saving her and he raped and abused her in the very least, shouldnt get out of prison.I wonder if he laughed when asked where they had sex/he raped her and how long it lasted because he was embarrassed. He’s embarrassed because he knows he was so aroused that he didn’t last long at all, a ten second wonder as I like to call it.
And we now know the niceties of removing knickers was avoided. More time saved.
What a piece of scum he is
Im querying this too. According to the lifeboat crew that fished her out she was wearing a black sports bra a skirt and trainers so why has the prosecution said she was wearing pants...im soooo confused now. Is this a reporting mistake or what?????I'm a bit confused.
Is that correct poor Libby had her pants on when she was found then?
Why has PR inferred/said she took them off? Why mention them at all?
I believe they are referring to underpants.Im querying this too. According to the lifeboat crew that fished her out she was wearing a black sports bra a skirt and trainers so why has the prosecution said she was wearing pants...im soooo confused now. Is this a reporting mistake or what?????
I think they said that was all they could see. Skirt probaly hid them and as they didn't get her out of water and a specialist boat did unlikely they saw more.Im querying this too. According to the lifeboat crew that fished her out she was wearing a black sports bra a skirt and trainers so why has the prosecution said she was wearing pants...im soooo confused now. Is this a reporting mistake or what?????
it is very dangerous and thick mud which obe can not escape without assistance...if the tide was very low that is. otherwise very strong chance u can not survive a fall in...a few people have, but not many.cornelius, I grew up next to Sutton Bridge but I’ve not lived in Hull for twenty years. I don’t think people realise just how big the river is at that point looking at the photos. If you stand on Sutton Bridge and then Stoneferry bridge and the river at ORPFs is between them you’d understand just how large and fast this river is right?!
(I never even knew ORPFs existed and I lived there till I was fifteen often returning to visit local family)
It’s not coming across on the photos just how frightening this river is