JosieJo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2018
- Messages
- 3,259
- Reaction score
- 22,502
Agreed
That's my problem with the defence case.
On the one hand, a sex predator took her to a location he staked out, took her in there in the freezing cold, raped her, people heard her screaming for some mins, then she is never heard of again until she turns up in the estuary
On the other hand, despite lying about all of the above, we are expected to believe she conveniently jumped in the river - based on no evidence
I think the defence needs to prove it more likely that he had no time to get her in the river if he is to get off. Otherwise, it seems clear what happened
Absolutely...I do have more doubts though in relation to her falling into the river..I think there is a lot of evidence to support that she was falling to the ground, incoherent, confused...then there is the icy ground , and poor lightning.. obviously if this was daylight with a person fully functioning normally those doubts for me would be less ...especially as if the timings are possible its more likely she was quite near the river at the time of the attack
Last edited: