UK - Logan Mwangi, 5, found dead in Wales River, Bridgend, 31 July 2021 *arrests, inc. minor* #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
She has had ample time to tell the truth since they have all been locked up.

No one devastated by their child's death would have been watching those youtube videos.

i don’t think he was dead at that point.
We don’t have any evidence she was the one turning light on and off at that point either. As the youth and her boyfriend were also in the house
 
I'm not sure from the last update of the day whether the youth's counsel was referring to AW's youtube history or the youth's.

It sounds as if AW is denying she was using her phone, but I can't see why his defence would be submitting data that makes the case for him using her phone even worse.

Not the best reporting today.

i think they had to send it in?
 
15:17PHILIP DEWEY
CCTV of daylight hours
Following a lengthy, legal discussion away from the jury, Caroline Rees QC asks for CCTV footage from the daylight hours of July 31, 2021, to be played to the jury, who have now returned to court.


15:25PHILIP DEWEY
Cross examination
John Hipkin QC, for the youth defendant, cross examines Michelle Claxton.

He makes reference to the curtains in Logan’s bedroom opening after Cole and his client leave the house, with Cole holding Logan’s body.

The barrister said there was a 54 second gap between Cole and the youth leaving the house and the curtains opening.

Ms Claxton confirms this.

Mr Hipkin also referred to Williamson viewing 17 YouTube videos.

He said: “They show esoteric interests don’t they?”

Ms Claxton said: “Yes.”

The barrister runs through the topics of the videos.

These included:

“Spoon used to remove man’s cyst”

“Dr Pimple Popper”

“Large black head extraction”

“Professional make-up artist”

“BMW”

“Conjoined sisters”

“Pain Management”

“TMI accessory tragus removal”

“Cleaning big long toenail”.


15:25PHILIP DEWEY
Videos
Mr Hipkins said: “There’s an issue about whether it’s Angharad Williamson (using the phone). Can you just confirm you were sent a schedule by the defence (for the youth) to check to see what pattern of YouTube activity there was in the past?”

Ms Claxton said: “Yes.”

Mr Hipkins continued: “The data you were given was between June 2 and August 1, 2021.”

He said that during this time, Dr Pimple Popper videos had been viewed 27 times.

The “Large black head extraction” video had been viewed 140 times between 2019 and 2021.

The court was also told toenail videos had been viewed three times between June and August 2021.

Ms Rees says the trial cannot proceed further today so the jury are sent home.

The trial will resume tomorrow morning.


Boy's bedroom light 'switched on and off' before body removed, jury told

Wow! Looks like it could be very likely it wasn’t her using her phone then…
 
She is not remotely innocent! The nearest thing she gets to being innocent is that perhaps she didn't deal the fatal blow to her son.

For any mother who sees her son collapsing, staggering around, groaning in pain, bleeding, passing out, weeping, struggling for breath... and DOES NOT ring for immediate assistance, she is already complicit in causing death.

For any mother who is aware that a grown violent man and a grown violent teen have mercilessly attacked her tiny boy and severely injured him and does not immediately ask the police to handle the situation and get her and her baby to a place of safety, she is already complicit in causing death.

For any mother who decides after her little boy has died to comply with an insane childish ill thought out cover up scam perpetrated by violent criminals and murderers, intending to frame an innocent woman for abduction to boot... there are no words.

Where in this timeline of days of violence, insanity, and evil doing is the part where AW was 'innocent' ? The only bit she didn't take part in is putting Logan in the river.
 
Wow! Looks like it could be very likely it wasn’t her using her phone then…

To avoid confusion, I'll reiterate what was posted earlier..........

"On Thursday, jurors were told about the "schedule of events" that happened around the time of the killing - including a number of videos watched on YouTube - that had been accessed from the Google account of Logan's mum Williamson.

Cardiff Crown Court heard that the videos watched included "Spoon used to remove man’s cyst”, “Dr Pimple Popper” and “Cleaning big long toenail”. There is dispute over who was using Williamson’s phone to access the videos, but analysis of the defendant’s phone prior to the night in question revealed she had watched similar videos including Dr Pimple Popper and videos of a surgical and medical nature.
And the prosecution has not been able to establish whether these videos were watched before or after Logan had died. However, it presented the evidence as part of what was going on in the flat at the time of the killing.

List of YouTube videos watched the night boy was allegedly murdered
 
Video views and bedroom visits timeline.

12.20am: Williamson accesses the Samsung One Home app

12.25: Williamson accesses Facebook app

12.29am: Williamson watches YouTube video

12.36am: Logan’s bedroom light comes on

12.38am: Light goes off

12.41am: Logan’s bedroom light comes on

12.42am: Light goes off

12.46am: Williamson accesses YouTube

12.51am: Williamson watches YouTube video entitled “Spoon is used to remove man’s cyst… Dr Pimple Popper”

12.52.am: Williamson accesses app management notification

1.10am: Williamson accesses Facebook

1.17am: Williamson watches a series of YouTube videos entitled “Large black head abstraction”, “You have never seen ice cream cake made like this”

1.19am: Williamson watches YouTube video “Professional make-up artist, how to look beautiful”.

1.20am: Williamson watches YouTube videos “Not your average BMW E38” and “Viral shorts”

1.21am: Logan’s bedroom light comes on and off

1.22am: Williamson accesses Samsung One Home app

1.23am: Williamson accesses YouTube

1.24am: Williamson watches YouTube video “Conjoined sister born as one now thriving as two”

1.29am: Williamson watches YouTube video “My twin is only four foot three, born different”

1.31am: Williamson watches YouTube video “German lady wants a nose job to look African”

1.40am: Williamson watches YouTube video “Three friends Simon wrong in powerful operatic” and a “Dr Pimple Popper” video

1.41am: Williams watches YouTube video “The cutting and removal and cleaning big long toe nail and various other videos.

1.49am: Light comes on in Logan’s bedroom

1.50am: Light goes off in Logan’s bedroom

2.08am: Light comes on in Logan’s bedroom

2.10am: Light goes off

2.14am: Williamson accesses YouTube.

2.20am: Light comes on in Logan’s bedroom

2.21am: Light goes off

2.22am: Light comes on in Logan’s bedroom

2.24am: Williamson accesses Samsung One Home app

2.26am: Access Samsung Android dialler app

2.43am, John Cole and the youth defendant are seen walking up the side path to 5 Lower Llansantffraid. Crown says Cole is carrying Logan’s body.

List of YouTube videos watched the night boy was allegedly murdered
 
From the link just posted by Tedtink. Clarifies the opening/closing of Logan’s curtains from 26th
 

Attachments

  • 4B0AE5B5-DD65-49BF-BB2F-3DD71DF6B19A.png
    4B0AE5B5-DD65-49BF-BB2F-3DD71DF6B19A.png
    343.2 KB · Views: 24
2.26 the dialler app is accessed is this where she is about to call 999 but is stopped
You tube is not accessed again.
I can’t help but think that the coke and the teen have threatened her and the baby
The other option is that Logan is not dead don’t forget the following day she screams you told me he was alive
 
2.26 the dialler app is accessed is this where she is about to call 999 but is stopped
You tube is not accessed again.
I can’t help but think that the coke and the teen have threatened her and the baby
The other option is that Logan is not dead don’t forget the following day she screams you told me he was alive

It's not impossible Cole told AW he was putting logan outside as he was badly injured to pretend someone took him and carried out those injuries... not that it alters the culpability but just and scenario
 
2.26 the dialler app is accessed is this where she is about to call 999 but is stopped
You tube is not accessed again.
I can’t help but think that the coke and the teen have threatened her and the baby
The other option is that Logan is not dead don’t forget the following day she screams you told me he was alive
She had been acting all morning, on the 999 call, when police arrived, at the hospital. All in furtherance of making out she knew absolutely nothing about his death. No mother would change her dying sons pyjamas and leave him dumped in the freezing river for 4 hours thinking he's still alive. Police didn't tell her he was in the water but she knew.
 
It's not impossible Cole told AW he was putting logan outside as he was badly injured to pretend someone took him and carried out those injuries... not that it alters the culpability but just and scenario

Not really because then AW went on about 'I should have taught him to swim' etc prior to being told Logan was located.

Also, it struck me that when officers informed her they were trying to save Logan, she became terrified that he was maybe somehow alive and going to be revived.
 
I didn't realise there's only two bedrooms in AW's house. So, there's AW and the baby, JC, the Youth, and Logan. Two adults, one with a string of convictions, one violent and disturbed youth, a lively energetic infant and a tiny baby. In two bedrooms. Is there even a downstairs space or semblance of privacy for the Youth ? Was he bunking in with Logan?
Not a tiny baby - he was born in January 2020 so a toddler.
 
It's not impossible Cole told AW he was putting logan outside as he was badly injured to pretend someone took him and carried out those injuries... not that it alters the culpability but just and scenario

This is probably her best chance at a defence imo, but even if the jury accepts this version of events I think they could still find her guilty of causing/allowing the death of a child.
 
Trial Transcript
11:13PHILIP DEWEY
Detective sergeant in digital forensic investigations gives evidence
The trial resumes.

The first witness to give evidence is Scot Anderson, who is giving evidence via video link.

He is detective sergeant in digital forensic investigations at South Wales Police.

On August 1, 2021, he began carrying out investigations of digital devices belonging to Cole, Williamson and the youth defendant.

The devices included a Samsung Galaxy S5 belonging to John Cole, a black Samsung Galaxy Prime belonging to the youth defendant, and a Samsung Galaxy A12 in a pink glitter case belonging to Angharad Williamson, a Galaxy A32, and a Galaxy tab.

Prosecutor Caroline Rees QC asks about a review into Williamson’s phone and Cloud data.

DS Anderson reviewed the report of Google activity on Williamson’s phone including internet browsing and YouTube activity.

A video entitled “Large black head extraction….” had been viewed at 1.17am on July 31, 2021.

Videos with the words “black head” in its title had been viewed around 140 times since November 8, 2019.

Phones belonging to Cole and the youth were also analysed to see if videos involving “black heads” or “Dr Pimple Popper” had been viewed, but no videos of this description had been accessed.

On May 4, 2021, Williamson sent a photograph of a hand and engagement ring sent to a contact.

A typed message to the same contact read: “Hiya hunny, sorry I have not been in contact much this year…. With Covid it’s been a manic year. Hope you’re well, you are always in my thoughts. I’m always telling Jay stories about what we used to get up to”.

The court heard in between these two messages, Williamson’s phone accessed a Dr Pimple Popper video about black heads.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trial Transcript
Cross examination for Cole - 'Assist the jury'

David Elias QC, for Cole, cross examines DS Anderson.

He makes reference to the “Large black head extraction….” video and asks the officer he was looking for “patterns of viewing”

Mr Elias said: “What you found was it appeared on the device linked to Angharad Williamson that on 140 occasions from November 8, 2019, similar black head videos had been viewed.”

DS Anderson said: “That’s right.”

Mr Elias said: “The reason to do this was to assist the jury who might have been using that phone in the early hours of July 31, 2021.”

DS Anderson said: “That’s right.”

Peter Rouch QC, for Williamson, refers to a report from expert witness Matthew Jackson who is instructed on behalf of Williamson

The barrister said: “All of that (phone) information came from the report of Mr Jackson didn’t it. All you did was repeat and replicate Mr Jackson’s report.”

DS Anderson said: “Yes I verified his information and replicated it.”

The witness has finished his evidence and the court adjourns for a 15 minute break.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
89
Guests online
443
Total visitors
532

Forum statistics

Threads
608,048
Messages
18,233,567
Members
234,275
Latest member
MaestraV
Back
Top