Like with many other minor details in this case, it's only relevant if she's guilty.
The relevance is that she purchased a house in March 2016, in the middle of the alleged June 2015 - June 2016 charges, that is the very house that is directly behind the baby memorial garden in a very large cemetery. It's literally the closest house possible to this little baby garden. In the winter when the trees between her garden and the memorial garden were bare, she would have been able to view it from her upstairs windows. I think this is relevant given that the prosecution allege she enjoyed watching the aftermath of deaths, including the Facebook searches. It is also relevant in that if guilty, serial killers often like to be near the bodies of their victims.
Also, when she purchased this house, there was already a children's bedroom with this design on the wall:
<modsnip: No link; ALL images require a link to source>
Which looks very like the owls in Nursery 2, where several of the babies were allegedly attacked:
<modsnip: No link; ALL images require a link to source>
If guilty, I cannot see any of this as a coincidence. JMO.
The interesting thing here; I was looking at the decor on this one room at her house only yesterday, and thinking about what was said about the memorial being right behind the house.
Then we have the dozens of handovers, the shredder in the spare bedroom, the condolence card she kept a picture of on her phone..(I can’t recall the defence presenting lots of the “other” pics of cards she’d sent and kept photos of them, unless I missed it!)
The bedroom with the owl decor *could* have been from previous owner but as you point out; it’s eerily very similar to the nursery at the hospital you have shared- and secondly, the bedroom decor im sure is a wall sticker/stencil I’ve seen in shops/online before. There’s nothing to say she could have bought this wall stencil as a mock-up to replicate the scene at the hospital. If guilty.
If guilty, it’s very weird that she also so happens to have the house which overlooks this memorial, wanted to go to the funeral of one of the babies listed in the charges and also has a book “supporting friend with grief” (or title along those lines). If guilty she is also (in groups and quick succession) searching like some strange stalking behaviour the parents of babies who have died, been harmed, or whose twin is still even on the unit.
She is also the only one present for all these cases.
What are the odds or even coincidences that the accused happens to have that very house in that location around the time these events were happening- which makes me wonder if that house belonged to someone she may have known or IF she was lodging there at any point prior to the events. Could it be someone she knows and she was then living there and took over/paying the mortgage?
Has she lost a baby herself, a twin, has someone close to her (or even she lived with) lost a baby?
I keep thinking back to dr choc and the things on those notes;
. I trusted you with everything
. I loved you
What is ^^^^ “trusted with everything”?
The whole case is quite vague in places but there appears to be definitely something very strange about where she was living, the charges, the lies, how these babies came to harm, the text messages, the card she saved on her phone and sent on the day of the funeral.
She said;
“Nobody will ever understand what happened or why”
“I’m evil” and the “I did this on purpose”
Really very odd and when you think about the “rest breaks” she’s needed throughout the trial, disappears after lunch during the trial and didn’t come back, the judge says “not to concern yourself with” etc.
I genuinely feel there is SO much more going on here IMO
JMO if guilty.
Moo