Rationally and logically, I can accept they are doing the best they can and are figuring things out.I have no problem them taking as long as they need to ensurejustice. ..but that doesn't stop me feeling selfishly frustrated wether I have any right to or not.
The problem is not GP appointments, it could be consultant appointments in hospital that have a 4 month waiting list.Yes UK based. Pretty sure I could find a way round it if I was motivated tbh. Just got to be a little bit pushy. You can also get a Dr online at any time of day if you pay £15. Not like you get to see your own Dr these days any how!
Don't lose heart folks. This took the jury 19 days of deliberations with just 2 cases.
The Sixth Commandment finale: Ben Field's verdict, explained
The BBC true crime drama charts Ben Field's wicked crimes.www.radiotimes.com
His co-accused, 32-year-old magician Martyn Smith, was found not guilty of the same charge - and the pair were together cleared of a charge of conspiracy to murder retired headteacher Ann Moore-Martin.
Field was also acquitted of her attempted murder, but had admitted seducing and defrauding her in a similar fashion to how he targeted her neighbour Mr Farquhar.
Field's brother Tom, 24, a Cambridge University graduate, was cleared of a single charge of fraud.
They were told in relation to the insulin question that they can't receive any information not already in evidence, so maybe they've taken that to heart?I was actually thinking this yesterday @Tortoise - they’ve only asked, what - 3/4 questions? One of which was for a copy of the judges closing summary. They’ve not asked many “specifics” at all. The only two I can think of was the question RE the insulin, and the question RE the fathers & doctors statements.
I half expected them to have more questions tbh.
It doesn't necessarily work that way. More hours doesn't necessarily equate to a faster decision.I agree completely. If they’d had 8 hour days they’d all be done by now and off on their summer holidays or enjoying this beautiful weather. Instead there is another appointment so important that it cannot wait for even one more week until a verdict is reached.
MOO
I have no problem them taking as long as they need to ensure justice. ..but that doesn't stop me feeling selfishly frustrated whether I have any right to or not.
We are all for the Babies here.Anxiety that this will end up in mistrial or a hung jury may be what's causing some impatience here.
But they have 22 charges to discuss. That's huge.
Maybe allowing them some time for appointments they need is also just necessary -- for their health.
I get it- anxiety is my middle name. But we should be thankful for this jury. There's no reason to think they don't understand the seriousness of their current job.
Everyone take some time to relax this weekend and hope for the best next week.
He literally wrote about how he was plotting to kill her in his diaries.Not sure they did, as they went with the evidence.
There have been several NHS hospital scandals in recent years. This is nothing new.I think the PUBLIC needs answers.
Society needs answers because this case concerns NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE.
National =PUBLIC
Every worker pays in taxes for Health Service and needs to know what really happened in this hospital.
Because, the next time it might be somebody he/she loves or YOU.
So it is not only parents' of the victims right, but ALL citizens of the UK.
JmO
There were two co-accused in that case who were acquitted on multiple charges, so that might have been what kept the jury bogged down for a while:
Maids Moreton trial: 'Evil' Ben Field guilty of murdering lecturer he seduced
Ben Field became engaged to Peter Farquhar, gave him drugs to confuse him, and then inherited his home after killing him.news.sky.com
Is it that complex though reallyI am remaining positive and hopeful that there will be a verdict, the jury have not been out that long considering the complexities of the case. Please stay positive, a pot half full is much better than one half empty
You know,There have been several NHS hospital scandals in recent years. This is nothing new.
I think, IF guilty, LL was more cunning and sly than Alitt was. Alitt didnt make much of an effort to change up her MO, or to try and camouflage her actions. LL changed things up continuously, allegedly using various attack methods and allegedly targeting babies under the care of other colleagues, successfully prolonging the crime spree.Is it that complex though really
Seems pretty cut and dried to me, personally.
The Shipman (6 days) and Alitt (32 hours over 6 days) juries had similar numbers of cases but deliberated for far less time.