JuicyLucy
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2021
- Messages
- 1,491
- Reaction score
- 10,384
This is a general response. I tagged it to your informative post. Hope you don't mind @JuicyLucy
I think it is of little relevance for the public to know when OD was last identified on CCTV.
The reality is the CCTV may not be great and could undermine the public recognising OD.
The CCTV on London Road from 7th July at approx 12:30, I recall, is great video of OD. That's all the public need to see along with updates of the general areas OD may be. It's purely for identification of OD. We don't need a running commentary of CCTV showing exactly where she was seen, how she looked, what she was doing etc.
I don't mind at all
And I'm sure that you're right in your analysis of the police perspective on this. But don't you think there'd be merit in 'keeping the flame alive' as it were? I think with all complex missing enquiries, there's always a risk of public fatigue. Owami's case had suffered from a tremendous lack of media and social media attention but in the last week that's really changed and the number of people who have seen her face has dramatically increased. Yet she still hasn't been found, and there must be a worry that interest will wane again before she is.
Without putting out low quality pics and without narrowing the focus in a way that ends up misdirecting the enquiry, I think it would be helpful, if at all possible, to put out a statement saying, e.g. that they think she may be travelling up and down to X, or that there's been a strictly unconfirmed sighting of her at Y, or that they have reason to think she may still have been alive on August the xxth.
I just think that in an enquiry where they're really relying on the engagement of the public, they need to get with the 21st century a bit in terms of how you use the media to keep everyone watching. Otherwise, now that everyone's had an opportunity to criticise the Met and tweet platitudes about BLM and how beautiful she is, they will get bored and move on imo.