skibaboo
Mrs Map
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 10,704
- Reaction score
- 4,969
Can we just remember at the point that the allegation would have been made she was 13 years old and had not committed any crimes (as far as we know). She was a CHILD. I'm not 'guilt-tripping', it just feels uncomfortable to question the child she once was, and opens a can of worms in my opinion. Where do you draw the line?
I wasn't, I was querying the court procedure and what the judge was basing his words on. AFAIK we haven't been told prior to this that SH was raped at 13. "Attacked on the way to/from School" is all I recall?