sar2them1984
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,216
- Reaction score
- 513
Can you link to this - I can't find itDifferent bags comment perhaps? Read the other article in the Bristol Post, the one that talks about 30 bags.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you link to this - I can't find itDifferent bags comment perhaps? Read the other article in the Bristol Post, the one that talks about 30 bags.
More to the point - who was looking over the fence and why. I'm wondering if it has been misconstrued again and was actually reported by on the the people living in the flats which overlook their house and garden?If the body was well wrapped in the garden with no noticeable smell, how come a stranger looked over the fence and reported what they saw?
Super nosey neighbour.If the body was well wrapped in the garden with no noticeable smell, how come a stranger looked over the fence and reported what they saw?
To me the most puzzling aspect of this whole thing is why on earth they still had the body.As a teenager growing up my brother and I were always taught never to crap on our own doorstep - I. E don't bring trouble to our home. It wasn't applicable to me as I was a good girl but anyway..
It doesn't take much intelligence to know that dismembering/storing a body for any length of time in your own home isn't the greatest of ideas
Firstly, you've got to live in the property (with your child might I add) after the event. A constant reminder I should have thought
And secondly if found it provides a direct link to you as the dwellers of that property.
So either the individuals are of incredibly low intelligence which they don't seem to be or there was another reason for the body to be stored at BC property. I wonder what this was? Also bearing in mind that there's plenty of open spaces around and JI lives right on the edge of Avonmouth - industrial estate heaven
Anyone else notice that SH(P) is getting a harder time than NM both on MSM and social media??? Despite him being the one charged with the actual murder...!!
Wonder why.......maybe because she's a female??
Interesting.....
But isn't BW's phone and/or tablet missing as well? Unless we are given more info in regards to those missing devices, i can't really subscribe to this theory. I'm not saying it's wrong, but if this person (who took the laptop) took the other device(s)as well.. I can't really imagine why they'd have to take more than one device if all they wanted to do was search the internet. JMO [emoji4]I have a theory as to why the laptop was removed from BW's house. Having murdered her, NM may have googled 'how to hide body/ dismember body/ hide evidence' and needed to get rid of this evidence, knowing her computer searches would otherwise be discovered when police were called.
As a teenager growing up my brother and I were always taught never to crap on our own doorstep - I. E don't bring trouble to our home. It wasn't applicable to me as I was a good girl but anyway..
It doesn't take much intelligence to know that dismembering/storing a body for any length of time in your own home isn't the greatest of ideas
Firstly, you've got to live in the property (with your child might I add) after the event. A constant reminder I should have thought
And secondly if found it provides a direct link to you as the dwellers of that property.
So either the individuals are of incredibly low intelligence which they don't seem to be or there was another reason for the body to be stored at BC property. I wonder what this was? Also bearing in mind that there's plenty of open spaces around and JI lives right on the edge of Avonmouth - industrial estate heaven
Different bags comment perhaps? Read the other article in the Bristol Post, the one that talks about 30 bags.
But isn't BW's phone and/or tablet missing as well? Unless we are given more info in regards to those missing devices, i can't really subscribe to this theory. I'm not saying it's wrong, but if this person (who took the laptop) took the other device(s)as well.. I can't really imagine why they'd have to take more than one device if all they wanted to do was search the internet. JMO [emoji4]
Super nosey neighbour.
Usually go by the nickname 'radar'.
Perhaps they saw the occupants going out to check on something and decided to look themselves.
To me the most puzzling aspect of this whole thing is why on earth they still had the body.
What stopped them dumping the body?
That makes sense. He could've thought it would make it look like BW ran away or was abducted when she went out.The phone will have been taken by NM to make it look as though she left the house with it. As for the tablet, I only remember reading that it may have been missing?
Apologies - poor wording by me. I should have said 'indicate' rather than prove.
The intention of my original post was to ponder what made the LE think that NM had kidnapped RW. There must have been something pointing specifically towards RW being taken. IMO.
...which leads me on to ........... admittedly I am more rural than Barton Court, but if I had left anything out in a bag, overnight, I can guarantee it would have been inspected by * nightlife of the animal variety * by morning.