GUILTY UK - Rebecca Watts, 16, Bristol, 19 Feb 2015 #5

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Two stun guns ! it just gets worse

Worth noting theres no indication yet that the stun guns were actually used in the murder! They might just have found them in searching the house and decided to bring additional charges (a bit like with the alleged child *advertiser censored* images).
 
Worth noting theres no indication yet that the stun guns were actually used in the murder! They might just have found them in searching the house and decided to bring additional charges (a bit like with the alleged child *advertiser censored* images).

Yes, I did wonder about that. On the one hand it does seem a little strange to add them as a charge, if they are not relevant to the murder. On the other, as they are illegal I suppose there is a case for saying that they should be part of the charges.
Either way, makes me think, yet again, there is far more to this murder than simply one dreadful action by NM.
 
Worth noting theres no indication yet that the stun guns were actually used in the murder! They might just have found them in searching the house and decided to bring additional charges (a bit like with the alleged child *advertiser censored* images).

Whilst that is of course true, just the possession of them would make you question the psyche of the person; why have one, let alone two, if you didn't plan to use them? I'm not arguing that the possession of guns or knives is any better, but with those things it is easier to get my head around the fact that they could be used as a form of self-defence in certain circumstances. To me, illegal possession of a stun gun seems more predatory in nature. All in my opinion of course & pretty circumstantial without some other evidence.
 
[video=twitter;651716370497949696]https://twitter.com/rupertevelyn/status/651716370497949696[/video]
 
[video=twitter;651716718868475905]https://twitter.com/rupertevelyn/status/651716718868475905[/video]
 
[video=twitter;651716925601529856]https://twitter.com/rupertevelyn/status/651716925601529856[/video]
 
[video=twitter;651718719685722112]https://twitter.com/rupertevelyn/status/651718719685722112[/video]
 
[video=twitter;651719095558238209]https://twitter.com/rupertevelyn/status/651719095558238209[/video]
 
[video=twitter;651717336714616832]https://twitter.com/rupertevelyn/status/651717336714616832[/video]
 
[video=twitter;651717228338020352]https://twitter.com/jonkay01/status/651717228338020352[/video]
 
[video=twitter;651718836006322177]https://twitter.com/jonkay01/status/651718836006322177[/video]


I find this bizarre....

he does all the above, but says he did not murder her ??
 
Many of us surmised that Becky did not leave the house alive.
 
[video=twitter;651725783719911424]https://twitter.com/jonkay01/status/651725783719911424[/video]
 
NM basically admitting the lesser charge of manslaughter but denying murder in the hope that can't be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. Absolutely grotesque reading.
 
Hang on, I thought Becky was seen to leave the house (or certainly heard to leave the house) by stepmum? I thought she'd gone missing from the family home and we were told there had been other family members present that day. Am I mixing cases up? Or has she been taken out of the house, dead, without anyone noticing?
 
NM basically admitting the lesser charge of manslaughter but denying murder in the hope that can't be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. Absolutely grotesque reading.

AKA the Ian Huntley/Mark Bridger defence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
1,696
Total visitors
1,837

Forum statistics

Threads
605,913
Messages
18,194,823
Members
233,643
Latest member
Stewsj
Back
Top