ArianeEmory
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2013
- Messages
- 5,741
- Reaction score
- 7,124
I'm really confused as DNA results also take weeks to process... so I'm not sure I understand how the police were able to announce to the media and public that they definitively found TB's remains. Is it possible for DNA results to have come back so quickly? Could those remains (size of box and remains unclear; could be shoe box of ashes) have been DM's father's?
The police have been sharing a lot of evidence with the general public and not allowing this case to be tried by the court of law; instead making it a circus of public opinion. The way they publicize evidence here in this case and yet with Toronto's mayor (who is also being investigated for murder) they are respecting the process and not releasing evidence to the media... What gives?
1) LE has actually pretty much clammed up about the case, particularly after Mark Smich's arrest. We had the "CYA" presser with Carbone in which basically no info was given. Otherwise nothing official in weeks, which is why SB's interview is getting picked over so heavily for clues.
2) I think this is an example of the "CSI effect", people expecting every piece of evidence to be based on hard forensic/DNA proof, but the wording of the discovery of TB's remains was "the totality of the evidence suggests"...that they were his. In short, I don't think they had "hard" scientific proof at the time they made the announcement, but probably other evidence that made it obvious. And of course we STILL don't know for sure what other tests have been concluded now, or even in what condition his remains were found, other than "burned beyond recognition", which isn't exactly scientific nomenclature either.