passionflower
Verified Insider
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,756
- Reaction score
- 11,520
Federal jury convicts former street preacher of kidnapping Elizabeth Smart eight years ago, rejects insanity plea http://bit.ly/hJf6tl
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ive been watching HLN ..they are interviewing Jean C. right now, they said that JVM will be interviewing ES's dad soon..
BTW..something I learned today..and that on the STATE level, BM was found NG due to Mental Illness.....Yikes..I am so glad Federally, he was held accountable!! Good job done to get this deviant OFF the streets forever more!! :woohoo:
Elizabeth you rock !ELIZABETH SMART WANTS TO BE A PROSECUTOR!!!
Her father just announced that Elizabeth's almost has her degree in music.
But plans to go on to be a Prosecuter LAWYER!!!
Let's be so proud of her!
You go girl!!!
Elizabeth you rock !
That kind of inspiration is what I love.I'll say!! People that channel horrendous experiences into good have my utmost admiration!!! Hats off to this incredible woman!
December 14, 2010
Contact: Tricia Griffith
801-*******
tgrif@xmission.com
THE FORGOTTEN VICTIM IN THE ELIZABETH SMART CASE
Richard Riccis Widow Angela Speaks Out About Ed Smart
All Angela Ricci ever wanted from Ed and Lois Smart was an apology -- a heartfelt apology for what happened to her loved one in the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping case.
Angelas husband, Richard Ricci, did not kidnap Elizabeth Smart. Yet for at least 8 months he was the only suspect in her kidnapping.
Richard Ricci died in prison. He was sent to prison when his parole was revoked because he drank beer. While incarcerated, he was questioned relentlessly about Elizabeth Smarts disappearance. In fact, some would say the pressure to get him to admit he kidnapped Elizabeth was so great that it caused his deadly brain aneurysm, which eventually killed him.
Ed and Lois Smart knew, before Elizabeth came home, that Richard Ricci did not commit this crime. They knew this when their daughter Mary Katherine, the only witness to Elizabeths kidnapping, told her father it wasnt Richard. She told him that is was Immanuel, a drifter who the Smarts hired to work at their home, and they believed her. (This information ultimately led to Elizabeth Smarts rescue from her kidnappers.)
On Saturday December 11th 2010, Ed Smart told a TV news anchor that Richard Ricci was not forthcoming in the investigation into Elizabeths kidnapping. Angela Ricci was watching that newscast.
In reaction to Ed Smarts comment, Angela said, That is an out-and-out lie. As soon as the police questioned Richard, he admitted he stole some items from the Smart home. He assumed if he was honest and upfront, the police would move on and find the real kidnapper. The ONLY thing Richard would not do is say he kidnapped Elizabeth. What Richard did was wrong and I was hurt when I found out, but he didnt kidnap Elizabeth and he didnt deserve to die in prison. How can you be forthcoming, as Ed Smart would say, for something you didnt do? He was as forthcoming as he could be without making something up.
So one must ask: Why is it so difficult for Ed Smart to tell Angela Ricci he is sorry? Wouldnt he be a true Christian if he reached out to Angela with such an apology? Yet he seems determined to keep the knife in Angelas heart and twist it when he gets the chance.
Angela Ricci has always taken the high road. She has never criticized the Smarts, and her (and her late husbands) main concern all along was the safe return of Elizabeth Smart, which finally occurred.
Ed and Lois have their loved one back, and now they and Elizabeth got their justice. But Angela Ricci and her son no longer have their loved one, nor have they been given justice concerning this case. An apology -- thats all Angela wants. Why wont Ed Smart give her one? Maybe someone should ask him that question on a TV newscast.
# # #
I think it's important that Tricia remind us all of the dangers of false assumptions.
But as for apologies, I'm afraid I don't see what the Smarts are obligated to do.
Does anyone actually believe they knowingly accused this man falsely? Yes, their daughter identified "Immanuel", but she was young and they must have thought she could have been mistaken. Surely we expect the parents of a missing child to give LE any and all info that might possibly be of some use.
Did LE mistreat Mr. Ricci? Perhaps, though certainly his own history contributed to what ensued.
But as for the Smarts, I don't see what they did wrong.