?mysterian?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2016
- Messages
- 3,103
- Reaction score
- 15,333
@?mysterian?
I cut and pasted your post--bolded my response--hope this one comes out right
post: 15229250, member: 178399 You're right, there's a lot we don't know.
Re: a possible accomplice: So far, LE has only arrested/charged AA in this case. If someone else is possibly involved, we haven't heard about it. True--but they do keep saying the investigation has just begun, that there is much to do and they did keep it to themselves for two days that they found her remains. They are pretty darned good at keeping a lid on things
Re: a different vehicle: When LE executed the first search warrant at AA's house, they towed his vehicle, presumably to gather evidence/process it as part of their investigation, IIRC. ( For documentation purposes, this information was linked/discussed in previous threads.) If another vehicle is involved (on AA's part), we haven't heard about it. Also true. I do remember a picture though of LE looking in the trunk of the Corolla though as well. We also know there were at least two trips relating to this case--the trip to his house and the trip to the canyon. We have hardly a clue as to what was found inside the home or the car except for the gas can and ammo do we? Most of what we know of and which was shared with us was found outside the home and in the alley. Again, they are very good at keeping a lid on things.
Like other recent cases, LE seems to be withholding lots of information, IMO, which is not necessarily a bad idea. Especially in this case, AA could've been determined to be a flight risk and LE probably didn't want to tip him off that he was under investigation. Whether or not AA is smart enough to figure that out on his own is another story . Agree here too. I don't have an alternative theory, again, just pointing out missing pieces. I don't think I have even given my theory in recent days since having additional information, other than to say I don't think she was injured severely at the park nor were they meeting for breakfast.
You did it!
LE has done an impressive job so far, IMO. They've released just enough information to keep the public updated about the case without presenting too much and possibly giving away important details or alerting AA that they were focusing on him. If AA goes to trial, I'm sure we'll be amazed at the amount of evidence/data LE has obtained.
As with other cases, the goal is the successful prosecution of anyone involved in committing this crime. If that means withholding information until the trial(s), that's fine, IMO.
I'd like to read your theory when you're ready to post it.
ETA: of course, all this withholding of information doesn't satisfy my intense curiosity to know as much as I can about this case, but that's just selfish of me.
Last edited: