courtneyb
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2012
- Messages
- 969
- Reaction score
- 36
Ok, so if not wh then who? Give me an insight because I Have tunnel vision...serious statement.
From what I can tell, we cannot discuss anyone here besides WH.
Ok, so if not wh then who? Give me an insight because I Have tunnel vision...serious statement.
I don't know, Zapped...but I'd come bail you out.![]()
In New York We have to "blow the water" out of our sprinkler pipes in the fall. They can't freeze.I am on the opposite coast too but I would doubt it. It seems to be that you would only need one in the spring/ summer if any of the pipes had broken. I think they can break from frozen water in them expanding but you wouldn't be likely to find that out until you had tried to use them and you wouldn't try to use them when it is still near freezing temps. Anyone from the East coast know?
I believe the decision to allow us to sleuth/discuss WH was based on the fact that he's been named as a suspect in previous LE investigations, with a violent, criminal history. I don't want to speak for anyone in an official capacity here at WS but in all the cases I've ever followed this is a very odd circumstance where he's considered both victim (parent of missing person) and previously convicted suspect in a case that has been discussed on this site.
I appreciate the TOS here and the tough decisions the mods have to make, especially in super-weird cases like this one.
BBM- How would WH know on which side of the driveway AJ parked when she returned from the gas station or when the neighbor saw her return at 2pm? If you believe his story, AJ would have parked twice in the driveway- once after she "departed" him, once when she was seen at 2pm. So how can he be sure it was "moved" from left to right side?
I find it striking that a few WS members who have not posted here at all from the beginning of this case until now, express reluctance to suspect WH as the #1 suspect. While, those of us who have followed this case from day 1 have wrestled with all the information and for the most part, we're all seeing ourselves looking right back at WH.
I'd honestly like to hear the thoughts of those who have just recently begun to comment. What is it specifically that you're seeing that you think many of us are not seeing? I believe fresh eyes are always good in any case, and this one is no exception.
I look forward to your thoughts.
WH hasn't been named a suspect by LE. His charges so far stem from breaking into a house he believed AJ was seen, JMO but that is excusable behavior for a dad. Right? No. But when you are desperately looking for your child, you just might be willing to do anything to save your child's life or find her.
1. Millard residence
2. Hotel
3. storage unit
4. work van
5. red truck
6. ? another family vehicle
7. cell phone
8. cell phone
9. cell phone
10. pond search
11. franklin residence search
12. computer
13. texty kid's house
14. work records - time card etc.
15. camera and/or go pro??
These are just my guesses/possibilities. Another possibility would be alleged-supposed gas station video/surveillance.
I am playing catch up after work today...wanted to weigh in here.
If you know your heart is telling you to go to show respect for AJ, then by all means, please go and represent those of us who aren't local who have grown to love her. The only way it would be disrespectful is to go simply to be nosy...and I know from your posts here that is NOT your reason.
Does that include compromising the case by planting evidence? How about shifting LE's focus away from other possible suspects and onto yourself?
IF WH is innocent (big if IMO) then you have to wonder how much quicker LE could have done their jobs without him in the picture.
Or in other words, with dads like that who needs enemies?
He isnt a hero, not by a long shot.
I believe the decision to allow us to sleuth/discuss WH was based on the fact that he's been named as a suspect in previous LE investigations, with a violent, criminal history. I don't want to speak for anyone in an official capacity here at WS but in all the cases I've ever followed this is a very odd circumstance where he's considered both victim (parent of missing person) and previously convicted suspect in a case that has been discussed on this site.
I appreciate the TOS here and the tough decisions the mods have to make, especially in super-weird cases like this one.
I've been playing catch up. I've been wrong before and I'll be wrong again. WH very well might be responsible for AJ's death.
But, there are things that just don't sit right with me. Things that give me pause.
WH hasn't been named a suspect by LE. His charges so far stem from breaking into a house he believed AJ was seen, JMO but that is excusable behavior for a dad. Right? No. But when you are desperately looking for your child, you just might be willing to do anything to save your child's life or find her.
Here is the newscast about the search warrants
Update. Try this link https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DmGbcaiyIGU
Apples and oranges. If you have a problem, take it up with a mod or admin in a pm.I've been following from the beginning as well. My decision to begin posting comes partly from my confusion about WH not actually being named a suspect, yet being discussed here as though he has. On another recent thread, just an inkling that you might even be dreaming at night that 'mom and dad' had anything to do with it, would bring down the house of "No, No, you can'ts! on you. Since I have been following and reading from the beginning anyway, posting allows me to find my place a lot easier. No big conspiracy here.![]()
She says that AJ's body will be laid to rest on Saturday. To me that means the ME will release it prior to Saturday, unless this is bad reporting. Thoughts?
I don't know, Zapped...but I'd come bail you out.![]()
I understand why some would think that way. I try VERY hard to give the benefit of the doubt but sometimes there's just so much OTHER stuff that makes it so hard. I know WH hasn't been named as a suspect yet, and that's always in the back of my thoughts.
There has only EVER been one other case that I followed that I was 100% certain of the guilty party until it was disclosed to me a close, dear friend actually knew the accused (and actually had the accused living with them for a time while they avoided media) and shared with me inside information in strict confidence, that blew my thought process completely out of the water. And when I say completely, I do mean completely. And all of it was documented but kept from the public. UGH! So often what the media shares and what LE doesn't share has a HUGE influence in what the public decides, whether it's legit or not.
So, it's for that reason I always appreciate fresh eyes even if I don't agree with them at first (or, ever, in some cases).
I've been playing catch up and working backwards. There have been many times I wanted to comment but the thread had been long closed. Lol
Recently, what I've done, is view the videos of a few people that have not been mentioned on here, yet have been interviewed. It has been enlightening to say the least. We all have analyzed the WH interview, and some of JH, as well. But I am now analyzing EVERYONE that has spoken on the news. Like I said, it's been enlightening.
On search warrants dont they have to list what they are looking for, for ea search warrant? IIRC, if they see something in open that pertains that's diff.