Breach_and_Clear
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 26
Hey everyone, I'm gonna give this a shot and add some information that would hopefully make sense.
I took interest in this case because the area bordering WV/VA is my go-to camping and hiking place. I've seen some strange things and people in the outdoors so I am always keeping my eyes peeled for suspicious activity when out and about.
Motive has to remain grounded in reality. I've seen hypothesized scenarios that are plausible, but highly unlikely. First being the witness to a drug deal or random crime. If the victims pulled into the lot, they would not have surprised any criminals caught in the act. Their headlights would've given them away hundreds of yards before entering the parking area. Any criminals in the process of a drug deal or other crime, would've packed up and hidden their contraband in case the headlights were a LEO. It is also a really dumb area to meet for a drug deal or something. No escape routes, open air for surveillance, etc etc. This is also just an educated opinion but I'm just trying to use experience and insider knowledge to assist. The weapon being uncommon for most criminals also leads a reasonable person to look elsewhere.
Another unlikely motive would be that they were ambushed by a jealous lover or acquaintance. Regardless of how innocent they appeared on the surface, nobody ever truly knows what went on in their lives. However, that would be the first place detectives would start following this crime. They start with the victims and work outward. Every single one of their friends would've been intereviewed and re-interviewed. Cell phone records, emails, house searches, vehicle searches, criminal records, potential polygraph statements, teacher interviews, job interviews etc etc etc. Every single aspect to develop a suspect would've been covered. And if a person of interest was identified then the DNA sample could've been used to corroborate. So it is highly unlikely that the victims knew the killer. That doesn't mean that the killer didnt know the victims, but they could've known of them without ever meeting them. I would assume its safe to say after so many years that any friends, family, or acquaintance leads have been pursued ad nauseum.
The most likely situations would be either a serial/thrill kill type murder with or without sexual motivations since that info has never been released to the public. Or a drunken rage filled homicide that stemmed from something random like road rage, a look in the wrong direction, or just a drunken fool. The problem being that the location is remote and it wouldn't be a good place to stalk for victims. There is a possibility that the killer followed them there, or stumbled upon them while out hunting for a victim. Maybe they stopped at store and someone saw them, maybe they pulled up next to someone in traffic and the killer thought they looked like good victims. This is also the same way they couldve interacted with a drunken road rage type killer. The police wouldve obviously looked at all angles of this as well. Checking passive traffic cameras at redlights. Retracing the steps of the victims and pulling surveillance from any store they went to. Etc. Which also means its highly unlikely they developed any suspects or POI based upon those methods. Any POI info wouldve been released to the public for help in identifying. Which means that it is likely that the killer was in the mountains or rural areas already and outside the view of the general public. Local LE wouldve interviewed any transients or people with possible MO crimes in the area. All LE already knows who the problem people are in their neighborhood. Whos the town drunk, which kid shot holes in a street sign, who beats his wife etc. So anyone remotely capable of this crime wouldve been intereviewed or at least crossed of a list of potential suspects. Also meaning that maybe the killer isn't from this area at all to begin with. Which is why LE has been having an issue. Also any potential serial cases wouldve been checked and rechecked. James Matthew, CPK, Charles Severance etc etc.
Important information that would help but hasn't been released is what would keep us all from hypothesizing and letting our imagination run wild. Crime scene photos and detailed information is what would present LE with a direction to go in. For instance; were they ambushed or stalked? Had they set up camp yet or shot immediately upon arriving? How close were the shell casings?
Think about it. If the killer was waiting in concealment and took sniper shots at the victims, he would need perfect conditions. He would have to be in a concealment location and know ahead of time how David was going to park the car. To shoot through the window and hit David would mean he was on the drivers side or the front of the vehicle. If Heidi got out of the car and took of running, the killer would need a clean line of sight to his target. If he was at a distance, hitting a moving target at about 8 fps or 5mph is pretty difficult even for a trained individual. Add the fact that the headlights from the vehicle would be blinding the shooter if he was shooting from the front. And if he was shooting from the side, he wouldn't have a clear line of sight for Heidi as she ran or was out of the car doing whatever.
So that would lead a reasonable person to surmise that the killer shot the victims from a personal distance. Probably walked up on the vehicle and shot through the glass, then was close enough to shoot Heidi as she was out of the car. Regardless of lighting conditions thats pretty easy for someone with a rifle.
Leaving us with the question as to whether the shooter was hiding and approached the vehicle or if he pulled up in a vehicle and got close to the targets that way. Using his headlights to blind the victims and assist with his target acquisition.
Lots more questions than answers and I'm not trying to point the investigation in one direction or another. Just offering some first hand knowledge that might show why LE is stumped and where we can start looking for similarities.
I took interest in this case because the area bordering WV/VA is my go-to camping and hiking place. I've seen some strange things and people in the outdoors so I am always keeping my eyes peeled for suspicious activity when out and about.
Motive has to remain grounded in reality. I've seen hypothesized scenarios that are plausible, but highly unlikely. First being the witness to a drug deal or random crime. If the victims pulled into the lot, they would not have surprised any criminals caught in the act. Their headlights would've given them away hundreds of yards before entering the parking area. Any criminals in the process of a drug deal or other crime, would've packed up and hidden their contraband in case the headlights were a LEO. It is also a really dumb area to meet for a drug deal or something. No escape routes, open air for surveillance, etc etc. This is also just an educated opinion but I'm just trying to use experience and insider knowledge to assist. The weapon being uncommon for most criminals also leads a reasonable person to look elsewhere.
Another unlikely motive would be that they were ambushed by a jealous lover or acquaintance. Regardless of how innocent they appeared on the surface, nobody ever truly knows what went on in their lives. However, that would be the first place detectives would start following this crime. They start with the victims and work outward. Every single one of their friends would've been intereviewed and re-interviewed. Cell phone records, emails, house searches, vehicle searches, criminal records, potential polygraph statements, teacher interviews, job interviews etc etc etc. Every single aspect to develop a suspect would've been covered. And if a person of interest was identified then the DNA sample could've been used to corroborate. So it is highly unlikely that the victims knew the killer. That doesn't mean that the killer didnt know the victims, but they could've known of them without ever meeting them. I would assume its safe to say after so many years that any friends, family, or acquaintance leads have been pursued ad nauseum.
The most likely situations would be either a serial/thrill kill type murder with or without sexual motivations since that info has never been released to the public. Or a drunken rage filled homicide that stemmed from something random like road rage, a look in the wrong direction, or just a drunken fool. The problem being that the location is remote and it wouldn't be a good place to stalk for victims. There is a possibility that the killer followed them there, or stumbled upon them while out hunting for a victim. Maybe they stopped at store and someone saw them, maybe they pulled up next to someone in traffic and the killer thought they looked like good victims. This is also the same way they couldve interacted with a drunken road rage type killer. The police wouldve obviously looked at all angles of this as well. Checking passive traffic cameras at redlights. Retracing the steps of the victims and pulling surveillance from any store they went to. Etc. Which also means its highly unlikely they developed any suspects or POI based upon those methods. Any POI info wouldve been released to the public for help in identifying. Which means that it is likely that the killer was in the mountains or rural areas already and outside the view of the general public. Local LE wouldve interviewed any transients or people with possible MO crimes in the area. All LE already knows who the problem people are in their neighborhood. Whos the town drunk, which kid shot holes in a street sign, who beats his wife etc. So anyone remotely capable of this crime wouldve been intereviewed or at least crossed of a list of potential suspects. Also meaning that maybe the killer isn't from this area at all to begin with. Which is why LE has been having an issue. Also any potential serial cases wouldve been checked and rechecked. James Matthew, CPK, Charles Severance etc etc.
Important information that would help but hasn't been released is what would keep us all from hypothesizing and letting our imagination run wild. Crime scene photos and detailed information is what would present LE with a direction to go in. For instance; were they ambushed or stalked? Had they set up camp yet or shot immediately upon arriving? How close were the shell casings?
Think about it. If the killer was waiting in concealment and took sniper shots at the victims, he would need perfect conditions. He would have to be in a concealment location and know ahead of time how David was going to park the car. To shoot through the window and hit David would mean he was on the drivers side or the front of the vehicle. If Heidi got out of the car and took of running, the killer would need a clean line of sight to his target. If he was at a distance, hitting a moving target at about 8 fps or 5mph is pretty difficult even for a trained individual. Add the fact that the headlights from the vehicle would be blinding the shooter if he was shooting from the front. And if he was shooting from the side, he wouldn't have a clear line of sight for Heidi as she ran or was out of the car doing whatever.
So that would lead a reasonable person to surmise that the killer shot the victims from a personal distance. Probably walked up on the vehicle and shot through the glass, then was close enough to shoot Heidi as she was out of the car. Regardless of lighting conditions thats pretty easy for someone with a rifle.
Leaving us with the question as to whether the shooter was hiding and approached the vehicle or if he pulled up in a vehicle and got close to the targets that way. Using his headlights to blind the victims and assist with his target acquisition.
Lots more questions than answers and I'm not trying to point the investigation in one direction or another. Just offering some first hand knowledge that might show why LE is stumped and where we can start looking for similarities.