Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is a BOLO ?
Best I can do is an incomplete link from google search. When you go to link there is nothing about the landlady in the story/report. https://www.google.com/search?q=WTP...icial&channel=sb&q=WToP+Jesse+Mathew+landlord
Jesse Matthew is believed to be the last person to see Hannah Graham, an .... Landlord says Jesse was very friendly Thursday night. Offered to ...
But, I bet she knows if he cut off those dreads cuz she saw him on Thursday.
If he is more afraid of what others might do to him on the outside.Ok, let me correct my above comment.
But JM preferred to drive in a reckless manner, or some other driving violation refusing to pull over and causing a car chase . That is not quite laying low. He gave them a reason to arrest him, all because of that. What the heck was he thinking to commit a driving violation (driving recklessly or speeding and then refusing to pull over) when he had just been told to lay low?
Bottom line - He knows he is being watched, why would he do anything that would cause him to get pulled over or to make the situation worse by running from the cops. Not a smart move at all.
Yes, I was going to say this. They would have no grounds to obtain his DNA with no evidence of DNA from somewhere else like Hannah's body (sorry). I'm not a lawyer, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
Yeah. It really alarms me that not one, but two different men in the span of minutes were tracking and tailing this young woman. I know WG came forward and is unlikely to have been involved but also I don;t believe he was "concerned for her safety". Ick.
Surveillance devices? Would this be legal if they were installed on the 1st house search without the knowledge of JM? Not saying this is what happened, but could it be a possibility?
And (my ignorance here) can dreds be removed and then put back in quickly? As in used to change an appearance?
Best I can do is an incomplete link from google search. When you go to link there is nothing about the landlady in the story/report. https://www.google.com/search?q=WTP...icial&channel=sb&q=WToP+Jesse+Mathew+landlord
Jesse Matthew is believed to be the last person to see Hannah Graham, an .... Landlord says Jesse was very friendly Thursday night. Offered to ...
But, I bet she knows if he cut off those dreads cuz she saw him on Thursday.
BBM: Another poster comfirmed in a prior comment that dreds can be removed and put back in (as in , not all dreds are "homegrown"). So perhaps his are removable and did not need to be cut, just removed, if changing appearances was the goal. Not suggesting this happened, but I wanted to understand how easily someone could have dreds one day and short hair the next and evidently, it's easy.
I know folks in this thread have this POI convicted for every crime that ever happened remotely in this vicinity. But I haven't seen the police actually mention anything to suggest that this guy actually killed this victim. The minute the police found even a drop of evidence implicating him, they would immediately issue a warrant for his arrest. The fact that they apparently found no obvious clues, not a single hair, blood drop, etc. during the first search and have to re-search, and still no arrest warrant for murder, makes me doubt there is any viable claim against this guy.
I also worry that if the pd is barking up the wrong tree, that someone who truly may have been involved in her disappearance may have gotten away with destroying evidence etc. The reason I am skeptical is because this case strongly reminds me of a death penalty case I briefly worked on where the conviction was overturned with dna evidence. I won't get into those details but the cops were essentially lazy and rather than do an involved investigation and follow all leads, they picked the easiest guy to pin a case on.
I know folks in this thread have this POI convicted for every crime that ever happened remotely in this vicinity. But I haven't seen the police actually mention anything to suggest that this guy actually killed this victim. The minute the police found even a drop of evidence implicating him, they would immediately issue a warrant for his arrest. The fact that they apparently found no obvious clues, not a single hair, blood drop, etc. during the first search and have to re-search, and still no arrest warrant for murder, makes me doubt there is any viable claim against this guy.
I also worry that if the pd is barking up the wrong tree, that someone who truly may have been involved in her disappearance may have gotten away with destroying evidence etc. The reason I am skeptical is because this case strongly reminds me of a death penalty case I briefly worked on where the conviction was overturned with dna evidence. I won't get into those details but the cops were essentially lazy and rather than do an involved investigation and follow all leads, they picked the easiest guy to pin a case on.
Does MH have a thread here? Like, did WS follow her disappearance?
FORMS OF VIRGINIA RECKLESS DRIVING
(1) The most common form of reckless driving is speeding 20+ over the speed limit; 46.2-862. A person shall be guilty of reckless driving who drives a motor vehicle on the highways in the Commonwealth (i) at a speed of twenty miles per hour or more in excess of the applicable maximum speed limit or (ii) in excess of eighty miles per hour regardless of the applicable maximum speed limit.(2) Driving in a manner generally endangering others; 46.2-852. Reckless driving; general rule - Irrespective of the maximum speeds permitted by law, any person who drives a vehicle on any highway recklessly or at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person shall be guilty of reckless driving.
http://www.vatrafficlaw.com/reckless.html
The media statements by LE indicated to me that LM was charged with the second form, not the first.