GhostGhost
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2010
- Messages
- 642
- Reaction score
- 1,934
'
POI JM sped off because he didn't want to found.
We got us a runner.
.
POI JM sped off because he didn't want to found.
We got us a runner.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it shows he is very responsible in caring and providing for his dog popcorn when he realised he needed to get away for a time.:fence:It's definitely shady that JM's dog popcorn wasn't at his apartment when they did a second search. Especially considering the landlord said she'd watch the dog sometimes. So where's the dog? Where's JM? He's hiding out with popcorn somewhere. I think he knew he was gonna bolt. They need to watch his family. Seems that might be the way to find him.
the perp admitted it:happydance:Behind... but I believe this was speculation on this board.
Sent from my KFOT using Tapatalk
It was said by me. Right here on Websleuths.
Don't worry, your biggest mistake is being a Newcastle supporter. Just kidding of course
Again, LE isn't going to be so adamant and brazen about his involvement if they didn't have evidence to support their suspicion. The DA would NOT let that happen if it wasn't pretty clear who committed this crime. JMO.
Or she knew him from before, recognized him and called his name so he turned around and said "oh hey Hannah" and put his arm around her waist. Also plausible. Too bad surveillance video doesn't have sound.
6. I don't know the difference between covert and overt
7. JM's dog's name is Popcorn
6. I don't know the difference between covert and overt
7. JM's dog's name is Popcorn
But why would LE expect JM to give them the evidence to charge him??
Major speculation here but I am wondering if there is any significance to the fact that forensics aren't in yet. I am a scientist who does DNA analysis but certainly not in criminal cases. As someone pointed out earlier, DNA analyses can sometimes be completed quite speedily, depending on sample conditions and of course lab priority. Let's say that 40 items of evidence were taken from JM's car and residence. DNA comparisons are being run , run, and run, and so far, there are no matches to HG. I can't help but think if there *had* been a hit, it would be known by now; whereas no hit means re-sampling, re-amplifying, and re-running the comparison. 100% deep-fried speculation, but still.
Really...Don't worry, your biggest mistake is being a Newcastle supporter. Just kidding of course
But if we're all supposed to operate under the assumption that the dude is innocent until proven guilty, why WOULD'NT he help the police advance the case. So many here think this guy is innocent for whatever reason: he doesn't look creepy, he's a good Christian guy, he has a job, he said he left Hannah after Tempo, he coaches youth sports and some people think he's great are some of the reasons I've seen cited here. But it seems like the same people who are saying he is likely innocent are saying, "why should he sit down and help the police charge him. Why would he say anything!"
SO my question is this: is he an innocent good Christian youth sports coach with a job and doesn't happen to look creepy, or is he someone who shouldn't help the police charge him? It can't be both ways, so posters saying both things really confuses me. If he is truly innocent, why WOULDN'T he provide the police with his knowledge of that night? Not only could it help save Hannah's life if she is still alive, but it could also clear his name if he did not do anything to her. The information he provides could lead him to the real perp so why isn't he giving up the info?
How do you know the dog's name? Are we allowed to sleuth pets?
I've read some posts theorizing sex trafficking. What evidence leads to this conclusion?
I don't think it means anything necessarily. I am sure they are doing way more than just DNA analysis and often they can't all be done at the same time and there is an order because one test can ruin it for another. Sure, if you are just matching prints, you may get results fast, or just DNA. But, if you are checking for useable prints, trace, hair and fiber, DNA, fluids, etc, then it takes many people and many tests that cannot all be done at the same time. And they prefer to get all results back before acting on them.Major speculation here but I am wondering if there is any significance to the fact that forensics aren't in yet. I am a scientist who does DNA analysis but certainly not in criminal cases. As someone pointed out earlier, DNA analyses can sometimes be completed quite speedily, depending on sample conditions and of course lab priority. Let's say that 40 items of evidence were taken from JM's car and residence. DNA comparisons are being run , run, and run, and so far, there are no matches to HG. I can't help but think if there *had* been a hit, it would be known by now; whereas no hit means re-sampling, re-amplifying, and re-running the comparison. 100% deep-fried speculation, but still.
So many here think this guy is innocent for whatever reason: he doesn't look creepy, he's a good Christian guy, he has a job, he said he left Hannah after Tempo, he coaches youth sports and some people think he's great are some of the reasons I've seen cited here.
'
POI JM sped off because he didn't want to found.
We got us a runner.
.
But if we're all supposed to operate under the assumption that the dude is innocent until proven guilty, why WOULD'NT he help the police advance the case. So many here think this guy is innocent for whatever reason: he doesn't look creepy, he's a good Christian guy, he has a job, he said he left Hannah after Tempo, he coaches youth sports and some people think he's great are some of the reasons I've seen cited here. But it seems like the same people who are saying he is likely innocent are saying, "why should he sit down and help the police charge him. Why would he say anything!"
SO my question is this: is he an innocent good Christian youth sports coach with a job and doesn't happen to look creepy, or is he someone who shouldn't help the police charge him? It can't be both ways, so posters saying both things really confuses me. If he is truly innocent, why WOULDN'T he provide the police with his knowledge of that night? Not only could it help save Hannah's life if she is still alive, but it could also clear his name if he did not do anything to her. The information he provides could lead him to the real perp so why isn't he giving up the info?
But if we're all supposed to operate under the assumption that the dude is innocent until proven guilty, why WOULD'NT he help the police advance the case. So many here think this guy is innocent for whatever reason: he doesn't look creepy, he's a good Christian guy, he has a job, he said he left Hannah after Tempo, he coaches youth sports and some people think he's great are some of the reasons I've seen cited here. But it seems like the same people who are saying he is likely innocent are saying, "why should he sit down and help the police charge him. Why would he say anything!"
SO my question is this: is he an innocent good Christian youth sports coach with a job and doesn't happen to look creepy, or is he someone who shouldn't help the police charge him? It can't be both ways, so posters saying both things really confuses me. If he is truly innocent, why WOULDN'T he provide the police with his knowledge of that night? Not only could it help save Hannah's life if she is still alive, but it could also clear his name if he did not do anything to her. The information he provides could lead him to the real perp so why isn't he giving up the info?