I'm sure the police could locate all sorts of information, even DNA for the dog if they had a body to analyse, but they don't. Instead, there is a very dangerous 32 year old man in custody, a dog that is not lost, found, or missing, and everything is okay on the Jesse Matthew front. His father is still a felon, as is Jesse. He was apparently raised by his grandmother (who lives East of Charlottesville - where the reckless driving charge originated) and although mom was in the fleeing, reckless driving car, she is okay. I believe that she was an absent mother and that Jesse started hating women when he met his mother.
I like this info. One question...what about if they just had the dog? Could they see if HG blood was on the dog? I am assuming the dog was at the apt the whole time and JM and HG were off on an isolated country road. I am assuming JM came home, touched the dog and transferred small drops of HG blood to the dog. So, even without HG body, can't they do DNA on blood found on the dog? Then can't they get some kind of DNA from HG toothbrush, hairbrush, tampon left in the trashcan, etc? (too much info...sorry about that)