Macpad
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
If that's the case in any way, you'd think that LINKING Hannah and the assaults, at least, would actually HELP, no?
I mean, if that's the case, that means ONE perp and not two or even three separate ones involved in events that all apparently transpired in a matter of hours.
Frankly it'd seem like if they thought at all that either or both were related to Hannah that they'd say it immediately (as in saying more than just looking into if they could be related) to alleviate some concern.
Heck, even if they aren't sure either way, wouldn't they also possibly gain more saying they believe they are but are still investigating? :waitasec: You'd think if anything that'd make another perp/perps let down their guard thinking LE was off track and focused on the POI from Hannah's case and not them.
But ignoring that last scenario, if pressure were to be involved, certainly it would be better PR to have 1 not 2-3 perps on the loose from one night's notable incidents, wouldn't it?
That makes me think they know they aren't related or they'd wrap it up with a neat tidy bow and at least decrease the concern about multiple perps from just the incidents that one night.
Didn't respond to the BEATING reference I posted I noticed. Hmmmmmmm