That was my understanding also.No. He put a motion before the court that we don't know about and the judge said she isn't ignoring him, but she's either denying it or putting it off because the jury is already deliberating.
They may be thinking the title didn’t implicate Johnny or that she was a victim specifically but rather generally she spoke out against violence- if they can’t take it as a whole? Which they may believe makes it a true statement taken alone?
I hope not
Well to each their own...that looks hot...hot...hot and not a pool in sight. In those photos she looks just like her sister. Somehow I don't think she will be spending much time out in the desert.Inside Amber Heard’s ‘sanctuary’ home in the desert as brutal trial nears end
After weeks of being the butt of social media jokes, smear campaigns and death threats, the actress now appears set to seek solace in her home near Joshua Tree in California valued at $1 million.nypost.com
now appears set to seek solace in a home valued at $1 million in California’s Yucca Valley, near Joshua Tree National Park.
Heard, 36, purchased the three-bedroom, three-bathroom desert oasis in 2019 for only $570,000 at the time under a private trust in the name of her accountant, according to property records seen by The Post.
But it appears she didn’t actually move into the home, which was built in 2015, until earlier this year, Dirt reported.
The home spans over 2,400 square feet and the property stretches over nearly six acres of desert land.
JURY QUESTION - Basically the jury is asking do they consider just the op-ed headline: " I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change." OR what's in the body of the op-ed. SEE Page 1 of verdict form in attached pic.
View attachment 347152
Inside Amber Heard’s ‘sanctuary’ home in the desert as brutal trial nears end
After weeks of being the butt of social media jokes, smear campaigns and death threats, the actress now appears set to seek solace in her home near Joshua Tree in California valued at $1 million.nypost.com
now appears set to seek solace in a home valued at $1 million in California’s Yucca Valley, near Joshua Tree National Park.
Heard, 36, purchased the three-bedroom, three-bathroom desert oasis in 2019 for only $570,000 at the time under a private trust in the name of her accountant, according to property records seen by The Post.
But it appears she didn’t actually move into the home, which was built in 2015, until earlier this year, Dirt reported.
The home spans over 2,400 square feet and the property stretches over nearly six acres of desert land.
Malice is defined in the jury instructions as lying and knowing you are lying OR being so reckless, you don't care if you're lying.It’s on record that is it is about JD, so there shouldn’t be any confusion on the A questions.
Question B gets a little tricky. What would define ‘actual malice’? That can be subjective? I would say yes because her actions prove she was out to hurt him.
Well to each their own...that looks hot...hot...hot and not a pool in sight. In those photos she looks just like her sister. Somehow I don't think she will be spending much time out in the desert.
Malice is defined in the jury instructions as lying and knowing you are lying OR being so reckless, you don't care if you're lying.
I think it's both on her part. She knows she's lying. When did she ever "speak out" against "sexual violence" and "face wrath" for it? What proof did she have that this happened? What proof does she have that she spoke out against domestic abuse and it happened?
What happened was -- she accused JD of hitting her in the face with a phone. She accused JD via People magazine of yanking all her hair out and headbutting her. Did she face the public's wrath when she did that? NO! He did.