VERY.
FF clearly says: that in order to determine if any of the statements in the op-ed are false, you must take the statements in the context of the op-ed as a whole.
So what is the op-ed, versus the op-ed as a whole? And what difference does that make if the statement IN QUESTION is the title? You must still consider it in the context of the op-ed as a whole, do you not?
How can the title NOT be part of the op-ed as a whole? What layperson reading it would EVER think it was not part of the op-ed?
In fact, what layperson would even read it if it wasn't announcing by implication that JD committed sexual violence on AH? I wouldn't bother reading further.