shotgun09
'Certified' Boomer
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Messages
- 4,276
- Reaction score
- 44,693
I wonder if reporters are going to reach out to the people who AH scammed about the donations
LOL! Reporters? For whom?
MSM wants to hide this, IMO
I wonder if reporters are going to reach out to the people who AH scammed about the donations
This isn't just about a broken pledge to donate millions from her divorce settlement. AH has gone on public record that she donated that money. PAST TENSE. She lied on Dutch TV about it (when she was going to the One Young World convention at The Hague as an 'ambassador'. She said she 'wanted nothing' from JD and the divorce. Another lie.
Source: One Young World, the Hague 2018
The whole snippet is interesting, as she also claims she and her family is still in constant danger from Johnny in the clip!!! but if you only want to skip ahead to the donation discussion it's at approx 1 minute 40 secs. She very clearly claims that she has donated the full 7 million dollars to the two charities. She is lying.
Now we have testimony under oath that she actually demanded $14,000,000 tax free from JD. And got others (JD and EM) to pay on her behalf only a very small portion of what she has been claiming credit for. It apparently even had an impact on the judge's decision in the UK trial.
Source from the UK ruling:
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Judgment-FINAL.pdf
Judge Nicol "A recurring theme in Mr Depp's evidence was that Ms Heard had constructed a hoax and that she had done this as an 'insurance policy' – presumably in the event that the marriage broke down [....] I recognise that there were other elements to the divorce settlement as well, but her donation of the $ 7 million to charity is hardly the act one would expect of a gold-digger." (Snipped by me)
It speaks to her dishonesty and constant fabrication.
JD is the one who initially wrote $100,000 checks to the child's hospital and ACLU on her behalf. And she got mad about that because she wanted it to go straight to her. Now, why is that?
LOL! Reporters? For whom?
MSM wants to hide this, IMO
Just an fyi if this goes on that long…
Judge Penny Azcarate has a prescheduled conference to attend from May 9-12, so the trial will pause over that week.
Amber Heard To Testify As 1st Defense Witness Next Week In Depp Trial – Deadline
No the plaintiff (Depp) did not rest yesterday, they I believe are expected to on Monday. Could have one or two more witnesses…don’t know. It is expected that Heard will be the first to testify when they do.Did the prosecution rest yesterday? or is there still more testimony from them? I missed almost the entire day yesterday still trying to catch up!
If SM is an indication and you haven’t been following Twitter, etc. (btw I have), read on…
Top Johnny Depp, Amber Heard trial tweets all lean one way
You have to be wondering if Heard has been keeping an eye on this…if not her, her friend no longer allowed in the courtroom surely is.
No the plaintiff (Depp) did not rest yesterday, they I believe are expected to on Monday. Could have one or two more witnesses…don’t know. It is expected that Heard will be the first to testify when they do.
We are all used to criminal trials when there is a prosecution and defense. This is a civil trial…plaintiff and defendant. So easy to get confused.Thank you! and thank you for the correction .. I definitely wasn't thinking before I posted! haha
If SM is an indication and you haven’t been following Twitter, etc. (btw I have), read on…
Top Johnny Depp, Amber Heard trial tweets all lean one way
You have to be wondering if Heard has been keeping an eye on this…if not her, her friend no longer allowed in the courtroom surely is.
This most glowing AH article published by The Hollywood Reporter in December 2018 is sickening, but particularly notable is the snippet below. Makes me wonder how much the ACLU pays employees and how much donation money is actually spent helping and protecting ALL victims of violence.
“I don’t think anyone would have looked differently at her if she kept the settlement money that was due to her, but she knew that money could do more for others than it could for her,” says Jessica Herman Weitz, director of artist engagement at the ACLU. “What that money was able to do to help protect women and other gender-based violence victims will go a long way to make a difference for the people that we serve. That was my first interaction with her, which is pretty bold. It was not, ‘I’ll throw you a tweet.’ It was, ‘I’m putting my money where my mouth is.'”
ETA link
Amber Heard on ‘Aquaman,’ Elon Musk, Dedication to Activism – The Hollywood Reporter
Did the prosecution rest yesterday? or is there still more testimony from them? I missed almost the entire day yesterday still trying to catch up!
So, in the Weitz statement above she says without knowing she said it...since Johnny Depp not Ms Heard paid the money! Ms. Weitz quote:I just wanted to observe in passing, that Ms. Weitz was one of those people specifically referenced in the testimony of ACLU counsel yesterday.
You are strong, haha. I gave up on that one at the 35 minute mark… thought that if I continued I might lose the will to live, lol.
Forgot to add .. fast forward to the 2 hour mark holy cow
I couldn't BELIEVE no one objected to that statement!
Yes, I was perplexed JD team did not object. AH defense team is beyond unprofessional, at this point; desperate. They are grasping at straws because they know their client is toast. AH's credibility nonexistent at this point. JMO
True! I should have used the eyeroll emoji with my post.
I just saw there is a Change.org petition to get AH removed from Aquaman 2. I haven't read every post here, so maybe it's already been mentioned. I just saw it for the first time and it has 2.4 million signatures.
Has anyone read Dan Wootton's latest article (trash piece) in today's Daily Fail?
He talks about "Amber" as though she is his best friend!
DAN WOOTTON: Johnny Depp is not a victim of cancel culture | Daily Mail Online
I haven't read the entire article, but I have seen mentioned in there of Eve Barlow.....(the woman.... AH's friend... who got kicked out of court earlier during the trial). That was enough for me..
IMO, AH and company has had six years to continue their stories, slander and defamation of JD. The fact that he was finally able to have his day in court, and state his 'side of the story' , which gained a serious number of supporters.. is countered with these 'few' bogus articles -claiming her innocence. I call BS when I see it. Nice try Wooton. We know you are on team "Flying Monkeys".