I agree murderers don't have to have a motive but even in their sick mind they usually do.
I honestly think we are looking in to the face of pure evil when it comes to these two defendants. Many times those who are evil know how to mask what they are really like. They are good at tricking others into believing they are good and use that to their advantage.
Imo, the motive in this case is the sickest of all motives and that was they both wanted to murder someone they found who had no value (according to these two psychopaths ) in order to satisfy their own desires. I believe this murder was nothing but a thrill kill to satisfy their own sick fantasies. I believe both of them trolled the net looking for who they perceived as the perfect victim and Nicole was the vulnerable one they chose. Often psychopaths who resort to murder know how to lure a victim by saying all the right words to pull them in. Look at how many girls got into Ted Bundy's car willingly only to never be seen again.
Snipped by me for focus.
OceanBlueEyes, I so agree with you about their motivations.
I keep coming back, as do others here, to the case of Leopold & Lowe. If any of you here haven't read about them, take some time to do so as their crime was very similar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_and_Loeb
I have a strong sense of "othering" in relation to this crime and the motivation of DE and NK.
By othering, we mean any action by which an individual or group becomes mentally classified in somebodys mind as not one of us. Rather than always remembering that every person is a complex bundle of emotions, ideas, motivations, reflexes, priorities, and many other subtle aspects, its sometimes easier to dismiss them as being in some way less human, and less worthy of respect and dignity, than we are.
DE and NK came from exclusive backgrounds - privileged, upper middle class, high achieving, early schooling at expensive private Christian academies - that cultivated the belief that they're better than most other people, particularly those who are poorer and of lower socioeconomic status. Growing up in that kind of sheltered environment, particularly where conservative religious schooling is involved, kids are taught early on that they must separate themselves from others who are sinful, less worthy.
I wouldn't have believed it had I not seen it in some of the kids my own children grew up with. The transition from strict Christian schools to public schools is somewhat difficult, even when the public school kids are of the same socioeconomic background. One of my son's friends used to get in fights with the other kids when he came to play. Turns out, his parents and teachers had told him that public school kids were dangerous and violent and to be afraid that they would carry weapons and harm him. He had been told that most public school kids carry knives, etc. Ridiculous, especially as this is an upper middle class community, not a hotbed for criminal types. These kids eventually adapted to public school, but not until they rejected many of the social lessons they had been taught at that Christian school.
DE and NK, like Leopold and Loeb, grew up in a privileged environment where they were told they were extraordinary, "better" than most people and that they would grow up to be influential leaders in society. They likely were taught to identify strongly with other people like themselves and to reject others less worthy. At the extreme level, people who grow up in this environment believe they're above society's usual rules and norms. In people like DE and NK, this kind of warped thinking leads into the desire to commit crimes for the thrill of it, and also to validate their own belief that they were part of a superior group of people. It's said they enjoyed crime shows, so one of them probably developed the idea (again, like L & L) of committing the "perfect" murder. They chose someone who was an "other", someone they felt was beneath them, to victimize. Like the little fella who thought my son and his friends were all violent and carrying knives, DE & NK probably thought NL was one of those sinful, unChristian, low income girls who were sexually promiscuous and somehow deserved to be tricked and exploited.
If DE & NK are like L & L, one was the leader, the other a follower who had to be persuaded to participate in the worst parts of the crime. It will be up to LE to find out which one was the leader.