Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whatever he had behind his back (I see it too, looks like a blue, slim object of some sort) will for sure be seen on the camera above and behind *him.
Also, I see what appears to be lots, and lots of plastic "party cups."
I think the "party cups" are in a bin against the wall...?
Exactly. It reminds of Elizabeth Smart's testimony and how LE approached her in a library once, wondering if it was her. Her kidnapper wouldn't let her remove her face covering and told LE for religious reasons that LE could not see her face. She recounted how she was so angry at herself later for not stepping forward but was scared for her life b/c the woman was squeezing her knee under the table. My point is: an adult would have jumped up and stood behind LE, shouting 'they kidnapped me!' But a 12-yr-old still isn't sure of the consequences - would LE give her back to the kidnapper? would SHE get in trouble? (she thought that up until the end, btw) A 12-year-old preteen lacks the same reasoning skills of an older teen/adult.
ETA: This is OT (kind of), but I do think Elizabeth Smart's testimony is priceless, as someone who was abducted, raped, and held captive for several months. Her thoughts/actions give alot of insight into how a child thinks and how they survive such an ordeal. Their young minds just think differently, especially regarding who is control and the consequences - such as 'getting in trouble' with parents/LE.
I can't decide if that's something he is holding or if it is the legs of a stand or something up against the wall.
Wow, you are so correct. This picture is an optical illusion.
(ps- you got some great eyes on ya!!)
http://www.roanoke.com/news/breaking/wb/270028
"Easley, 32, was charged by Salem police with credit card fraud and larceny"
This to me would seem as though she was already deceased when he used th card. You can't charge someone with fraud and larceny if there's a possibility that TS gave him the card willingly. Sounds like LE believes he took the card after she was murdered.
Great point !
Is it possible that the relationship started between Brittany and Jeff and Tina had guilt feelings because of the death of her son, as in not feeling close enough to him to keep him from the dangers of things like the choking game, that she allowed the relationship between Brittany and Jeff to try and keep her daughter close to her and even invited Jeff into her home to be able to keep a close eye on their relationship and to, in a warped way, further her relationship with her daughter? At some point maybe it backfired and she realized how bad it was, but didn't know what to do to turn back the clock and right things.
Anyway, that was just a thought and MOO.
http://www.roanoke.com/news/breaking/wb/270028
"Easley, 32, was charged by Salem police with credit card fraud and larceny"
This to me would seem as though she was already deceased when he used th card. You can't charge someone with fraud and larceny if there's a possibility that TS gave him the card willingly. Sounds like LE believes he took the card after she was murdered.
Great point !
Isn't it still fraud if you use someone else's cc.....even if they know it. You would have to sign your own signature or the owners.....either one....wrong to do. ???
Is it possible that the relationship started between Brittany and Jeff and Tina had guilt feelings because of the death of her son, as in not feeling close enough to him to keep him from the dangers of things like the choking game, that she allowed the relationship between Brittany and Jeff to try and keep her daughter close to her and even invited Jeff into her home to be able to keep a close eye on their relationship and to, in a warped way, further her relationship with her daughter? At some point maybe it backfired and she realized how bad it was, but didn't know what to do to turn back the clock and right things.
Anyway, that was just a thought and MOO.