Oh, here are my thoughts re: Hagerman's testimony as we heard it today. My thoughts always seem to make sense to me but, yet, get disproved time and again by these people.
#1 I don't recall hearing about the "lies that were told" today!
I don't know why MH says that AM was given the backpack and never looked inside when AM says he packed the bag himself. Was it a case of broken telephone, a misunderstanding? MH says that he hadn't been in touch with DM for a while and had just learned at the park on the 11th that AM was living at DMs house. If this is true, could he just have assumed that AM was given the backpack, just as he was given the toolbox. Or was that a careful statement to make his story more plausible, i.e. they were both given items and were unaware of the contents. I think this is where the pact comes in to play. MH says the pact was to get rid of the items asap. They did that so why the controversy about he "lies that were told"? I think the pact goes one step further and did include ensuring MS got the items (whether MS asked for them or DM instructed them to do it, I don't know and it doesn't matter to me) and to protect themselves by saying they never opened the backpack or toolbox. I think the pact was required because MH wanted zip to do with any of this and AM had to convince him by way of a pact that all they were going to do is drop the stuff to MS and it would be over. I think AM wanted to help out more but they had a pact not to get involved. Yet, AM is then arrested for murder and MH is the one to call crime stoppers to give up MS, so more happened then what was included in the pact and, maybe, that's why they no longer talk.
If this was the pact (to say they were given items, were unaware of the contents and to get rid of them immediately), then MH stuck to it and never wavered even though, he lied about it. Its all part of covering their own behinds. AM was the one to break the pact. Just me thinking out loud. All MOO.