I will very respectfully disagree with you on your post. Here is why... Who did it is
FAR more important than why they did it. Although motive is great to have, legally it is not required to obtain a verdict (that is law, not just my opinion).
I also watched the entire trial and
all of the elements needed to prove 1st degree premeditated murder are there: That is all you need for a conviction.
1. Her DNA, palm print, hair and photos prove that SHE committed the crime.
2. Crime scene photos, victim photos, autopsy photos clearly show WHAT was done to the victim.
3. Cover-up was proven by clean up of the scene, clean up of herself, putting the dog behind a fence and locking the bedroom door, cleaning and repositioning of the corpse, deletion of the photos, towels and camera bleached in washing machine, fake phone call to Travis later that day, alibi of Ryan Burns, lied, lied, lied and acted (very successfully) like nothing was wrong to everybody she knew.
4. Premeditation elements proven by rental car 90 miles away, gas cans, hair color change, phone turned off entire time in AZ, license plate... She kept a meticulous track of everything she did everywhere EXCEPT AZ... That was deliberate, regardless of what the defense argues. BUT, even if you choose to consider all of those items as coincidence (which is an enormous mental feat)... then you need to consider this extremely important point:
Premeditation can happen in seconds. It does not require a plan. The act of her going from gun to knife is proof alone that she KNEW she would kill him. Again, Juan laid this out brilliantly in closing... everybody knows a slash to the neck will kill someone. She didn't stop there (or begin there). She stabbed him in the heart with a KNIFE. She shot him in the head with a GUN.
The few minutes it took to commit this crime and change weapons is PREMEDITATION. That has been proven.
The ONLY way you can legally not find her guilty of 1st degree premeditated murder with all of these factors shown and proven in court, is to believe her story that she "accidently" shot him with his gun that she thought was unloaded, that she obtained from his closet in the midst of a struggle that oh by the way was completely pristine after the crime, and that she blacked out and doesn't remember the stabbing or cleaning or driving or lying for hours after. It defies logic.
So with all due respect, no... motive doesn't matter here. (Although, I firmly believe it was laid out very well during the trial).
We all wish we had clear answers as to why people do what they do, because it's not comfortable to believe that such evil exists in this world. Sadly, it does and history has proven that.
Please don't get caught up in the "weeds" as they say. Focus on the facts of the case and a more clear picture will emerge for you.
Thanks for listening to my side of things