Mrs G Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 14,077
- Reaction score
- 6,178
I could do the math... I don't really want to.
What time is it in AUS? (now)
5:35pm
I could do the math... I don't really want to.
What time is it in AUS? (now)
I saw that whole show and did not realize that was Jill. WOW That was a great episode and a well done show. I was first convinced the guy was guilty until they showed more of the interrogation. It is so sad when LE bullies people into admitting guilt.
Not sure how the victim ended up with alleged wounds that looked like stab wounds but those type of police tactics are inexusable. What is really sad is the LE person still thinks he did nothing wrong. The person was obviously not mentally able to handle that and he obviously did not know he could ask for a lawyer it seems. He was bullied into it and it was sad.
Not that it matters much by now, but I am appalled by how Jodi and the defense team were allowed to get away with so much nonsense and unprofessionalism inside and outside of the courtroom.
-Weve seen outrageous gestures and actions in the courtroom (laughing, smirking, flipping birds, etc.).
-Weve had friends of DT witnesses laughing and cheering on their witness and even admitted to by the witness.
-Weve had tweets alleged from the defendent with put downs of the prosecuter
-Weve had the defendent working with someone to sell merchandise for profit and she is the one accused of the murder. It seems laws were written to try to prevent this sort of thing.
-Weve had lying on the stand and proven to be lies by both defendent and their witnesses
-Weve had purposeful delaying of the trial (years before it starts, mystery headaches, mystery schedule problems with witnesses, etc.)
-Weve had a ton of taxpayer money spent (milllions) and some would say a very poor job for all that money spent
The list goes on and on. All I can say is I am very disappointed there was not more control of the courtroom and the DT in this case. There was a total lack of control. And even in a DP case, there needs to be a certain level of control. This has been a circus IMO.
Depending on which part of Aus you are in though5:35pm
Juries are inherently unpredictable. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for Murder 1 but won't be surprised if we see a Murder 2 compromise verdict. I will be pretty surprised if the verdict is manslaughter, and I will be really surprised if she gets off scot free.
Depending on which part of Aus you are in though
TxProfessional and ScottishCarole: Here's the blue and elephant story
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=9051928&highlight=elephants#post9051928
hey now do not confuse me! lol
Australia has more time zones than I realized!
:
on the other hand, the CA verdict taught me that I shouldn't ASSUME all the jurors have common sense... Still haven't gotten over that verdict... :stormingmad:
I would love to see the known perjurers brought up on charges--won't name names, but we know who they are. Nurmi and Willmott have no control over their client inside or outside of the Courtroom. She's running a sideshow from her jail cell and is calling the shots in the case. Though I absolutely despise the defense strategy for this case, I hesitate to say that Nurmi and Willmott did a bad job defending her. They put on a rigorous (albeit chock full of lies because it's all "according to Jodi) defense and she was afforded every opportunity to present her case. What matter's most is what an appellate court would say after she's convicted. I don't want them to point to anything the DT did or didn't do and find that Jodi didn't get a fair shake. Even if they couldn't control Jodi's behavior in court, her attorneys should have been more cognizant of their own behavior, especially considering the gravity of the situation.Not that it matters much by now, but I am appalled by how Jodi and the defense team were allowed to get away with so much nonsense and unprofessionalism inside and outside of the courtroom.
-Weve seen outrageous gestures and actions in the courtroom (laughing, smirking, flipping birds, etc.).
-Weve had friends of DT witnesses laughing and cheering on their witness and even admitted to by the witness.
-Weve had tweets alleged from the defendent with put downs of the prosecuter
-Weve had the defendent working with someone to sell merchandise for profit and she is the one accused of the murder. It seems laws were written to try to prevent this sort of thing.
-Weve had lying on the stand and proven to be lies by both defendent and their witnesses
-Weve had purposeful delaying of the trial (years before it starts, mystery headaches, mystery schedule problems with witnesses, etc.)
-Weve had a ton of taxpayer money spent (milllions) and some would say a very poor job for all that money spent
The list goes on and on. All I can say is I am very disappointed there was not more control of the courtroom and the DT in this case. There was a total lack of control. And even in a DP case, there needs to be a certain level of control. This has been a circus IMO.
I agree with you. I was very disheartened to read the story about Travis's memorial with the headline "RIVERSIDE: Graveside vigil held for man killed by Jodi Arias" That was wrong. Travis is much more then the man killed by Jodi Arias and his name should be remembered long after she is locked up on death row. I hope after the verdict is read and the sentencing is handed down that there is no reason to ever hear that name again but I will think of Travis often and mourn what was lost and celebrate what was and know that he will live forever in the hearts of his family and those whose lives he touched.
I agree.......I have never quite got over that verdict either.
And I never knew about WS site then either.....I wish I had as most people I know never watched the trial like I did, so didn`t quite get it as much as people on here would have.
I would have had somewhere to vent......lol......other than my poor DH.
The CA verdict still stings, but I'm cautiously optimistic about this jury.I agree.......I have never quite got over that verdict either.
And I never knew about WS site then either.....I wish I had as most people I know never watched the trial like I did, so didn`t quite get it as much as people on here would have.
I would have had somewhere to vent......lol......other than my poor DH.
The stories Chris Hughes is recalling on Tricia's show are absolutely bone chilling! It's one thing when you hear them in court, relayed by someone else or read in an email but listening to someone who was there (Chris) & hearing what happened is really giving me chills!!
Just the one he told now about Jodi busting into Travis' GMail account; Jodi of course said they "shared" each others passwords, yet when Chris was going through Travis' email after his murder, there was one email that said "GET OUT OF MY EMAIL JODI, WE'LL TALK LATER", written by Travis. I've got the heebie jeebies! :scared::scared:
:Welcome1: :seeya: :Welcome1:
The stories Chris Hughes is recalling on Tricia's show are absolutely bone chilling! It's one thing when you hear them in court, relayed by someone else or read in an email but listening to someone who was there (Chris) & hearing what happened is really giving me chills!!
Just the one he told now about Jodi busting into Travis' GMail account; Jodi of course said they "shared" each others passwords, yet when Chris was going through Travis' email after his murder, there was one email that said "GET OUT OF MY EMAIL JODI, WE'LL TALK LATER", written by Travis. I've got the heebie jeebies! :scared::scared:
Apologies if this is a silly question and really obvious......but is there anywhere to listen to this outside of the US? I have seen it mentioned a couple of times and would love to listen to it if I can.
Aww Thank oooo :seeya:
Not that it matters much by now, but I am appalled by how Jodi and the defense team were allowed to get away with so much nonsense and unprofessionalism inside and outside of the courtroom.
-Weve seen outrageous gestures and actions in the courtroom (laughing, smirking, flipping birds, etc.).
-Weve had friends of DT witnesses laughing and cheering on their witness and even admitted to by the witness.
-Weve had tweets alleged from the defendent with put downs of the prosecuter
-Weve had the defendent working with someone to sell merchandise for profit and she is the one accused of the murder. It seems laws were written to try to prevent this sort of thing.
-Weve had lying on the stand and proven to be lies by both defendent and their witnesses
-Weve had purposeful delaying of the trial (years before it starts, mystery headaches, mystery schedule problems with witnesses, etc.)
-Weve had a ton of taxpayer money spent (milllions) and some would say a very poor job for all that money spent
The list goes on and on. All I can say is I am very disappointed there was not more control of the courtroom and the DT in this case. There was a total lack of control. And even in a DP case, there needs to be a certain level of control. This has been a circus IMO.