No disrespect intended but they removed her name from everything and started referring to her by initials so that indicates she was a victim of sex crimes and I'm sure pedophiles will use any term to explain away their action instead of just saying ' because i'm a sick *advertiser censored** , that's why '. I don't think teaching someone a lesson is molesting their child. I think that was just his justification and hopes that it would make him look like less of a sicko.
However, in this case, I would LOVE for the outcome to be that some one with a kind heart and good intentions and no ill will has taken her home and bathed her and fed her and doesn't know she's missing yet and just thought she needed a little attention in a grandmotherly way. Boy,,,,,, what a wonderful daydream
I've been around here for ages, I know why her name was removed. My point in including that her name was removed was it's hard to tell what all was happening with that case afterward.
And I'm absolutely NOT saying he had a reason for what he did. I'm giving what has been said in court about what his "purpose" was.
I would hope given how long I've been here, my posting history, heck I'm the one that chased down the other case you were asking about in this thread, that I'd not be accused of justifying something I came NOWHERE near saying, NOR treated like I have no idea why they're not using her name. :notgood:
I was explaining a bit of the story and giving ONLY a new article so that it did NOT have her name because most of what's out there DOES still have her name. It's the very few articles with the perp and his "reasons" that do not name her, but they don't include the back story for someone who hadn't followed it.
So I gave a brief few line summary of what happened and the article and explained why it's been hard to get information given things don't include her name, making it harder to follow up. :silenced:
My point was there are times people have done horrible things and done it because they took issue with the parents/a parent, as was what was stated by the perp in the CC case as what he did. And frankly prior to them arresting him, it was widely thought (and VERY believed and speculated here) that it had to do with drug ties.
I am IN NO WAY justifying it. I was using it as another case where a child who had been in a home, in a room with other kids, disappeared overnight, and no one seems to know why and there is no indication as to where she may be.
Thus questioning if there might be someone that took issue with her parent(s) - again, NOT justified regardless of the reason - and were trying to use J to drive some point home.
And again
none of what you're saying is anything I have ever mentioned, let alone thought - in this or any of the thousands of cases I've participated in, started threads on, or sleuthed on here.