erok
Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 0
I am sorry and will be much more careful to insure that links open properly
http://cameogarrett.blogspot.com/
I am sorry and will be much more careful to insure that links open properly
Hi all.
I'm not familiar w/ the case, but, did a quick read of the last 7 pages. Spent some time on the timeline post (much appreciated) and map.
Do we know what carrier Mackenzie's cell phone used?
My money is still on:
(1) WC as the murderess; and
(2) JF--and/or other unidentified male(s)--as accesssory(s) after-the-fact, i.e., clean up and disposal of body.
In my opinion, suspicions regarding JF are predicated almost entirely on JF's association with WC.
MC was very thin, though tall. With the errrr.... abbreviated clothing that teens favor, some of her clothes could very well look like a child's clothes through the window.
At any rate, everyone agrees that it wasn't unusual for her to have lots of clothes and shoes in her car.
My money is still on:
(1) WC as the murderess; and
(2) JF--and/or other unidentified male(s)--as accesssory(s) after-the-fact, i.e., clean up and disposal of body.
In my opinion, suspicions regarding JF are predicated almost entirely on JF's association with WC.
Is this JL? I tried to attach photo View attachment 8462
I wish JF had an advocate on here. Everyone else we've talked about seems to have one or more people telling us how great those people are.
I was able to verify some things yesterday from someone from a local LE agency. First, I would say that everyone's theory that LE is simply waiting for more evidence to charge their POI (and stick) seems correct. LE does not want to rush and charge someone (who may be already lawyered up) and have to share critical case info with them. This is nothing new and is exactly why many of your have theorized. What else...?
This is obviously not consistent with the gang theory introduced yesterday..
Hmmmmm..
I guess it is a waiting game...
WW has a new article, today. It says about the same thing as their last news article.
http://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/2010/apr/01/no-letting-up-in-cowell-case-police-pledge-still/
Law enforcement officers from the two cities and two counties make up most of the task force investigating Cowells death. Doug Jones, task force spokesman, said the task force is running at about nine workers per day, the same as shortly after Cowells body was found. An FBI agent also works part-time on the case, as do two officials from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Jones has said that ICEs assistance is not related to any suspected illegal immigrant connection to this case.
Jones was asked if any of the investigators are frustrated with the lack of an arrest. I dont hear or sense frustration from any of the investigators involved, he said. Most have the experience to know that investigations of this nature often take time but do eventually get solved. Determined and optimistic are more descriptive of our attitudes than frustration.
Yes it was just for restraining conversation (meaning a certain mother could not discuss certain issues with a certain daughter), so I don't understand why it had to be lifted either. Also, I find it very telling that in the 17 months MC and JV dated, JV never once met WC (as someone stated earlier) and was much closer to RC and his fiance. Can you imagine if you had a 17 year old daughter and you never met her boyfriend in a year and a half but lived in the same town and supposedly lived with her part time? That's hinky.
I was the one that stated that JV and WC never met. MC didn't want JV to meet her mother because she thought WC would be mean to him. WC didn't like the fact that her 17 year old daughter was dating a 21 year old guy. RC and his fiance had a very good relationship to JV. It is true that MC became extremely close to her dad's fiance, closer than she was to her own mother.