jenstar
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2012
- Messages
- 1,081
- Reaction score
- 122
If there have been so many errors, then and now with Amos, it's possible that we must question if her birth year listed is even correct. With the Mary Anderson case, I am, as of this week, to the point where I'm now venturing outside the the coroner's age range of 33-45 years of age. I think it's time we should start looking a little outside the box.
I have even recently shown Mary Anderson's sketch and death photos to females that I know. Most of them said she appears between 40-60 years in age, three of them said over sixty. You have to remember, this case investigation wasn't that thorough.
But doesn't the coroner estimate the possible age by the bone analysis? I just hope that the results of a possible age range was inputted correctly.
Yea, I would say that the aging in the photograph may also have something to do with the cyanide attacking soft tissues of the face. Maybe the only reason why the UID is estimated so much younger is because of the bone and organ analysis.