RabidBadger
Verified registered nurse
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 393
- Reaction score
- 11
another snip from the article I just posted
Can anyone map where this is?
Edit: Nevermind, I am stupid.
another snip from the article I just posted
http://redmond.patch.com/articles/update-search-for-missing-boy-moves-to-redmond-7a3868c0The search for a missing 2-year-old is now focused on an area surrounding the boy's mother's home in Redmond, The Seattle Times reported earlier today.
Jim Bove, a spokesman for the Redmond Police Department, confirmed that the search had moved to Redmond and that Redmond officers were assisting in the case but said the investigation was still being overseen by the Bellevue Police Department.
“We are assisting them, but it’s still their case,” Bove said.
No.
It is rare, unless the parents earn pretty much an identical amount. I note that trial was set and then changed on November 2, 2011, or at least the clerk was given authorization to strike the trial date. The massive volume of activity in their divorce case hasn't even culminated in a final trial yet.
I'm still wondering about the 7 months thing. This mom is active in the litigation. How could he have kept the kids (or the daughter) for 7 months without her being able to see her? Wouldn't mom have rushed into court? Unless he hid her?
This is an interesting case. Litigation is heating up again in it. I wonder, if mom claims dad did something, how she could make such a claim. Why would she leave a baby in the car, especially given past citations and if she felt her husband is an abusive person (who could be tracking her, perhaps). Nothing makes sense here.
Can anyone map where this is?
Thank you. Still catching up reading.....
I'm on the fence again. What if dad was 'stalking' or following mom. She really did leave the child in the car and dad took him to scare her?
If the abuse described in a previous post, (kicking, scratching with keys) surely there would have been some documentation of the abuse. It's sad, even I have seen so many parents make false accusations against the other, even I as a SP, question the legitimacy of these accusations.
You're right it makes no sense, unless Dad did follow her and take/hide Sky as a means of getting sole custody of both himself?
ay yi yi.....
can I be just a teeny off topic? conrad murray: guilty
Interesting that everyone keeps saying she clearly favored the girl over the boy, yet I'm on page 6 of her flickr pics and there are just as many of the boy as the girl. Not to mention the boy is properly buckled into his seat, while the daughter is not.
"respondent" is almost always going to be Ex Parte/Family court in Washington. If it's family law, most likely she's named as respondent because the husband is the "petitioner", as in the one filing.
That speaks volumes to me. It is readily apparent that both families have family members who would take care of this child while everything is being sorted out.
Interesting that everyone keeps saying she clearly favored the girl over the boy, yet I'm on page 6 of her flickr pics and there are just as many of the boy as the girl. Not to mention the boy is properly buckled into his seat, while the daughter is not.
Wow, I just did a Google street view and "travelled" from the car to the gas station. They went by a lot of places that she could have gone for help, including a Montessori school, church..... wow.
Sorry but if something was wrong with my car or I ran out of gas with 2 kiddos I would look for the very first safe place to call someone at. I wouldn't be walking right by them.
I just added the other roads (in general) to the case map I started
http://g.co/maps/3bvzz
you can zoom in and out and click on blue push pins to the left
She probably went for the nearest one with a camera to establish her whereabouts.