There is no evidence that she was strangled manually. The cord used is too thin to have covered evidence of manual strangulation. There is no evidence that she was smothered with a hand (or anything else) over her mouth. In fact, on this Meyer specifically mentions in the AR things being absent that would address the question of smothering and therefore disputes the possibility.
otg,
That was not its purpose, which is to offer an alternative explanation for the bruising lying beneath the circumferential ligature furrow. You buy it don't you.The cord used is too thin to have covered evidence of manual strangulation.
Sure, how about manual strangulation, i.e. check the bruising lying beneath the circumferential ligature furrow?There is no evidence that she was smothered with a hand (or anything else) over her mouth. In fact, on this Meyer specifically mentions in the AR things being absent that would address the question of smothering and therefore disputes the possibility.
Of course there is: the bruising lying beneath the circumferential ligature furrow.There is no evidence that she was strangled manually.
It might not suit your preferred theory, but then the head bash does not suit other peoples theory, similarly the time gap between the head bash and asphyxiation.
The sexual assault, well some say it never took place, that the digit was really the rounded aspect of the paintbrush, and the chronic injuries, well they are old, not acute, i.e. not pertinent to JonBenet's homicide.
How would the person staging JonBenet's crime-scene, say PR or JR, know JonBenet had prior chronic internal injuries that required obsfucation?
.