I woke up in the middle of the night (as per usual) and laid there thinking about this task. I am leaning very strongly toward this NOT being an impression made in dirt, and that it's a blood print transferred from the bottom of the shoe to fabric when someone stepped on it. That makes more sense to me since as a few of us have mentioned... it looks like fabric behind it. I just can't wrap my head around a shoe sole looking like fabric weave with the placement of a logo on top of it. That just does not compute. LOL MOO
@Insightful1 - Several of us have unanswered questions that would help us all out a lot.
1) What year was the crime? Even if unknown just us knowing when the print was found would tell it it was that year or before. Even a ballpark would work.
2) Where did the crime take place? For me, all I need is the country since individual states don't make their own brands of shoes. But I'll take the state if you have it!
Knowing if it was made in the US vs. China, Mexico, etc... would be very helpful to us.
3) Do you know how the impression was made? Like was it a print found in dirt or mud, or is it a bloody transfer onto fabric as I outlined above?
4) I'd like to know if LE thinks they are M or F shoes. Did LE state they are tied to the perpetrator (I'd think Male. Sorry guys....) or are they from a female victim? I'm not a sole expert but sole designs may vary by gender.
Thank you! We all want to help you get the answers you seek and answers to these questions will help us do that for you!!