Pink Panther
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 10,700
- Reaction score
- 167
They made them really small back then, didn't they?My wife thinks Michelangelo did okay.
lol
moo
They made them really small back then, didn't they?My wife thinks Michelangelo did okay.
THIS is what really worries me though. I fear that the jury will take her stupidity surrounding the crime and say "well she doesn't really sound like a criminal," so maybe there's more to this story. Oh, and since we're not really sure what happened b/c she's just so stupid and made so many stupid mistakes, we'll give her life in prison instead.
If someone lunges at you in an attack, you will remember that as it looked and felt, not in words. That's one reason Arias seemed so false when the prosecutor asked her to show him the linebacker lunge. She wanted to talk about it in vague terms, anything but demonstrate it with her mouth shut. In fact, she never did stop using words and her physical imitation was far from useful (& looked like a vulture). She had not experienced it, she had devised it in that alphabet soup that passes for a mind. She was near panic when Martinez told her to "show us".
JM didn't hint other than his 2-3 approaches. That was JMO, as I stated. JW cared if their "expert" got called out. JW/KN cared mucho thus the last call when ALV, KN, JW came back into court and ALV complied to JM question about TA being afraid. KN/JW will not be a part of ALV "shenanigans".
She's not in prison. She's in a country jail. Night and Day difference!
If someone lunges at you in an attack, you will remember that as it looked and felt, not in words. That's one reason Arias seemed so false when the prosecutor asked her to show him the linebacker lunge. She wanted to talk about it in vague terms, anything but demonstrate it with her mouth shut. In fact, she never did stop using words and her physical imitation was far from useful (& looked like a vulture). She had not experienced it, she had devised it in that alphabet soup that passes for a mind. She was near panic when Martinez told her to "show us".
But she's the one with all the photo-savvy. For she was a semi-professional. Most computer chips leave a footprint on the motherboard. How does she NOT know this? Why not just take out the memory card as a precaution? It's not making sense.
I really feel we're all missing a piece of this puzzle. I don't believe it's as cut and dry as both sides (accident verses intentional) thinks.
I'm going to have to say that this is an extraordinarily bad time to be male in this particular thread.
If someone lunges at you in an attack, you will remember that as it looked and felt, not in words. That's one reason Arias seemed so false when the prosecutor asked her to show him the linebacker lunge. She wanted to talk about it in vague terms, anything but demonstrate it with her mouth shut. In fact, she never did stop using words and her physical imitation was far from useful (& looked like a vulture). She had not experienced it, she had devised it in that alphabet soup that passes for a mind. She was near panic when Martinez told her to "show us".
You just have to know that all of us girls and women who are not chiming in to this might have differing opinions.
Sent from my hippocampus using Tapatalk
Ack! Sorry boys! Too much discussion of junk--but .... to be fair we all had to see those other photos (which were not a good representation of us girlie ...um...stuff... :-/
:blushing:
Being photo-savvy is quite different from being microchip savvy. You're overestimating her knowledge in computers. Even DeMarte, a college educated woman, assumed that submerging the camera in water would be enough to destroy the evidence. Up until three years ago, I would have thought the same thing and I'm one of those nerds who has built computers from the ground up.
It is cut and dry. It is a fact that the last three incriminating photos were found in allocated space. Ergo they were deleted manually *at the house* on June 4th. That shows two things, 1) she did not intend on taking the camera with her, 2) She did not intend on taking the memory card either.
I don't see a puzzle here, just a woman who made serious mistakes in her altering of the crime scene. She's no female Lex Luther. Just an average woman who failed, like many murderers before her.
BBM That screen was from her Grandfather's house, from what I remember.
Being photo-savvy is quite different from being microchip savvy. You're overestimating her knowledge in computers. Even DeMarte, a college educated woman, assumed that submerging the camera in water would be enough to destroy the evidence. Up until three years ago, I would have thought the same thing and I'm one of those nerds who has built computers from the ground up.
It is cut and dry. It is a fact that the last three incriminating photos were found in allocated space. Ergo they were deleted manually *at the house* on June 4th. That shows two things, 1) she did not intend on taking the camera with her, 2) She did not intend on taking the memory card either.
I don't see a puzzle here, just a woman who made serious mistakes in her altering of the crime scene. She's no female Lex Luther. Just an average woman who failed, like many murderers before her.