Wesley Hadsell Arrested 21-22 March 2015

[arkansasmimi]

Well something is going on.... Gov made a response, 22 pages (still reading it) and there were 2 Exhibits that were asked to be sealed and Judge in Federal Case granted them sealed.

Also here is another new filing. Looks like they went back to the Grand Jury TODAY, Wed, Oct 21, 2015:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
) No: 2:15cr116
v. )
)
WESLEY PAUL HADSELL, )
Defendant. )

GOVERNMENT=S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A
BILL OF PARTICULARS
The United States of America, by it attorneys, Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney for
the Eastern District of Virginia, and Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney,
respectfully submits this response to Defendant Wesley Paul Hadsell’s Motion to Dismiss the
Indictment, or Alternatively, for a Bill of Particulars (hereinafter the “Motion&#8221. For the
reasons stated herein, the government respectfully submits that the defendant’s Motion should be
denied.
The defendant argues that the indictment ought to be dismissed because it is
unconstitutionally vague and fails to give adequate notice of the nature of the charge. In the
alternative, the defendant requests a bill of particulars. The government today sought, and the
grand jury returned, a superseding indictment in this matter. The government expects that the
superseding indictment will address the concerns raised by the defendant in his Motion and will,
therefore, render that Motion moot. The superseding indictment narrows the timeframe of the
charges, includes allegations as to the location of the events, and references the type of
ammunition that is the subject of each charge. Because the indictment that was the subjection
of the Motion has been superseded, and because the superseding indictment addresses the issues
raised in the defense Motion, the Motion is moot and should be denied on that ground.1

For the foregoing reasons, the government respectfully submits that the Motion should be
denied.
Respectfully submitted,
Dana J. Boente
United States Attorney

 

[arkansasmimi]

ok, I am confused, I thought the affidavit to search the hotel room said that AB told them about the ammo in the vent? I understand the plain sight stuff.. but we they not still going by AB testimony? But WE HAVE NEW INFO:::

N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
) No: 2:15cr116
v. )
)
WESLEY PAUL HADSELL, )
Defendant. )

GOVERNMENT=S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

snip:
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
The defendant seeks to suppress evidence found in a search of his hotel room on March 20,
2015. The search was conducted after Investigator R. A. Stocks swore out a detailed affidavit
before Norfolk Magistrate David Vitto, which affidavit Magistrate Vitto found established
probable cause. Magistrate Vitto accordingly issued a search warrant for the hotel room, on
which warrant the Norfolk Police Department relied in executing its search. As a result of that
search, the police found ammunition in plain sight in the hotel room. The defendant argues,
however, that all these steps must be undone through suppression of the evidence because, in his
view, Investigator Stocks’ affidavit failed to establish probable cause.

Court some context.
On March 2, 2015, Angelica Hadsell, an 18 year old young woman and Norfolk resident,
went missing. The Norfolk Police Department engaged in a massive effort to find Ms. Hadsell,
which naturally included investigating the circumstances of her disappearance. As the
investigation progressed, the evidence tended to point to Ms. Hadsell having been abducted, as
opposed to a run-away event. In the course of the search for Ms. Hadsell, members of the Norfolk
Police Department had several encounters with the defendant, who is the step-father of Ms.
Hadsell.
Pursuant to this abduction investigation, Norfolk Police Department Investigator R. A.
Stocks executed an affidavit on March 20, 2015 in support of a search warrant for the defendant’s
hotel room. See Exhibit B. Based on Investigator Stocks’ affidavit, Norfolk Magistrate David
Vitto issued a search warrant for the defendant’s hotel room. See Exhibit A. The warrant
authorized the police to search for and seize specified categories of evidence related to the
potential abduction of Ms. Hadsell.
When the Norfolk Police Department executed the search warrant at the defendant’s hotel
room, they found in plain sight – in different locations – a total of approximately 80 rounds of
ammunition. One round of ammunition was located on a small table in the hotel room; a box
containing ammunition was also found on that same table. Another box of ammunition was
found secreted in an air vent in the hotel room. Although ammunition was not specifically listed
as an item to be seized in the search warrant issued by Magistrate Vitto, the Norfolk Police
Department knew that Mr. Hadsell was a convicted felon and was prohibited from possessing
ammunition. See Exhibit B (describing aspects of the defendant’s felony criminal record);
Virginia Code § 18.2-308.2 (Virginia offense for a felon in possession of ammunition). The
ammunition was therefore seized as evidence of a crime in plain sight.
The same day of the search warrant, the defendant went to the Norfolk Police Operations
Center to answer questions of the detectives. Ultimately, the Norfolk Police Department arrested
Mr. Hadsell on various charges that day while he was still at the Police Operations Center.
Subsequent to the execution of the search warrant on March 20, 2015, the Norfolk Police
Department located the remains of Ms. Hadsell. The Norfolk Police Department investigation
into the circumstances of her disappearance and death remains ongoing.

 

[arkansasmimi]

NEW INFORMATION and why surveillance was started on March 11, 2015 **JMHO, why would that have to have came from a Crimeline tip? Why didnt JH tell them when she made the missing person report??

1. The information contained in Investigator Stocks’ affidavit
Investigator Stocks’ affidavit2
established, among other things, that:
> Anjelica Hadsell was missing as of March 2, 2015. Exhibit B at 1-2.

> Activity on her cellular phone and social media pages had ceased abruptly as of March 2,
2015 and going forward. Exhibit B at 2.

> Without detailing all of them, various other facts existed suggesting that Ms. Hadsell was
potentially abducted, i.e., facts apparently inconsistent with a person who had chosen
simply to run away. Exhibit B at 2.

> That on March 3, 2015, the defendant had stated to Norfolk Police Department Detective
Lefleur that he had seen Ms. Hadsell on the morning of March 2, 2015 when he came over
to her residence in Norfolk. But, further along in the interview, the defendant changed
that story and indicated that he did not see Ms. Hadsell that morning. The defendant also
stated that he was staying at a hotel because his wife was upset that he had started using
cocaine again. Exhibit B at 2-3.

>On March 4, 2015, Detective Lefleur spoke with the defendant again. At this point the
defendant changed his story again and indicated that he last saw Ms. Hadsell at
approximately 12:30 p.m. at a gas station located on Tidewater Drive past Lindenwood Ave. Exhibit B at 3

 

[arkansasmimi]

>On March 10, 2015, attempting to verify the defendant’s statement to Detective Lefluer on
March 4th, Corporal Young discovered that the only gas station in the immediate area as
described by the defendant was a 1 Stop Food Mart at an address specified in the affidavit.
Law enforcement obtained and reviewed surveillance footage from that 1 Stop Food Mart.
The footage did not show the meeting the defendant described, nor did it show any vehicles
known to be operated by the defendant or Ms. Hadsell. Exhibit B at

>On March 7, 2015, detectives received a Crimeline tip stating that the defendant had
previously abducted his ex-wife. After receiving this request, Detective Lefluer verified it
by contacting authorities in the state in which the abduction occurred. The authorities
confirmed the defendant had been involved in a similar incident to the one described in the
Crimeline tip. On March 10, 2015, Detective Lefluer further verified this information by
contacting the victim of that alleged abduction.3
The victim stated, among other things
described in the affidavit, that on one occasion the defendant had stolen property, then
dragged her to the bedroom and strangled and raped her. Two days after that incident, the
victim stated the defendant had broken into her residence, abducted her, assaulted her, and
totally disassembled her cell phone. The defendant had stated that she could still be
tracked by police if the battery was not out of the cell phone device. The defendant had
forced her into his vehicle and held her against her will until he was arrested approximately
two weeks later. Exhibit B at 3.

 

[arkansasmimi]

>On March 11, 2015, physical and mobile surveillance was established on the defendant’s
known hotel room located at 1850 East Little Creed Road, MD International Hotel.4
Exhibit B at 3. The affidavit later states that a registry check of America’s Best Value Inn
room 129, located at 1850 E. Little Creek Road in Norfolk, Virginia showed the defendant
renting the room. Exhibit B at 4.

>On March 12, 2015, Norfolk police department surveillance units reported that the
defendant was engaging in conduct that appeared consistent with someone who was
surveillance conscious and who was attempting to detect surveillance. The affidavit
included specific descriptions of activities the defendant was observed to take in this
regard. Exhibit B at 3.

> Detective Mezo reviewed the defendant’s criminal history and identified that the defendant
had been convicted in North Carolina of two counts of Felony Restraint and two counts of
Breaking and Entering on the same incident date. The affidavit notes that Felony
Restraint is North Carolina’s equivalent of the Virginia Abduction Code. Exhibit B at
3-4.

> On March, 19, 2015, the defendant contacted the Norfolk Police Department and stated
that he received an anonymous call from an unknown number stating that they saw
clothing possibly belonging to Ms. Hadsell. The defendant advised that he went and
retrieved the clothing. The Norfolk Police Department responded to the City of
Chesapeake and recovered the property, which was later positively identified as belonging
to Ms. Hadsell. Exhibit B at 4.

 

[arkansasmimi]

On March 20, 2015, the defendant came to the Police Operation Center where he was
questioned about some inconsistency in his statement. The defendant could not explain
why video surveillance did not show him at the gas station where and when he stated that
he last met with Ms. Hadsell. The defendant also changed his story about his whereabouts
during the approximate time of Ms. Hadsell’s disappearance. Further, the affidavit
recounts that when the defendant was questioned about possible phone location data, he
stated that the data appeared to show that Ms. Hadsell’s phone was with him during her
time of disappearance, but could not provide an explanation for the possible finds of that
data. The defendant also stated that he deleted the call record from his call log showing
the call from an unknown number about the information regarding the location of Ms.
Hadsell’s recovered property. Exhibit B at 4.

 

[arkansasmimi]

The affidavit notes that it has been the affiant’s experience that individuals who commit a
crime will often hide fruits of a crime in a safe place where the only have access to.
Exhibit B at 4. In this regard, the affidavit also details that the affiant has in excess of 12
years of experience with the Norfolk Police Department. Exhibit B at 4.
Magistrate Vitto found that the affidavit established probable cause for the Virginia
offense of abduction, which provides, in relevant part:
Any person who, by force, intimidation or deception, and without legal justification
or excuse, seizes, takes, transports, detains or secretes another person with the
intent to deprive such other person of his personal liberty or to withhold or conceal
him from any person, authority or institution lawfully entitled to his charge, shall be
deemed guilty of “abduction.”
Virginia State Code § 18.2-47(a). See Exhibit A at 1.

 

[Happyshoes]

I'm familiar with predatory behavior, too...long story on my part so won't go into it, but that is so often is the case. I can't help but think that once everything else is eliminated, they will find it true here, too. The word obsessive has been used so often, along with monster - those words just point to one person for me. IMO, etc. I think anybody else would have been arrested already. JMO here, too.

 

[JadeSLeuth]

Man, they were on to him from the beginning. So much new and confirmed information here. Thanks so much arkansasmimi!

 

[arkansasmimi]

This is the Gov arguing that there was probable cause to get a search warrant for the Hotel room per NPD LEO.

Snip>
Third, the affidavit contained facts supporting the conclusion that the defendant had sought
to thwart the investigation into Ms. Hadsell disappearance. The affidavit contained information
that the defendant had engaged in counter-surveillance maneuvers. Counter-surveillance
maneuvers, by themselves, may not say much. But, when coupled with the other facts in the
affidavit regarding the defendant’s false and inconsistent statements to law enforcement, it tends to
support the conclusion that the defendant was actively seeking to thwart the law enforcement
investigation into Ms. Hadsell’s disappearance. The affidavit also noted that the defendant had
deleted call logs from his cellular phone, including a call he claimed he received from an
individual who he claimed had told him the location of some of Ms. Hadsell’s clothing.
Magistrate Vitto could reasonably have concluded that these facts were consistent with the actions
of a person seeking to thwart the investigation into the disappearance of his step-daughter and that
a person seeking to thwart the investigation into the disappearance of a family member would only
likely be doing so if that person had some involvement in the disappearance.
Fourth, the affidavit contained facts that the defendant had engaged in prior acts of
abduction. The affidavit recounted prior Felony Restraint convictions in North Carolina. And
he affidavit recounted information that the defendant, in a different state from North Carolina, had
previously raped, abducted and kidnapped his ex-wife. The affidavit therefore recounted at least
two separate prior incidents in which there was information that the defendant had abducted or
unlawfully restrained persons. Magistrate Vitto could reasonably have concluded that these prior
crimes – or alleged criminal conduct (in the case of the defendant’s ex-wife) – made it relatively
more likely that the defendant had engaged in abduction in this case, especially when coupled with
the other information detailed above. Cf. Fed. R. Evid. 404(b).
Finally, the affidavit contained information connecting the defendant with the place to be
searched and identifying that evidence of a crime was likely to be present.6
The affidavit recounts
that the defendant admitted that he was living in a hotel room due to problems he had been having
with his wife from his drug use. The affidavit notes that Norfolk police surveillance was
conducted at the defendant’s known hotel room at 1850 E. Little Creek Road, and that the hotel’s
registry showed the defendant renting room 129. The surveillance was within 10 days of the date
the search warrant was executed. Although the information regarding the registry did not list the
date of the registry check, the affidavit otherwise makes clear that these pertinent facts were all
related to recent events in time, as the abduction investigation arose out of Ms. Hadsell’s
disappearance on March 2, 2015. The affiant, who had substantial experience in law
enforcement, indicated that in his experience individuals who commit crimes tend to hide the fruits
of that crime in a safe place where only they have access to. That statement was buttressed by the
facts in the affidavit that the defendant had moved out of the family home to a hotel room that he
was renting at the time of the investigation and search warrant. In other words, the facts in the
affidavit supported the conclusion that evidence was likely to be at the defendant’s hotel room as
opposed to the family home. Also, Magistrate Vitto could reasonably have concluded based on
the facts in the affidavit that it would be unlikely for the defendant to hide evidence of the
abduction at the home he had previously shared with his wife, who is the mother of Ms. Hadsell.
The defendant would not have had sole control over that location (as opposed to the hotel room),
and, while all things are possible, secreting evidence of the abduction of a daughter at the residence
of the mother would be hazardous if one’s goal was to conceal that evidence, as is usually the case.

 

[Happyshoes]

Arkansasmimi, thanks and good job. Very interesting that it was worded "individuals who commit a crime will often hide the fruits of the crime in a safe place that they have access to". I think that's why when his sister found out the location, she freaked and started to question his answers. I'll never forget that she said all Wes wanted from her was money in his commissary account and to focus on the money raising aspect. If I have that wrong, somebody correct me - no worries. I'm still wondering about Pa$tor Moran and his role in this - did he just come in seeing an opportunity to raise money? May be irrelevant. Sad all around.

 

[arkansasmimi]

His changing time line and priors is what appears to be what got him on the radar. There is still (JMHO) room for set up, so many things in this whole case are off to me. A lot of WH actions, are as the doc says, the way a person with a prior history would act. If someone privy to WH priors, they could use that, along with his prior mental issue (or for some reason it seems like he has some in prev legal papers) could account for some of his change of stories.... and doing drugs, nerves...Not making excuses for him, just thinking out loud. Because with all this info that the NPD has had since back before WH was arrested and prior to AJ remains found...and WH HAS BEEN IN JAIL, yet he has never been charged or even called a POI by the NPD. And as our Legal Expert Member stated, maybe there is a witness name in the sealed info... I just dont get the feeling it that easy of a case for them. ONGOING, so wonder if they watching others ...JMHO :thinking:

I would think the LEO would in this day and time run background checks on people at beginning. Which non LEO sleuths did right off the bat. I still want to see more, all this just makes me have a lot more questions. But like seeing the documents, I no longer trust the media giving their spin. There are more people that know what happened than have spoken out. Praying for the NPD to get all the right evidence, so that if it is determined foul play, all those responsible in one degree or another have consequences to answer to.

:findinglink: I uploaded the last links here on the Doc page http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...ocs-**NO-DISCUSSION**&p=12133659#post12133659

ETA: Also, why did they drop the charges they had an indictment for? I do not personally believe that it was just so that with the feds could get more time. Double Jeopardy is referenced few times in the document from WH Lawyer... JMHO and hopefully our Attorney will have time to maybe look over the docs and give opinion?? lease: I understand the plain sight but on the Affidavit it states that they were going to look in the vents per AB testimony (he had to have told them that on March 20, to have said it during the Hearing where he was subpoena to testify) JMHO

Also wondering if they are looking at other drug happenings in the area, if there could be another connection we dont know of? JMO

 

[NWLady]

Thank you arkansasmimi for all the information. It is appreciated!

 

[AZlawyer]

His changing time line and priors is what appears to be what got him on the radar. There is still (JMHO) room for set up, so many things in this whole case are off to me. A lot of WH actions, are as the doc says, the way a person with a prior history would act. If someone privy to WH priors, they could use that, along with his prior mental issue (or for some reason it seems like he has some in prev legal papers) could account for some of his change of stories.... and doing drugs, nerves...Not making excuses for him, just thinking out loud. Because with all this info that the NPD has had since back before WH was arrested and prior to AJ remains found...and WH HAS BEEN IN JAIL, yet he has never been charged or even called a POI by the NPD. And as our Legal Expert Member stated, maybe there is a witness name in the sealed info... I just dont get the feeling it that easy of a case for them. ONGOING, so wonder if they watching others ...JMHO :thinking:

I would think the LEO would in this day and time run background checks on people at beginning. Which non LEO sleuths did right off the bat. I still want to see more, all this just makes me have a lot more questions. But like seeing the documents, I no longer trust the media giving their spin. There are more people that know what happened than have spoken out. Praying for the NPD to get all the right evidence, so that if it is determined foul play, all those responsible in one degree or another have consequences to answer to.

:findinglink: I uploaded the last links here on the Doc page http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...ocs-**NO-DISCUSSION**&p=12133659#post12133659

ETA: Also, why did they drop the charges they had an indictment for? I do not personally believe that it was just so that with the feds could get more time. Double Jeopardy is referenced few times in the document from WH Lawyer... JMHO and hopefully our Attorney will have time to maybe look over the docs and give opinion?? lease: I understand the plain sight but on the Affidavit it states that they were going to look in the vents per AB testimony (he had to have told them that on March 20, to have said it during the Hearing where he was subpoena to testify) JMHO

Also wondering if they are looking at other drug happenings in the area, if there could be another connection we dont know of? JMO

They might have been looking in the vents for evidence relating to the abduction (like the daughter's phone), and then in "plain sight" when they looked there, they saw the ammo.

 

[katydid23]

His changing time line and priors is what appears to be what got him on the radar. There is still (JMHO) room for set up, so many things in this whole case are off to me. A lot of WH actions, are as the doc says, the way a person with a prior history would act. If someone privy to WH priors, they could use that, along with his prior mental issue (or for some reason it seems like he has some in prev legal papers) could account for some of his change of stories.... and doing drugs, nerves...Not making excuses for him, just thinking out loud. Because with all this info that the NPD has had since back before WH was arrested and prior to AJ remains found...and WH HAS BEEN IN JAIL, yet he has never been charged or even called a POI by the NPD. And as our Legal Expert Member stated, maybe there is a witness name in the sealed info... I just dont get the feeling it that easy of a case for them. ONGOING, so wonder if they watching others ...JMHO :thinking:

I would think the LEO would in this day and time run background checks on people at beginning. Which non LEO sleuths did right off the bat. I still want to see more, all this just makes me have a lot more questions. But like seeing the documents, I no longer trust the media giving their spin. There are more people that know what happened than have spoken out. Praying for the NPD to get all the right evidence, so that if it is determined foul play, all those responsible in one degree or another have consequences to answer to.

:findinglink: I uploaded the last links here on the Doc page http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...ocs-**NO-DISCUSSION**&p=12133659#post12133659

ETA: Also, why did they drop the charges they had an indictment for? I do not personally believe that it was just so that with the feds could get more time. Double Jeopardy is referenced few times in the document from WH Lawyer... JMHO and hopefully our Attorney will have time to maybe look over the docs and give opinion?? lease: I understand the plain sight but on the Affidavit it states that they were going to look in the vents per AB testimony (he had to have told them that on March 20, to have said it during the Hearing where he was subpoena to testify) JMHO

Also wondering if they are looking at other drug happenings in the area, if there could be another connection we dont know of? JMO

I don't think he was 'set up' or framed. I think he is a violent, impulsive, selfish jerk. When I read this part:



Fourth, the affidavit contained facts that the defendant had engaged in prior acts of
abduction. The affidavit recounted prior Felony Restraint convictions in North Carolina. And
the affidavit recounted information that the defendant, in a different state from North Carolina, had
previously raped, abducted and kidnapped his ex-wife. The affidavit therefore recounted at least
two separate prior incidents in which there was information that the defendant had abducted or
unlawfully restrained persons. Magistrate Vitto could reasonably have concluded that these prior
crimes – or alleged criminal conduct (in the case of the defendant’s ex-wife) – made it relatively
more likely that the defendant had engaged in abduction in this case, especially when coupled with
the other information detailed above. Cf. Fed. R. Evid. 404(b).

How many people do you know that have been arrested twice for abduction and/or rape?

I don't think anyone set him up. He is just a freak, imo. And he wanted what he wanted and he made it happen.

 

[arkansasmimi]

They might have been looking in the vents for evidence relating to the abduction (like the daughter's phone), and then in "plain sight" when they looked there, they saw the ammo.

Agree, but from the affidavit (non lawyer here lol) when they spoke with witnesses on March 20 which one was AB, as he spoke at the Hearing) from the affidavit in the Fed Ammo charge, ref info from the obstruction charges .. that they used in the B&E so they knew he had at least prior put something in the vents per AB

6. On May 11,2015, A.B. testified in the General District Court of the City of Norfolk in
the matter of Commonwealth of Virginia v. Wesley Hadsetl, that, among other things, one
night he and another individual "went over to Wes's [HADSELL's] hotel room. He
[HADSELL] asked us to drop him off because he didn't have a car at the time. So we
dropped him off and he invited us over. Before we went and left, he said he had to grab a
bag. He said it was his bag of toys. He didn't want the cops to find out. We went back
to the room. He pulled outammo. He said he had two guns, but he kept those in the bag,
put the ammo in the air vent."

 

[arkansasmimi]

Just thinking out loud...
JH was from the area. WH was from the area. From what we know they both grew up there. It is possible that they may have known one another long ago and that meeting in the bar after he got out of prison was not a first meeting but a "hey haven't seen ya in years kind of meeting". Would make some other things make a little more sense too. JMHO

 

[arkansasmimi]

I don't think he was 'set up' or framed. I think he is a violent, impulsive, selfish jerk. When I read this part:


How many people do you know that have been arrested twice for abduction and/or rape?

I don't think anyone set him up. He is just a freak, imo. And he wanted what he wanted and he made it happen.

RSBBM, I agree with the bold. Again, I am saying, thinking out loud, it would be very easy for someone knowing all of this to do that.. knowing WH tendencies and past. It is very possible. Probable, don't know.

For the record I dont know one, let alone 2 people arrested for abduction and/or rape. In the world, I am sure many. Thats what the LEO are going by (sadly they deal with it more than anyone should have to. It would be reckless for then not to look at it.) So far, I personally haven't seen anyone say that WH was inappropriate or had a bad relationship with AJ or even allege it. But again, I like everyone else wonder why they haven't arrested him or at least officially called him a POI? Its evident he was in the beginning because of his prior but he has been in jail since March 20. He is alot of things for sure, so far I still reading and waiting like everyone else.

 

[katydid23]

>On March 7, 2015, detectives received a Crimeline tip stating that the defendant had
previously abducted his ex-wife. After receiving this request, Detective Lefluer verified it
by contacting authorities in the state in which the abduction occurred. The authorities
confirmed the defendant had been involved in a similar incident to the one described in the
Crimeline tip. On March 10, 2015, Detective Lefluer further verified this information by
contacting the victim of that alleged abduction.3
The victim stated, among other things
described in the affidavit, that on one occasion the defendant had stolen property, then
dragged her to the bedroom and strangled and raped her. Two days after that incident, the
victim stated the defendant had broken into her residence, abducted her, assaulted her, and
totally disassembled her cell phone. The defendant had stated that she could still be
tracked by police if the battery was not out of the cell phone device. The defendant had
forced her into his vehicle and held her against her will until he was arrested approximately
two weeks later. Exhibit B at 3.
=======================================================

Oh my. That story makes the hair on the back of my neck stand straight up. He is so much meaner and more evil than he pretends to be, imo.

His ex was younger than him and looked very similar to AJ, imo.

 

[katydid23]

RSBBM, I agree with the bold. Again, I am saying, thinking out loud, it would be very easy for someone knowing all of this to do that.. knowing WH tendencies and past. It is very possible. Probable, don't know.

For the record I dont know one, let alone 2 people arrested for abduction and/or rape. In the world, I am sure many. Thats what the LEO are going by (sadly they deal with it more than anyone should have to. It would be reckless for then not to look at it.) So far, I personally haven't seen anyone say that WH was inappropriate or had a bad relationship with AJ or even allege it. But again, I like everyone else wonder why they haven't arrested him or at least officially called him a POI? Its evident he was in the beginning because of his prior but he has been in jail since March 20. He is alot of things for sure, so far I still reading and waiting like everyone else.

I don't see how it would be possible for anyone to have set him up. All of the 'staged' and set up things were done by Wesley himself. He was the one who told the cops various versions of where he was the day AJ went missing. No one orchestrated that inconsistent story, but himself.

No one set him up to say he was at a gas station with AJ, when he really wasn't. That was all Wes.

No one 'set him up' to find all those belongings of hers in the field, and to say he got a tip called in on his phone, which was erased or never there/ That was all on him.

I don't see any way that anyone set him up. He was the one who had the pix of he and AJ shooting guns. No one put those pix on his phone , imo.

They have phone data that seems to show that AJ's cell was at the same place as Wes was when she went missing. THAT is huge, imo.

And I don't believe that anyone could have gone to his room and placed the ammo there either. Because now we know there was surveillance. And especially that morning, when he was called into the station. They knew they were going to search his room. They would have seen someone if they tried to go in there and plant ammo after Wes left.

No one framed Wes, imo. He should have been locked up already for the violence against his ex. JMO